European Spine Journal

, Volume 23, Issue 9, pp 1968–1977 | Cite as

Recovery of severe motor deficit secondary to herniated lumbar disc prolapse: is surgical intervention important? A systematic review

  • V. R. BalajiEmail author
  • K. F. Chin
  • S. Tucker
  • L. F. Wilson
  • A. T. Casey
Review Article



The natural history of motor deficit due to lumbar disc herniation has been thought to be favourable. However, on closer analysis of seminal articles on this topic, this is not the case for patients with severe motor deficits (MRC grade ≤3). The aim of this study is to answer the following questions: (1) Is surgical intervention beneficial in patients with severe motor weakness (defined by MRC grade of 3 or less) due to herniated lumbar nucleus pulposus? (2) Does time to surgery from onset of motor weakness influence the outcome? (3) Are there any other prognostic factors?

Materials and Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1970 upto July 2013. Inclusion criteria for studies are: (1) minimum of three patients aged 18 and older, who had symptomatic herniated lumbar disc prolapse and underwent surgery, (2) description of pre and post-operative muscle weakness utilising the Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle power grade or equivalent, such that both reviewers could confidently identify a cohort of patients with at least grade three motor weakness or worse, (3) a minimum of 6 months follow-up.


Seven studies were identified with a total of 354 patients. Complete recovery was seen in 38.4 % of patients following surgery and 32 % following non-operative treatment. Age and grade of motor deficit were identified as significant prognostic factors in some of the studies.


The current available evidence is not robust enough to address the questions posed. We have proposed a framework for future studies.


Motor deficit Systematic review Surgery Prognostic factors 


Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    Mixtar WJ, Barr JS (1934) Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med 211:210–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peul WC, van Houwelingen HC, van den Hout WB, Brand R, Eekhof JA, Tans JT, Thomeer RT, Koes BW, Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group (2007) Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica. N Engl J Med 356(22):2245–2256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hakelius A (1970) Prognosis in sciatica. A clinical follow-up of surgical and non-surgical treatment. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 129:1–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 8(2):131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weber H (1975) The effect of delayed disc surgery on muscular paresis. Acta Orthop Scand 46(4):631–642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ryan R, HS Broclain D, Horey D, Oliver S, Prictor M (2007) Cochrane consumers & communication review group: study quality guide p 1–50Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buttermann GR (2004) Treatment of lumbar disc herniation: epidural steroid injection compared with discectomy. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86A:670–679Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dubourg G, Rozenberg S, Fautrel B, Valls-Bellec I, Bissery A, Lang T, Faillot T, Duplan B, Briançon D, Levy-Weil F, Morlock G, Crouzet J, Gatfosse M, Bonnet C, Houvenagel E, Hary S, Brocq O, Poiraudeau S, Beaudreuil J, de Sauverzac C, Durieux S, Levade MH, Esposito P, Maitrot D, Goupille P, Valat JP, Bourgeois P (2002) A pilot study on the recovery from paresis after lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(13):1426–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ghahreman A, Ferch RD, Rao P, Chandran N, Shadbolt B (2009) Recovery of ankle dorsiflexion weakness following lumbar decompressive surgery. J Clin Neurosci 16(8):1024–1027PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Iizuka Y, Iizuka H, Tsutsumi S, Nakagawa Y, Nakajima T, Sorimachi Y, Ara T, Nishinome M, Seki T, Shida K, Takagishi K (2009) Foot drop due to lumbar degenerative conditions: mechanism and prognostic factors in herniated nucleus pulposus and lumbar spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine 10(3):260–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jönsson B, Strömqvist B (1995) Motor affliction of the L5 nerve root in lumbar nerve root compression syndromes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(18):2012–2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Postacchini F, Giannicola G, Cinotti G (2002) Recovery of motor deficits after microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(7):1040–1045PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eysel P, Rompe JD, Hopf C (1994) Prognostic criteria of discogenic paresis. Eur Spine J 3(4):214–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sarikcioglu L, Yaba A, Tanriover G, Demirtop A, Demir N, Ozkan O (2007) Effect of severe crush injury on axonal regeneration: a functional and ultrastructural study. J Reconstr Microsurg 23(3):143–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pham K, Gupta R (2009) Understanding the mechanisms of entrapment neuropathies. Review article. Neurosurg Focus 26(2):E7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jancalek R, Dubovy P (2007) An experimental animal model of spinal root compression syndrome: an analysis of morphological changes of myelinated axons during compression radiculopathy and after decompression. Exp Brain Res 179(1):111–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Verdú E, Ceballos D, Vilches JJ, Navarro X (2000) Influence of aging on peripheral nerve function and regeneration. J Peripher Nerv Syst 5(4):191–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aono H, Iwasaki M, Ohwada T, Okuda S, Hosono N, Fuji T, Yoshikawa H (2007) Surgical outcome of drop foot caused by degenerative lumbar diseases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(8):E262–E266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Matsui H, Kanamori M, Kawaguchi Y, Kitagawa H, Nakamura H, Tsuji H (1997) Clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics of compressed lumbar nerve roots. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22(18):2100–2105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, Huang RC, Parvataneni HK, Tsairis P (2002) Improvement of preoperative foot drop after lumbar surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 15(6):490–494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gioia G, Mandelli D, Capaccioni B, Randelli F, Tessari L (1999) Surgical treatment of far lateral lumbar disc herniation. Identification of compressed root and discectomy by lateral approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(18):1952–1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Blaauw G, Braakman R, Gelpke GJ, Singh R (1988) Changes in radicular function following low-back surgery. J Neurosurg 69(5):649–652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guigui P, Benoist M, Delecourt C, Delhoume J, Deburge A (1998) Motor deficit in lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study of a series of 50 patients. J Spinal Disord 11(4):283–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. R. Balaji
    • 1
    Email author
  • K. F. Chin
    • 1
  • S. Tucker
    • 1
  • L. F. Wilson
    • 1
  • A. T. Casey
    • 1
  1. 1.Royal National Orthopaedic HospitalMiddlesexUK

Personalised recommendations