Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 528–532 | Cite as

Risk factors for wound infection in surgery for spinal metastasis

  • S. Kumar
  • D. van Popta
  • R. Rodrigues-Pinto
  • J. Stephenson
  • S. Mohammad
  • I. Siddique
  • R. R. VermaEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Wound infection rates are generally higher in patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastasis. Risk factors of wound infection in these patients are poorly understood.

Purpose

To identify demographic and clinical variables that may be associated with patients experiencing a higher wound infection rate.

Study design

Retrospective study with prospectively collected data of spinal metastasis patients operated consecutively at a University Teaching Hospital, adult spine division which is a tertiary referral centre for complex spinal surgery.

Patient sample

Ninety-eight patients were all surgically treated, consecutively from January 2009 to September 2011. Three patients had to be excluded due to inadequate data.

Outcome measures

Physiological measures, with presence or absence of microbiologically proven infection.

Methods

Various demographic and clinical data were recorded, including age, serum albumin level, blood total lymphocyte count, corticosteroid intake, Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) score, neurological disability, skin closure material used, levels of surgery and administration of peri-operative corticosteroids. No funding was received from any sources for this study and as far as we are aware, there are no potential conflict of interest-associated biases in this study.

Results

Higher probabilities of infection were associated with low albumin level, seven or more levels of surgery, use of delayed/non-absorbable skin closure material and presence of neurological disability. Of these factors, levels of surgery were found to be statistically significant at the 5 % significance level.

Conclusion

Risk of infection is high (17.9 %) in patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastasis. Seven or more vertebral levels of surgery increase the risk of infection significantly (p < 0.05). Low albumin level and presence of neurological disability appear to show a trend towards increased risk of infection. Use of absorbable skin closure material, age, low lymphocyte count, peri-operative administration of corticosteroids and MUST score do not appear to influence the risk of infection.

Keywords

Spinal metastases Spine tumour Spinal wound infections Surgical complications 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Pull ter Gunne AF, van Laarhoven CJ, Cohen DB (2010) Incidence of surgical site infection following adult spinal deformity surgery: an analysis of patient risk. Eur Spine J 19(6):982–988CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McPhee I, Williams R, Swanson C (1998) Factors influencing wound healing after surgery for metastatic disease of the spine. Spine 23(6):726–732CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Majeed H, Kumar S, Bommireddy R, Klezl Z, Calthorpe D (2012) Accuracy of prognostic scores in decision making and predicting outcomes in metastatic spine disease. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 94(1):28–33CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Demura S, Kawahara N, Murakami H, Nambu K, Kato S, Yoshioka K, Okayama T, Tomita K (2009) Surgical site infection in spinal metastasis. Spine 34(6):635–639CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pascal-Moussellard H, Broc G, Pointillart V, Simeon F, Vital J, Senegas J (1998) Complications of vertebral metastasis surgery. Eur Spine J 7(6):438–444CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wise J, Fischgrund S, Herkowitz H, Montgomery D, Kurz L (1999) Complication, survival rates, and risk factors of surgery for metastatic disease of the spine. Spine 24(18):1943–1951CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Omeis IA, Dhir M, Sciubba DM, Gottfried ON, McGirt MJ, Attenello FJ, Wolinsky JP, Gokasalan ZL (2011) Postoperative surgical site infections in patients undergoing spinal tumor surgery: incidence and risk factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(17):1410–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (‘MUST’) (2003) BAPEN. ISBN 1 899467 85 8Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    The ‘MUST’ explanatory booklet: a guide to the ‘Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool’ (‘MUST’) for Adults (2003) BAPEN. ISBN 1 899467 65 3Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    NHS National Institute for Health & Clinical Excellence (2008) NICE clinical guideline 75 for metastatic spinal cord compressionGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Greene KA, Wilde AH, Stulberg BN (1991) Preoperative nutritional status of total joint patients. Relationship to postoperative wound complications. J Arthroplasty 6(4):321–325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sarhill N, Mahmood F, Walsh D, Nelson KA, Komurcu S, Davis M, LeGrand S, Abdullah O, Rybicki L (2003) Evaluation of nutritional status in advanced metastatic cancer. Support Care Cancer 2003(11):652–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grzegorzewska A, Leander M (2005) Total lymphocyte count and subpopulation lymphocyte counts in relation to dietary intake and nutritional status of peritoneal dialysis patients. Adv Perit Dial 2005(21):35–40Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dickhaut S, DeLee J, Page C (1984) Nutritional status: importance in predicting wound-healing after amputation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66(1):71–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boriani S, Bandiera S, Donthineni R, Amendola L, Cappuccio M, De Iure F, Gasbarrini A (2010) Morbidity of en bloc resections in the spine. Eur Spine J 19(2):231–241CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Kumar
    • 1
  • D. van Popta
    • 1
  • R. Rodrigues-Pinto
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. Stephenson
    • 3
  • S. Mohammad
    • 1
  • I. Siddique
    • 1
  • R. R. Verma
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Spinal SurgerySalford Royal Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLancashireUK
  2. 2.Department of OrthopaedicsCentro Hospitalar Do Porto-Hospital De Santo AntónioPortoPortugal
  3. 3.School of Human and Health SciencesUniversity of HuddersfieldHuddersfieldUK

Personalised recommendations