Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 23, Issue 11, pp 2255–2262 | Cite as

Progressive kyphotic deformity in comminuted burst fractures treated non-operatively: the Achilles tendon of the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS)

  • Tobias A. MatteiEmail author
  • Joseph Hanovnikian
  • Dzung H. Dinh
Grand Rounds

Abstract Open image in new window

Introduction

The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS) scale has been considered one of the best available grading systems for evaluating thoracolumbar fractures, especially due to the fact that, differently from previous classifications, it can be used as a practical algorithm to orient the clinical decision-making between conservative and surgical management.

Case report

The authors describe a case of a 54-year-old patient presenting with low-back pain after having struck her back on the handrail. The neurological exam was unremarkable. The CT-scan of the lumbar spine demonstrated a L1 comminuted burst fracture. The MRI demonstrated no evidence of posterior ligamentous complex injury. According to the TLICS classification (total score of 2) the patient was managed conservatively with a thoracolumbar brace. Although at the 1-month follow-up the X-rays demonstrated no major changes and the pain had clinically improved, the patient was lost to follow-up. After 12 months the patient presented back to the emergency department with complaints of increased back pain. The repeat CT-scan demonstrated a remarkable worsening of the vertebral body fracture, with a major kyphotic deformity. The patient was submitted to a staged anterior–posterior procedure consisting in posterior decompression of the T12–L2 levels, a T10–L4 pedicle screw fixation and, finally, a lateral transpsoas approach for L1 corpectomy and reconstruction with an expandable interbody cage and plate fixation. At the 6-months follow-up, the patient presented another episode of back pain and a new L4 endplate fracture was identified. After 2 months of failed conservative treatment, the patient was treated with percutaneous kyphoplasty. At the 12-months follow-up after the initial surgical procedure, the patient was pain free and with stable radiographs.

Conclusions

In this Grand Rounds presentation, the authors perform a comprehensive discussion about the historical developments in the classification systems for thoracolumbar fractures with special emphasis in the new TLICS system. Although such score presents several advantages in relation to other grading systems, patients with comminuted burst fractures deserve special attention, even if initially classified as non-operative according to the TLICS algorithm. In such cases, if a decision of conservative management is taken, a close follow-up is recommended due to the high likelihood of long-term kyphotic deformity.

Keywords

Thoracolumbar fractures TLICS Kyphotic deformity Burst fractures Thoracolumbar Injury Classification Severity scale 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests. No financial or material support was received for the production of this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Böhler L (1929) The treatment of fractures (A translation of “Technik der Knochenbruchbehandlung im Frieden und im Kriege” by E. Vienna). Wilhelm Maudrich, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Watson-Jones R (1938) The results of postural reduction of fractures of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 20:567–586Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nicoll EA (1949) Fractures of the dorso-lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 31(3):376–394Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sethi MK, Schoenfeld AJ, Bono CM, Harris MB (2009) The evolution of thoracolumbar injury classification systems. Spine J 9(9):780–788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holdsworth FW (1963) Fractures, dislocations and fracture-dislocations of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 45:6–20Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Louis R (1985) Spinal stability as defined by the three-column spine concept. Anat Clin 7(1):33–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Denis F (1983) The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine 8(8):817–831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Muller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P et al (1990) The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3(4):184–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aebi M (2010) Classification of thoracolumbar fractures and dislocations. Eur Spine J 19(Suppl 1):S2–S7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reinhold M, Audigé L, Schnake KJ, Bellabarba C, Dai LY, Oner FC (2013) AO spine injury classification system: a revision proposal for the thoracic and lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 22(10):2184–2201PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vaccaro AR, Lehman RA Jr, Hurlbert RJ, Anderson PA, Harris M, Hedlund R, Harrop J, Dvorak M, Wood K, Fehlings MG, Fisher C, Zeiller SC, Anderson DG, Bono CM, Stock GH, Brown AK, Kuklo T, Oner FC (2005) A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status. Spine 30(20):2325–2333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Patel AA, Dailey A, Brodke DS, Daubs M, Harrop J, Whang PG, Vaccaro AR (2009) Thoracolumbar spine trauma classification: the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score system and case examples. J Neurosurg Spine 10(3):201–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vaccaro AR, Oner C, Kepler CK, Dvorak M, Schnake K, Bellabarba C, Reinhold M, Aarabi B, Kandziora F, Chapman J, Shanmuganathan R, Fehlings M, Vialle L (2013) AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status and key modifiers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(23):2028–2037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McAfee PC, Yuan HA, Lasda NA (1982) The unstable burst fracture. Spine 7(4):365–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McCormack T, Karaikovic E, Gaines RW (1994) The load sharing classification of spine fractures. Spine 19(15):1741–1744PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Joaquim AF, Daubs MD, Lawrence BD, Brodke DS, Cendes F, Tedeschi H, Patel AA (2013) Retrospective evaluation of the validity of the thoracolumbar injury classification system in 458 consecutively treated patients. Spine J 13(12):1760–1765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Verheyden AP, Hölzl A, Ekkerlein H, Gercek E, Hauck S, Josten C, Kandziora F, Katscher S, Knop C, Lehmann W, Meffert R, Müller CW, Partenheimer A, Schinkel C, Schleicher P, Schnake KJ, Scholz M, Ulrich C (2011) Recommendations for the treatment of thoracolumbar and lumbar spine injuries. Unfallchirurg 114:9–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tobias A. Mattei
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joseph Hanovnikian
    • 2
  • Dzung H. Dinh
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryBrain & Spine Center - InvisionHealthWilliamsvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of Illinois at PeoriaPeoriaUSA

Personalised recommendations