Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 24, Supplement 4, pp 494–501 | Cite as

Rare complications of osteolysis and periprosthetic tissue reactions after hybrid and non-hybrid total disc replacement

  • Sai Y. Veruva
  • Todd H. Lanman
  • Josa A. Hanzlik
  • Steven M. Kurtz
  • Marla J. SteinbeckEmail author
Case Report

Abstract

Purpose

Few complications have been reported for lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) and hybrid TDR fixations. This study evaluated retrieved implants and periprosthetic tissue reactions for two cases of osteolysis following disc arthroplasty with ProDisc-L prostheses.

Methods

Implants were examined for wear and surface damage, and tissues for inflammation, polyethylene wear debris (polarized light microscopy) and metal debris (energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy).

Results

Despite initial good surgical outcomes, osteolytic cysts were noted in both patients at vertebrae adjacent to the implants. For the hybrid TDR case, heterotopic ossification and tissue necrosis due to wear-induced inflammation were observed. In contrast, the non-hybrid implant showed signs of abrasion and impingement, and inflammation was observed in tissue regions with metal and polyethylene wear debris.

Conclusions

In both cases, wear debris and inflammation may have contributed to osteolysis. Surgeons using ProDisc prostheses should be aware of these rare complications.

Keywords

Chronic inflammation Hybrid fixation Metal wear debris Osteolysis Polyethylene wear debris Total disc replacement 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Eual Phillips for his help in performing the image analysis for this study.

Conflict of interest

This study was supported by a grant from the NIAMS (NIH R01 AR56264). Institutional support was received from Medtronic and DePuy Synthes for research unrelated to this work (SMK). For THL, he is a consultant and receives royalties from Medtronic.

Supplementary material

586_2014_3535_MOESM1_ESM.docx (2.9 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 2938 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Aunoble S, Meyrat R, Al Sawad Y, Tournier C, Leijssen P, Le Huec JC (2010) Hybrid construct for two levels disc disease in lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 19:290–296. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1182-7 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Ooij A, Kurtz SM, Stessels F, Noten H, van Rhijn L (2007) Polyethylene wear debris and long-term clinical failure of the charite disc prosthesis: a study of 4 patients. Spine(Phila Pa 1976) 32:223–229. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000251370.56327.c6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kurtz SM, van Ooij A, Ross R, de Malefijt Waal J, Peloza J, Ciccarelli L, Villarraga ML (2007) Polyethylene wear and rim fracture in total disc arthroplasty. Spine J 7:12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.05.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Campbell P, Ma S, Yeom B, McKellop H, Schmalzried TP, Amstutz HC (1995) Isolation of predominantly submicron-sized UHMWPE wear particles from periprosthetic tissues. J Biomed Mater Res 29:127–131. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820290118 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McKay B, Sandhu HS (2002) Use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in spinal fusion applications. Spine 27:S66–S85. doi: 10.1097/01.Brs.0000020738.16636.B3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Choudhry OJ, Christiano LD, Singh R, Golden BM, Liu JK (2012) Bone morphogenetic protein-induced inflammatory cyst formation after lumbar fusion causing nerve root compression case report. J Neurosurg Spine 16:296–301. doi: 10.3171/2011.11.Spine11629 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kurtz SM, Villarraga ML, Ianuzzi A (2009) The clinical performance of UHMWPE in the spine. In: UHMWPE Biomaterials Handbook. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 180Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anderson CL, Whitaker MC (2012) Heterotopic ossification associated with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (infuse) in posterolateral lumbar spine fusion. Spine 37:E502–E506CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mannion RJ, Nowitzke AM, Wood MJ (2011) Promoting fusion in minimally invasive lumbar interbody stabilization with low-dose bone morphogenic protein-2–but what is the cost? Spine J off J North Am Spine Soc 11:527–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chrastil J, Patel AA (2012) Complications associated with posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20:283–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lewandrowski KU, Nanson C, Calderon R (2007) Vertebral osteolysis after posterior interbody lumbar fusion with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2: a report of five cases. Spine J off J North Am Spine Soc 7:609–614. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McClellan JW, Mulconrey DS, Forbes RJ, Fullmer N (2006) Vertebral bone resorption after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2). J Spinal Disord Tech 19:483–486. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211231.83716.4b CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vaidya R, Sethi A, Bartol S, Jacobson M, Coe C, Craig JG (2008) Complications in the use of rhBMP-2 in PEEK cages for interbody spinal fusions. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:557–562. doi: 10.1097/Bsd.0b013e31815ea897 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glassman SD, Howard JM, Sweet A, Carreon LY (2010) Complications and concerns with osteobiologics for spine fusion in clinical practice. Spine 35:1621–1628. doi: 10.1097/Brs.0b013e3181ce11cc CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Benglis D, Wang MY, Levi AD (2008) A comprehensive review of the safety profile of bone morphogenetic protein in spine surgery. Neurosurgery 62:423–431. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000326030.24220.d8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kurtz SM, MacDonald D, Ianuzzi A, van Ooij A, Isaza J, Ross ER, Regan J (2009) The natural history of polyethylene oxidation in total disc replacement. Spine 34:2369–2377. doi: 10.1097/Brs.0b013e3181b20230 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Choma TJ, Miranda J, Siskey R, Baxter R, Steinbeck MJ, Kurtz SM (2009) Retrieval Analysis of a ProDisc-L Total Disc Replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 22:290–296. doi: 10.1097/Bsd.0b013e31816dd2b6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tumialan LM, Gluf WM (2011) Progressive vertebral body osteolysis after cervical disc arthroplasty. Spine 36:E973–E978. doi: 10.1097/Brs.0b013e3181fd863b CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Purdue PE, Koulouvaris P, Nestor BJ, Sculco TP (2006) The central role of wear debris in periprosthetic osteolysis. HSS J Musculoskelet J Hosp Spec Surg 2:102–113. doi: 10.1007/s11420-006-9003-6 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Campbell P, Ebramzadeh E, Nelson S, Takamura K, De Smet K, Amstutz HC (2010) Histological features of pseudotumor-like tissues from metal-on-metal hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2321–2327. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1372-y CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sai Y. Veruva
    • 1
  • Todd H. Lanman
    • 2
  • Josa A. Hanzlik
    • 1
  • Steven M. Kurtz
    • 1
    • 3
  • Marla J. Steinbeck
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Biomedical Engineering and Health SciencesDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Exponent IncPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryDrexel University College of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations