Spinal angiolipoma: etiology, imaging findings, classification, treatment, and prognosis
- 378 Downloads
To summarise our experience treating patients with spinal angiolipomas (SAs) and to evaluate factors relating to its prognosis.
We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients diagnosed with SAs who received surgical treatment from January 2001 to February 2013.
Twenty-one patients were described. We divide SAs into two types: “intraspinal” and “dumbbell-shaped”. The former were further subclassified as “with lipomatosis” and “without lipomatosis”. Overweight people are more likely to get the “with lipomatosis” type which needs different surgical strategy and/or a diet therapy to get better outcomes.
Diagnosis of SAs should be made with reference to clinical, radiological, and pathological findings. Application of different methods is needed to treat SAs.
KeywordsDiagnosis Spinal angiolipomas Prognosis Spinal tumour Treatment
Conflict of interest
- 3.Fourney DR, Tong KA, Macaulay RJB et al (2001) Spinal angiolipoma. Can J Neu Sci 28:82–88Google Scholar
- 5.Association JO (1994) Scoring system for cervical myelopathy. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 68:490–503Google Scholar
- 14.Barzin M, Maleki I (2009) Incidence of vertebral hemangioma on spinal magnetic resonance imaging in Northern Iran. Pak J Biol Sci 15;12:542–544Google Scholar
- 29.Guy R. Fogel, Paul Y. Cunningham, JDb et al.(2005) Spinal epidural lipomatosis: case reports, literature review and meta-analysis. Spine J 5:202–211Google Scholar