European Spine Journal

, Volume 23, Issue 12, pp 2726–2736 | Cite as

Proximal junctional kyphosis following adult spinal deformity surgery

Review Article

Abstract

Purpose

Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a common radiographic finding following long spinal fusions. Whether PJK leads to negative clinical outcome is currently debatable. A systematic review was performed to assess the prevalence, risk factors, and treatments of PJK.

Methods

Literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using the terms ‘proximal junctional kyphosis’ and ‘proximal junctional failure’. Excluding reviews, commentaries, and case reports, we analyzed 33 studies that reported the prevalence rate, risk factors, and discussions on PJK following spinal deformity surgery.

Results

The prevalence rates varied widely from 6 to 61.7 %. Numerous studies reported that clinical outcomes for patients with PJK were not significantly different from those without, except in one recent study in which adult patients with PJK experienced more pain. Risk factors for PJK included age at operation, low bone mineral density, shorter fusion constructs, upper instrumented vertebrae below L2, and inadequate restoration of global sagittal balance.

Conclusions

Prevalence of PJK following long spinal fusion for adult spinal deformity was high but not clinically significant. Careful and detailed preoperative planning and surgical execution may reduce PJK in adult spinal deformity patients.

Keywords

Proximal junctional kyphosis Proximal junctional failure Adult scoliosis Adult spinal deformity Scoliosis 

References

  1. 1.
    Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rhim S, Cheh G (2006) Sagittal thoracic decompensation following long adult lumbar spinal instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: causes, prevalence, and risk factor analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2359–2366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hostin R, McCarthy I, O’Brien M, et al. (2012) Incidence, mode, and location of acute proximal junctional failures following surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yagi M, Akilah KB, Boachie-Adjei O (2011) Incidence, risk factors and classification of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E60–E68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hyun SJ, Rhim SC (2010) Clinical outcomes and complications after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients : a long-term follow-up data. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 47:95–101PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Watanabe K, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Kim YJ, Koester L, Hensley M (2010) Proximal junctional vertebral fracture in adults after spinal deformity surgery using pedicle screw constructs: analysis of morphological features. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:138–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    O’Leary PT, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2009) Risk factors and outcomes for catastrophic failures at the top of long pedicle screw constructs: a matched cohort analysis performed at a single center. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2134–2139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hart RA, Prendergast MA, Roberts WG, Nesbit GM, Barnwell SL (2008) Proximal junctional acute collapse cranial to multi-level lumbar fusion: a cost analysis of prophylactic vertebral augmentation. Spine J 8:875–881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maruo K, Ha Y, Inoue S et al (2013) Predictive factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in long fusions to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E1469–E1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee GA, Betz RR, Clements DH 3rd, Huss GK (1999) Proximal kyphosis after posterior spinal fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:795–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bernhardt M, Bridwell KH (1989) Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:717–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Glattes RC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Rinella A, Edwards C II (2005) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion: incidence, outcomes, and risk factor analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:1643–1649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG (1990) Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 72:328–333Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Helgeson MD, Shah SA, Newton PO et al (2010) Evaluation of proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following pedicle screw, hook, or hybrid instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:177–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Shaughnessy BA, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2012) Does a long-fusion “T3-sacrum” portend a worse outcome than a short-fusion “T10-sacrum” in primary surgery for adult scoliosis? Spine 37:884–890PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cho SK et al (2013) Proximal junctional kyphosis in primary adult deformity surgery: evaluation of 20° as a critical angle. Neurosurgery 72:899–906PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sacramento-Dominguez C, Vayas-Diez R, Coll-Mesa L et al (2009) Reproducibility measuring the angle of proximal junctional kyphosis using the first or the second vertebra above the upper instrumented vertebrae in patients surgically treated for scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2787–2791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Glattes CR, Rhim S, Cheh G (2008) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2179–2184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yagi M, King AB, Boachie-Adjei O (2012) Incidence, risk factors, and natural course of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Minimum 5 years of follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:1479–1489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kim HJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2013) Proximal junctional kyphosis results in inferior SRS pain subscores in adult deformity patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:896–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rhim S, Kim YW (2007) Is the T9, T11, or L1 the more reliable proximal level after adult lumbar or lumbosacral instrumented fusion to L5 or S1? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2653–2661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kuhns CA, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2007) Thoracolumbar deformity arthrodesis stopping at L5: fate of the L5–S1 disc, minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2771–2776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scheer JK, Lafage V, Smith JS, et al. (2014) Maintenance of radiographic correction at 2 years following lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy is superior with upper thoracic compared with thoracolumbar junction upper instrumented vertebra. Eur Spine JGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fujimori T, Inoue S, Le H et al (2014) Long fusion from sacrum to thoracic spine for adult spinal deformity with sagittal imbalance: upper versus lower thoracic spine as site of upper instrumented vertebra. Neurosurg Focus 36:E9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim HJ, Boachie-Adjei O, Shaffrey CI et al (2014) Upper thoracic versus lower thoracic upper instrumented vertebrae endpoints have similar outcomes and complications in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:E795–E799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ha Y, Maruo K, Racine L et al (2013) Proximal junctional kyphosis and clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery with fusion from the thoracic spine to the sacrum: a comparison of proximal and distal upper instrumented vertebrae. J Neurosurg Spine 19:360–369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cheh G, Baldus C (2007) Results of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2189–2197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smith MW, Annis P, Lawrence BD, Daubs MD, Brodke DS (2013) Early proximal junctional failure in patients with preoperative sagittal imbalance. Evid Based Spine Care J 4:163–164PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yagi M, Rahm M, Gaines R et al (2014) Characterization and surgical outcomes of proximal junctional failure in surgically treated patients with adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:E607–E614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hart R, McCarthy I, O’Brien M et al (2013) Identification of decision criteria for revision surgery among patients with proximal junctional failure after surgical treatment of spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E1223–E1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rose PS, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2009) Role of pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, and patient factors on sagittal plane correction following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:785–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cammarata M, Aubin CE, Wang X, Mac-Thiong JM (2014) Biomechanical risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis: a detailed numerical analysis of surgical instrumentation variables. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:E500–E507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Thawrani DP, Glos DL, Coombs MT, Bylski-Austrow DI, Sturm PF (2014) Transverse process hooks at upper instrumented vertebra provide more gradual motion transition than pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:E826–E832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH et al (2007) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after 3 different types of posterior segmental spinal instrumentation and fusions: incidence and risk factor analysis of 410 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2731–2738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yalcin N, Ozturk A, Ozkan Y et al (2011) The effects of zoledronic acid and hyperbaric oxygen on posterior lumbar fusion in a rabbit model. J Bone Jt Surg Br 93:793–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Koo KH, Lee JH, Chang BS, Lee CK (2012) Effects of alendronate on lumbar posterolateral fusion using hydroxyapatite in rabbits. Artif Organs 36:1047–1055PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hirsch BP, Unnanuntana A, Cunningham ME, Lane JM (2013) The effect of therapies for osteoporosis on spine fusion: a systematic review. Spine J 13:190–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nagahama K, Kanayama M, Togawa D, Hashimoto T, Minami A (2011) Does alendronate disturb the healing process of posterior lumbar interbody fusion? A prospective randomized trial. J Neurosurg Spine 14:500–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nakao S, Minamide A, Kawakami M, Boden SD, Yoshida M (2011) The influence of alendronate on spine fusion in an osteoporotic animal model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:1446–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Takahata M, Ito M, Abe Y, Abumi K, Minami A (2008) The effect of anti-resorptive therapies on bone graft healing in an ovariectomized rat spinal arthrodesis model. Bone 43:1057–1066PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Urrutia J, Briceno J, Carmona M, Olavarria F, Hodgson F (2010) Effect of a single dose of pamidronate administered at the time of surgery in a rabbit posterolateral spinal fusion model. Eur Spine J 19:940–944PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bransford R, Goergens E, Briody J, Amanat N, Cree A, Little D (2007) Effect of zoledronic acid in an L6–L7 rabbit spine fusion model. Eur Spine J 16:557–562PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Huang RC, Khan SN, Sandhu HS et al (2005) Alendronate inhibits spine fusion in a rat model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2516–2522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Babat LB, McLain R, Milks R, Ferrara L, Sohn MJ (2005) The effects of the antiresorptive agents calcitonin and pamidronate on spine fusion in a rabbit model. Spine J 5:542–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Xue Q, Li H, Zou X et al (2005) The influence of alendronate treatment and bone graft volume on posterior lateral spine fusion in a porcine model. Spine 30:1116–1121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Xue Q, Li H, Zou X et al (2005) Healing properties of allograft from alendronate-treated animal in lumbar spine interbody cage fusion. Eur Spine J 14:222–226PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lehman RA Jr, Kuklo TR, Freedman BA, Cowart JR, Mense MG, Riew KD (2004) The effect of alendronate sodium on spinal fusion: a rabbit model. Spine J 4:36–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ohtori S, Inoue G, Orita S et al (2013) Comparison of teriparatide and bisphosphonate treatment to reduce pedicle screw loosening after lumbar spinal fusion surgery in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis from a bone quality perspective. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E487–E492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ohtori S, Inoue G, Orita S et al (2012) Teriparatide accelerates lumbar posterolateral fusion in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:E1464–E1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ming N, Cheng JT, Rui YF et al (2012) Dose-dependent enhancement of spinal fusion in rats with teriparatide (PTH[1-34]). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:1275–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lehman RA Jr, Dmitriev AE, Cardoso MJ et al (2010) Effect of teriparatide [rhPTH(1,34)] and calcitonin on intertransverse process fusion in a rabbit model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:146–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ha Y, Maruo K, Racine L et al (2013) Proximal junctional kyphosis and clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery with fusion from the thoracic spine to the sacrum: a comparison of proximal and distal upper instrumented vertebrae. J Neurosurg Spine 19:360–369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Cahill PJ, Wang W, Asghar J et al (2012) The use of a transition rod may prevent proximal junctional kyphosis in the thoracic spine after scoliosis surgery: a finite element analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:E687–E695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Anand N, Rosemann R, Khalsa B, Baron EM (2010) Mid-term to long-term clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive correction and fusion for adults with scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 28:E6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Anand N, Baron EM, Khandehroo B, Kahwaty S (2013) Long-term 2- to 5-year clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1566–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hart R, McCarthy I, O’Brien M et al (2013) Identification of decision criteria for revision surgery among patients with proximal junctional failure following surgical treatment for spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E1223–E1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    McClendon J Jr, O’Shaughnessy BA, Sugrue PA et al (2012) Techniques for operative correction of proximal junctional kyphosis of the upper thoracic spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:292–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel K. Cho
    • 1
  • John I. Shin
    • 1
  • Yongjung J. Kim
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryColumbia University College of Physicians and SurgeonsNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations