European Spine Journal

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 127–135 | Cite as

The severity of operative invasion to the posterior muscular-ligament complex influences cervical sagittal balance after open-door laminoplasty

  • Shengrong Lin
  • Feifei Zhou
  • Yu Sun
  • Zhongqiang Chen
  • Fengshan Zhang
  • Shengfa Pan
Original Article



The aim of this study was to investigate how the severity of operative invasion to the posterior muscular-ligament complex impacts postoperative cervical sagittal balance.

Materials and methods

Ninety cases of open-door expansive laminoplasty due to cervical spondylotic myelopathy were reviewed. Fifty-three patients underwent laminoplasty with unilateral preservation of the muscular-ligament complex (unilateral elevation group). Thirty-seven patients underwent traditional open-door laminoplasty (bilateral elevation group). Preoperative and postoperative cervical sagittal parameters, including C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), C0–2 Cobb angle and T1 slope, were compared. The cervical curvature, range of motion (ROM) and JOA score were also compared.


The average follow-up time was 16.7 months (range 3–40 months). C2–C7 SVA significantly increased in the bilateral elevation group (+4.9 mm, P = 0.005) but remained unchanged in the unilateral elevation group (−0.2 mm, P = 0.414). The C0–2 Cobb angle increased in both groups (+4.1°, P < 0.001; +2.5°, P = 0.002). The T1 slope also increased in both groups (+1.1°, P = 0.015; +0.7°, P = 0.042). The postoperative C3–C7 curvature significantly decreased in the bilateral elevation group (−4.1°, P < 0.001). The C3–C7 ROM decreased in both groups (−17.9°, P < 0.001; −15.1°, P < 0.001). C2–C7 SVA was positively correlated with the T1 slope (Pearson = 0.468, P < 0.001) and negatively correlated with the C3–C7 curvature (Pearson = −0.322, P = 0.001). The C0–2 Cobb angle was positively correlated with C2–C7 SVA (Pearson = 0.303, P = 0.004) and negatively correlated with the C3–C7 curvature (Pearson = −0.362, P < 0.001). There was no significant between-group difference in the JOA improvement rate.


Open-door laminoplasty significantly affected postoperative cervical sagittal balance, with the cervical vertebra appearing to tilt forward. As the severity of surgical invasion to the posterior muscular-ligament complex increased, the loss of cervical sagittal balance also increased.


Open-door laminoplasty Cervical sagittal balance Muscular-ligament complex 


Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    Chiba K, Ogawa Y, Ishii K et al (2006) Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy—average 14-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2998–3005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishihara H et al (2003) Minimum 10-year follow up after en bloc cervical laminoplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 411:129–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tang JA, Scheer JK, Smith JS et al (2012) The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery. Neurosurgery 71:662–669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DE Harrison, Harrison DD, Cailliet R et al (2000) Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2072–2078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bartels RH, Verbeek AL, Benzel EC et al (2010) Validation of a translated version of the modified Japanese orthopaedic association score to assess outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an approach to globalize outcomes assessment tools. Neurosurgery 66:1013–1016PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chavanne A, Pettigrew DB, Holtz JR et al (2011) Spinal cord intramedullary pressure in cervical kyphotic deformity: a cadaveric study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:1619–1626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smith JS, Lafage V, Ryan DJ et al (2013) Association of myelopathy scores with cervical sagittal balance and normalized spinal cord volume: analysis of 56 preoperative cases from the AOSpine North America Myelopathy Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:S161–S170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knott PT, Mardjetko SM, Techy F (2010) The use of the T1 sagittal angle in predicting overall sagittal balance of the spine. Spine J 10:994–998PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim TH, Lee SY, Kim YC et al (2013) T1 slope as a predictor of kyphotic alignment change after laminoplasty in cervical myelopathy patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E992–E997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ames CP, Blondel B, Scheer JK et al (2013) Cervical radiographic alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:S149–S160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang S, Passias PG, Cui L et al (2013) Does atlantoaxial dislocation influence the subaxial cervical spine? Eur Spine J 22:1603–1607PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nolan JP Jr, Sherk HH (1988) Biomechanical evaluation of the extensor muscular of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13:9–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vasavada AN, Li S, Delp SL (1998) Influence of muscle morphometry and moment arms on the moment-generating capacity of human neck muscles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:412–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Luk KD, Kamath V, Avadhani A et al (2010) Cervical laminoplasty. Eur Spine J 19:347–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kotani Y, Abumi K, Ito M et al (2009) Minimum 2-year outcome of cervical laminoplasty with deep extensor muscle-preserving approach: impact on cervical spine function and quality of life. Eur Spine J 18:663–671PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Takeuchi K, Yokoyama T, Ono A et al (2007) Cervical range of motion and alignment after laminoplasty preserving or reattaching the semispinalis cervicis inserted into axis. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:571–576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y et al (2011) Medium-term outcomes of C3–6 laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: a prospective study with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 20:928–933PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ratliff JK, Cooper PR (2003) Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review. J Neurosurg Spine 98:230–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sun Y, Zhang F, Wang S et al (2010) Open door expansive laminoplasty and postoperative axial symptoms: a comparative study between two different procedures. Evid Based Spine Care J 1:27–34PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu J, Bergheim NA, Sanford CG Jr et al (2007) Preservation of the spinous process ligament muscle complex to prevent kyphotic deformity following laminoplasty. Spine J 7:159–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Ishihara H et al (1999) Axial symptoms after en bloc cervical laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord 12:392–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y et al (2010) Preservation of muscles attached to the C2 and C7 spinous processes rather than subaxial deep extensors reduces adverse effects after cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:E782–E786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yoshida M, Tamaki T, Kawakami M et al (2002) Does reconstruction of posterior ligamentous complex with extensor musculature decrease axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:1414–1418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hosono N, Sakaura H, Mukai Y et al (2006) C3–6 laminoplasty takes over C3–7 laminoplasty with significantly lower incidence of axial neck pain. Eur Spine J 15:1375–1379PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tsuji T, Asazuma T, Masuoka K et al (2007) Retrospective cohort study between selective and standard C3-7 laminoplasty. Minimum 2-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J 16:2072–2077PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tani S, Isoshima A, Nagashima Y et al (2002) Laminoplasty with preservation of posterior cervical elements: surgical technique. Neurosurgery 50:97–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Qiu S, Sun Y, Zhang F et al (2010) Effect of open-door laminoplasty together with preservation of the unilateral paraspinal muscle ligament complex on the posterior muscle volume of cervical spine. Chin J Spine Spinal Cord 20:401–405 (article in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shengrong Lin
    • 1
  • Feifei Zhou
    • 1
  • Yu Sun
    • 1
  • Zhongqiang Chen
    • 1
  • Fengshan Zhang
    • 1
  • Shengfa Pan
    • 1
  1. 1.Orthopaedic DepartmentPeking University Third HospitalBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations