Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 576–583 | Cite as

Spinopelvic balance: new biomechanical insights with clinical implications for Parkinson’s disease

  • Luciano BissolottiEmail author
  • Massimiliano Gobbo
  • Jorge Hugo Villafañe
  • Stefano Negrini
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to describe the disease-related sagittal balance changes in relation to the sacropelvic morphology of PD patients with different durations of disease.

Methods

Thirty-one consecutive Parkinson’s disease patients (26 males, 5 females; age 55–83 years) participated in the cross-sectional study. The clinical assessment included: Hoehn Yahr score; plumb line distance from the spinous process of C7, kyphosis apex, spinous process of L3 and S1. Lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), spinosacral angle, spinopelvic angle, spinal tilt, pelvic incidence, sacral slope (SS) and pelvic tilt were radiographically assessed.

Results

Radiographic spinopelvic angles appeared normal, but many patients presented variations from normality. In particular, pelvic tilt increased and SS decreased; spinosacral and spinopelvic angles were greatly reduced compared to healthy people, and spinal tilt increased. Unlike TK, LL was well correlated with most of the parameters.

Conclusions

Sagittal balance evaluation provides new valuable insights for biomechanical understanding of PD patients. Specific spinal parameters (spinosacral, spinopelvic and spinal tilt angles), and their clinical correlation, as well as pelvic parameters like pelvic tilt and sacral slope, appear particularly interesting for their clinical implications in terms of spinal deformities correction in PD population.

Keywords

Sagittal Spinopelvic Parkinson’s disease Fall risk 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study has been fully conducted in the Rehabilitation Service of Fondazione Teresa Camplani-Domus Salutis Rehabilitation Hospital, Brescia, Italy.

Conflict of interest

The authors of the paper have not received specific funding to perform the research. The authors declare no conflict of interest. Luciano Bissolotti: employed at the Fondazione Teresa Camplani-Domus Salutis Rehabilitation Hospital, Brescia. Massimiliano Gobbo: employed at the Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy. Jorge Hugo Villafañe: employed at the IRCCS Fondazione Don Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy. Stefano Negrini: Professor of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Brescia, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Don Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy.

References

  1. 1.
    Roussouly P, Nnadi C (2010) Sagittal plane deformity: an overview of interpretation and management. Eur Spine J 19(11):1824–1836 (Epub 2010 Jun 22)PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, O’Brien M (2005) The importance of spino-pelvic balance in L5-S1 developmental spondylolisthesis: a review of pertinent radiologic measurements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(6 Suppl):S27–S34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Obeid I, Hauger O, Aunoble S, Bourghli A, Pellet N, Vital JM (2011) Global analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in major deformities: correlation between lack of lumbar lordosis and flexion of the knee. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):681–685PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mac-Thiong JM, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Guigui P (2010) Sagittal parameters of global spinal balance: normative values from a prospective cohort of seven hundred nine Caucasian asymptomatic adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(22):E1193–E1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mac-Thiong JM, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Guigui P (2011) Age- and sex-related variations in sagittal sacropelvic morphology and balance in asymptomatic adults. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):S572–S577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL (2011) Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):S609–S618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koller H, Acosta F, Zenner J, Ferraris L, Hitzl W, Meier O, Ondra S, Koski T, Schmidt R (2010) Spinal surgery in patients with Parkinson’s disease: experiences with the challenges posed by sagittal imbalance and the Parkinson’s spine. Spine J 19(10):1785–1794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mac-Thiong J-M, Labelle H, Charlebois M (2003) Sagittal plane analysis of the spine and pelvis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis according to the coronal curve type. Spine 28:1404–1409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tanguay F, Mac-Thiong J-M, de Guise JA (2007) Relation between the sagittal pelvic and lumbar spine geometries following surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 16:531–536PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Le Huec JC, Charosky S, Barrey C, Rigal J, Aunoble S (2011) Sagittal imbalance cascade for simple degenerative spine and consequences: algorithm of decision for appropriate treatment. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):S699–S703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Upadhyaya CD, Starr PA, Mummaneni PV (2010) Spinal deformity and Parkinson disease: a treatment algorithm. Neurosurg Focus 28(3):E5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barrey C, Roussouly P, Perrin G, Le Huec JC (2011) Sagittal balance disorders in severe degenerative spine. Can we identify the compensatory mechanisms? Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):626–633PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chaléat-Valayer E, Mac-Thiong JM, Paquet J, Berthonnaud E, Siani F, Roussouly P (2011) Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment in chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):634–640PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schuller S, Charles YP, Steib JP (2011) Sagittal spinopelvic alignment and body mass index in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 20(5):713–719PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stagnara P, DeMauroy JC, Dran G, Gonon G, Costanzo G, Dimnet J, Pasquet A (1982) Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in a sagittal plane: approach to references for the evaluation of kyphosis and lordosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 7(4):335–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ (1992) Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. A clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. JNNP 55:181–184Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hoehn MM, Yahr MD (1967) Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 17:427–442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Scalzo PL, Flores CR, Marques JR, Robini SC, Teixeira AL (2012) Impact of changes in balance and walking capacity on the quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 70(2):119–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kegelmeyer DA, Kloos AD, Thomas KM, Kostyk SK (2007) Reliability and validity of the Tinetti Mobility Test for individuals with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther 87(10):1369–1378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brusse KJ, Zimdars S, Zalewski KR, Steffen TM (2005) Testing functional performance in people with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther 85:134–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Horton WC, Brown CW, Bridwell KH (2005) The effect of arm position on sagittal plane alignment. Spine 30:427–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cohen J (1998) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 100–110Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kashihara K, Imamura T (2012) Clinical correlates of anterior and lateral flexion of the thoracolumbar spine and dropped head in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 18(3):290–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hammerberg EM, Wood KB (2003) Sagittal profile of the elderly. J Spinal Disord 16:44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Le Huec JC, Saddiki R, Franke J, Rigal J, Aunoble S (2011) Equilibrium of the human body and the gravity line: the basics. Eur Spine J Suppl 5:558-63Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    McLean IP, Gillan MG, Ross JC, Aspden RM, Porter RW (1996) A comparison of methods for measuring trunk list. A simple plumbline is the best. Spine 21(14):1667–1670PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zaina F, Atanasio S, Ferraro C, Fusco C, Negrini A, Romano M, Negrini S (2009) Review of rehabilitation and orthopedic conservative approach to sagittal plane diseases during growth: hyperkyphosis, junctional kyphosis, and Scheuermann disease. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 45(4):595–603PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Negrini S (2009) Focus on flexed posture and hyperkyphosis: prevention and rehabilitation to reduce disability and increase quality of life. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 45(4):567–569PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luciano Bissolotti
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Massimiliano Gobbo
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jorge Hugo Villafañe
    • 5
  • Stefano Negrini
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Rehabilitation ServiceFondazione Teresa Camplani-Casa di Cura Domus SalutisBresciaItaly
  2. 2.LARIN, Neuromuscular and Adapted Physical Activity LaboratoryBresciaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Clinical and Experimental SciencesUniversity of BresciaBresciaItaly
  4. 4.Physical and Rehabilitation MedicineUniversity of BresciaBresciaItaly
  5. 5.IRCCS Fondazione Don Gnocchi ONLUSMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations