Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 23, Issue 12, pp 2759–2762 | Cite as

Cervical laminoplasty

  • Hossein MehdainEmail author
  • Oliver M. Stokes
Open Operating Theatre (OOT)

Keywords

Cervical myelopathy Motion preservation Laminoplasty plate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (WMV 197314 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Nurick S (1972) The natural history and the results of surgical treatment of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain 95(1):101–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Swank ML, Lowery GL, Bhat AL, McDonough RF (1997) Anterior cervical allograft arthrodesis and instrumentation: multilevel interbody grafting or strut graft reconstruction. Eur Spine J 6(2):138–143PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sagi HC, Beutler W, Carroll E, Connolly PJ (2002) Airway complications associated with surgery on the anterior cervical spine. Spine Phila Pa (1976) 27(9):949–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hukuda S, Mochizuki T, Ogata M (1985) Operations for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. A comparison of the results of anterior and posterior procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67(4):609–615PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ryken TC, Heary RF, Matz PG, Anderson PA, Groff MW, Holly LT, Kaiser MG, Mummaneni PV, Choudhri TF, Vresilovic EJ, Resnick DK (2009) Cervical laminectomy for the treatment of cervical degenerative myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 11(2): 142–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yamazaki A, Homma T, Uchiyama S, Katsumi Y, Okumura H (1999) Morphologic limitations of posterior decompression by midsagittal splitting method for myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. Spine Phila Pa (1976) 24(1):32–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oyama M, Hattori S, Moriwaki N (1973) A new method of posterior decompression [in Japanese]. Chubuseisaisi 16:792Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Suzuki N, Satomi K, Ishii Y (1983) Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine Phila Pa (1976) 8(7):693–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kurokawa T, Tsuyama N, Tanaka H (1982) Enlargement of spinal canal by the sagittal splitting of the spinous process. Bessatusu Seikeigeka 2:234–240Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chiba K, Ogawa Y, Ishii K, Takaishi H, Nakamura M, Maruiwa H, Matsumoto M, Toyama Y (2006) Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy—average 14-year follow-up study. Spine Phila Pa (1976) 31(26):2998–3005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seichi A, Takeshita K, Ohishi I, Kawaguchi H, Akune T, Anamizu Y, Kitagawa T, Nakamura K (2001) Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine Phila Pa (1976) 26(5):479–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Queens’s Medical CentreNottingham University HospitalsNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations