Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 23, Issue 10, pp 2046–2058 | Cite as

Low back pain in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of conservative interventions

  • Zoe A. MichaleffEmail author
  • Steven J. Kamper
  • Christopher G. Maher
  • Roni Evans
  • Carolyn Broderick
  • Nicholas Henschke
Review Article

Abstract

Purpose

To identify and evaluate the effectiveness of conservative treatment approaches used in children and adolescents to manage and prevent low back pain (LBP).

Methods

Five electronic databases and the reference lists of systematic reviews were searched for relevant studies. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were considered eligible for inclusion if they enrolled a sample of children or adolescents (<18 years old) and evaluated the effectiveness of any conservative intervention to treat or prevent LBP. Two authors independently screened search results, extracted data, assessed risk of bias using the PEDro scale, and rated the quality of evidence using the GRADE criteria.

Results

Four RCTs on intervention and eleven RCTs on prevention of LBP were included. All included studies had a high risk of bias scoring ≤7 on the PEDro scale. For the treatment of LBP, a supervised exercise program compared to no treatment improved the average pain intensity over the past month by 2.9 points (95 % CI 1.6–4.1) measured by a 0–10 scale (2 studies; n = 125). For the prevention of LBP, there was moderate quality evidence to suggest back education and promotion programs are not effective in reducing LBP prevalence in children and adolescents.

Conclusions

While exercise interventions appear to be promising to treat LBP in children and adolescents, there is a dearth of research data relevant to paediatric populations. Future studies conducted in children and adolescents with LBP should incorporate what has been learnt from adult LBP research and be of rigorous methodological quality.

Keywords

Low back pain Systematic review Children Adolescents 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None of the authors involved in the preparation of this manuscript have any potential, perceived or real conflict to disclose.

Supplementary material

586_2014_3461_MOESM1_ESM.doc (66 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 66 kb).

References

  1. 1.
    Woolf A, Pfleger B (2003) Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 81:646–656PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jeffries L, Milanese S, Grimmer-Somers K (2007) Epidemiology of adolescent spinal pain a systematic overview of the research literature. Spine 32:2630–2637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Briggs A, Buchbinder R (2009) Back pain: a national health priority area in Australia? Med J Aust 190:499–502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balagué F et al (1995) Low back pain in schoolchildren: a study of familial and psychological factors. Spine 20:1265–1270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Taimela S et al (1997) The prevalence of low back pain among children and adolescents: a nationwide, Cohort-Based Questionnaire Survey in Finland. Spine 22:1132–1136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    King S et al (2011) The epidemiology of chronic pain in children and adolescents revisited: a systematic review. Pain 152:2729–2738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Watson K et al (2002) Low back pain in schoolchildren: occurrence and characteristics. Pain 97:87–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ochsmann E et al (2010) Prevalence of diagnosis and direct treatment costs of back disorders in 644,773 children and youths in Germany. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 11:193PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hestbaek L, Leboeuf-Yde C, Kyvik K (2006) Are lifestyle-factors in adolescence predictors for adult low back pain? A cross-sectional and prospective study of young twins. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 7:27PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kosseim M, Rein R, McShane C (2008) Implementing evidence-based physiotherapy practice for treating children with low back pain: are we there yet? Pediatr Phys Ther 20:179–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jebaseelan DD et al (2012) Sensitivity studies of pediatric material properties on juvenile lumbar spine responses using finite element analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput 50:515–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Junewick JJ (2010) Cervical spine injuries in pediatrics: are children small adults or not? Pediatr Radiol 40:493–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koes BW et al (2010) An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J 19:2075–2094PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Steele EJ, Dawson AP, Hiller JE (2006) School-based interventions for spinal pain: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:226–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Calvo-Munoz I, Gomez-Conesa A, Sanchez-Meca J (2013) Physical therapy treatments for low back pain in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14:55PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Furlan AD et al (2009) 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine 34:1929–1941PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Macedo LG et al (2010) There was evidence of convergent and construct validity of Physiotherapy Evidence Database quality scale for physiotherapy trials. J Clin Epidemiol 63:920–925PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maher CG et al (2003) Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 83:713–721PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Atkins D et al (2004) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328:1490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Adams R et al (2002) Recommendations for improving the quality of care through stroke centers and systems: an examination of stroke center identification options: multidisciplinary consensus recommendations from the Advisory Working Group on Stroke Center Identification Options of the American Stroke Association. Stroke 33:e1–e7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Henschke N et al (2010) Behavioural treatment for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD002014PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Guyatt GH et al (2011) GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence–imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1283–1293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guyatt GH et al (2008) Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336:924PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jones M et al (2007) The efficacy of exercise as an intervention to treat recurrent nonspecific low back pain in adolescents. Pediatr Exerc Sci 19:349–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jones MA et al (2007) Recurrent non-specific low-back pain in adolescents: the role of exercise. Ergonomics 50:1680–1688PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fanucchi GL et al (2009) Exercise reduces the intensity and prevalence of low back pain in 12–13 year old children: a randomised trial. Aust J Physiother 55:97–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ahlqwist A et al (2008) Physical therapy treatment of back complaints on children and adolescents. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:E721–E727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Candy EA et al (2012) Effect of a high-density foam seating wedge on back pain intensity when used by 14 to 16-year-old school students: a randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy 98:301–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bauer DH, Freivalds A (2009) Backpack load limit recommendation for middle school students based on physiological and psychophysical measurements. Work 32:339–350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cardon GM et al (2007) Back education in elementary schoolchildren: the effects of adding a physical activity promotion program to a back care program. Eur Spine J 16:125–133PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dolphens M et al (2011) Long-term effectiveness of a back education programme in elementary schoolchildren: an 8-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J 20:2134–2142PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Feingold AJ, Jacobs K (2002) The effect of education on backpack wearing and posture in a middle school population. Work 18:287–294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gallardo Vidal M, Rodríguez Barrientos R, Borda Olivas A (2012) Evaluación de la efectividad de una intervención educativa para disminuir el peso de la mochila escolar en los alumnos de 3. y 4. de educación primaria. FisioterapiaGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Geldhof E et al (2006) Effects of a two-school-year multifactorial back education program in elementary schoolchildren. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:1965–1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Geldhof E et al (2007) Back posture education in elementary schoolchildren: a 2-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J 16:841–850PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kovacs F et al (2011) Improving schoolchildren’s knowledge of methods for the prevention and management of low back pain: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E505–E512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Linton SJ et al (1994) The effects of ergonomically designed school furniture on pupils’ attitudes, symptoms and behaviour. Appl Ergon 25:299–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Moreira RF et al (2012) Effects of a school based exercise program on children’s resistance and flexibility. Work 41(Suppl 1):922–928PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Spence SM, Jensen GM, Shepard KF (1984) Comparison of methods of teaching children proper lifting techniques. Phys Ther 64:1055–1061PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vidal J et al (2013) Effects of a postural education program on school backpack habits related to low back pain in children. Eur Spine J 22:782–787PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Verhagen AP et al (1998) The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1235–1241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 323:42PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hayden JA et al (2005) Meta-analysis: exercise therapy for nonspecific low back pain. Ann Intern Med 142:765–775PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    McGrath PJ et al (2008) Core outcome domains and measures for pediatric acute and chronic/recurrent pain clinical trials: PedIMMPACT recommendations. J Pain 9:771–783PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zoe A. Michaleff
    • 1
    Email author
  • Steven J. Kamper
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christopher G. Maher
    • 1
  • Roni Evans
    • 3
  • Carolyn Broderick
    • 4
  • Nicholas Henschke
    • 5
  1. 1.The George Institute for Global Health and Sydney Medical School, The University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Wolfe-Harris Center for Clinical Studies, Northwestern Health Sciences UniversityMinneapolisUSA
  4. 4.School of Medical Sciences, UNSW Medicine, Children’s Hospital Institute of Sports MedicineUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney Children’s Hospital NetworkSydneyAustralia
  5. 5.Institute of Public HealthUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations