European Spine Journal

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 94–100 | Cite as

Internal fixation with occipital hooks construct for occipito-cervical arthrodesis. Results in 14 young or small children

  • Thierry Odent
  • Rony Bou Ghosn
  • Jean-Paul Dusabe
  • Michel Zerah
  • Christophe Glorion
Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

Purpose

Evaluation of effectiveness of internal rigid fixation for occipito-cervical fusion with occipital hooks and cervical screws and/or hooks to improve fusion in young or small children with various bone dysplasia or congenital abnormality.

Methods

Fourteen children with mean age of 8.4 years and height and weight below 140 cm and 35 kg, respectively, who underwent occipito-cervical fusion for miscellaneous pathologies reading to stenosis and/or instability were reviewed. The posterior instrumentation consisted of a precontoured titanium plate rod with an occipital fixation by hooks and a vertebral fixation by screws and/or hooks. Eight patients had cervical fixation with C2 pedicle screws. The mean follow-up was 48 months (27–81 months).

Results

Thirteen patients (92.8 %) had a complete fusion and no failure of the fixation was observed. We had two deep wound infections not related to implants.

Conclusion

Instrumentation was technically feasible even in a very young child. Rigid internal fixation in the little children did not increase surgical complications and significantly increased the union rate of occipito-cervical arthrodesis.

Keywords

Occipito-cervical fusion Occipital hook fixation Children C2 pedicle srews Bone dysplasia 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Dogan S et al (2006) Pediatric subaxial cervical spine injuries: origins, management, and outcome in 51 patients. Neurosurg Focus 20(2):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hadley MN et al (1988) Pediatric spinal trauma. Review of 122 cases of spinal cord and vertebral column injuries. J Neurosurg 68(1):18–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahmed R, Traynelis VC, Menezes AH (2008) Fusions at the craniovertebral junction. Childs Nerv Syst 24(10):1209–1224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abumi K et al (1999) One-stage posterior decompression and reconstruction of the cervical spine by using pedicle screw fixation systems. J Neurosurg 90(1 Suppl):19–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adeloye A, Kattan KR, Silverman FN (1975) Thickness of the normal skull in the American Blacks and Whites. Am J Phys Anthropol 43(1):23–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fagerstrom T, Hedlund R (2002) Cotrel Dubousset instrumentation in occipito-cervico-thoracic fusion. Eur Spine J 11(4):364–374PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koop SE, Winter RB, Lonstein JE (1984) The surgical treatment of instability of the upperpart of the cervical spine in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66(3):403–411PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Letts M, Slutsky D (1990) Occipitocervical arthrodesis in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72(8):1166–1170PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roy L, Gibson DA (1970) Cervical spine fusions in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 73:146–151PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee PC, Chun SY, Leong JC (1984) Experience of posterior surgery in atlanto-axial instability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9(3):231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grantham SA et al (1969) Occipitocervical arthrodesis. Indications, technic and results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 65:118–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Itoh T et al (1988) Occipito-cervical fusion reinforced by Luque’s segmental spinal 1 instrumentation for rheumatoid diseases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13(11):1234–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Flint GA, Hockley AD (1987) Internal fixation for atlanto-axial instability in children. Childs Nerv Syst 3(6):368–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Higo M et al (1995) Occipitocervical fusion by Luque loop rod instrumentation in Down syndrome. J Pediatr Orthop 15(4):539–542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brockmeyer DL, Apfelbaum RI (1999) A new occipitocervical fusion construct in pediatric patients with occipitocervical instability. Technical note. J Neurosurg 90(2 Suppl):271–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parisini P et al (2003) C1–C2 posterior fusion in growing patients: long term follow up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(6):566–572 (discussion 572)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ebraheim NA et al (1996) An anatomic study of the thickness of the occipital bone. Implications 10 for occipitocervical instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21(15):1725–1729 (discussion 1729–1730)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Faure A et al (2002) Inverted-hook occipital clamp system in occipitocervical fixation. Technical note. J Neurosurg 97(1 Suppl):135–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abumi K et al (2000) Complications of pedicle screw fixation in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(8):962–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jeanneret B, Gebhard JS, Magerl F (1994) Transpedicular screw fixation 1 of articular mass fracture-separation: results of an anatomical study and operative technique. J Spinal Disord 7(3):222–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Panjabi MM et al (1991) Cervical human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of the middle and lower regions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16(8):861–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Howington JU, Kruse JJ, Awasthi D (2001) Surgical anatomy of the C-2 pedicle. J Neurosurg 95(1 Suppl):88–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McCullen GM, Garfin SR (2000) Spine update: cervical spine internal fixation using screw and screw-plate constructs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(5):643–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ludwig SC et al (2000) Cervical pedicle screws: comparative accuracy of two insertion techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(20):2675–2681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Geck MJ et al (2014) Feasibility of rigid upper cervical instrumentation in children: tomographic analysis of children aged 2 to 6. J Spinal Disord Tech 27(3):110–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thierry Odent
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rony Bou Ghosn
    • 1
  • Jean-Paul Dusabe
    • 1
  • Michel Zerah
    • 3
  • Christophe Glorion
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric OrthopedicsHôpital Universitaire Necker Enfants Malades, Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de ParisParis Cedex 15France
  2. 2.INSERM UMR-S 747 Pharmacologie, toxicologie et signalisation cellulaire, Université Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris CitéParisFrance
  3. 3.Service de neurochirurgie pédiatriqueHôpital Universitaire Necker Enfants Malades, Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de ParisParis Cedex 15France

Personalised recommendations