European Spine Journal

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 129–134

The prevalence of depressive symptoms before and after surgery and its association with disability in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion

  • Marko Wahlman
  • Arja Häkkinen
  • Joost Dekker
  • Ilkka Marttinen
  • Kimmo Vihtonen
  • Marko H. Neva
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of depressive symptoms and disability pre-operatively, at 3 months and at 1 year after lumbar spine fusion surgery.

Methods

Data was extracted from a dedicated lumbar spine fusion register, giving 232 patients (mean age 62 years, 158 females) who had undergone instrumented lumbar spine fusion. The frequency of depressive symptoms and disability was evaluated using the Depression Scale (DEPS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

Results

Depressive symptoms were found in 34, 13, and 15 % of the patients pre-operatively, at 3 months and at 1 year after surgery, respectively. The mean DEPS score decreased from 16.2 to 8.6 (p < 0.001) in patients who had depressive symptoms pre-operatively, and from 6.1 to 3.8 (p < 0.001) in those patients without pre-operative depressive symptoms. The mean ODI values pre-operatively, at 3 months and at 1 year after surgery were 53, 30, and 23, respectively, in patients with pre-operative depressive symptoms and 41, 23, and 20 in those patients without pre-operative depressive symptoms. The differences between the groups were statistically significant at all time points (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

One-third of our patients with chronic back pain undergoing spinal fusion had depressive symptoms pre-operatively. The prevalence of depressive symptoms decreased after surgery. Although disability remained higher in those patients who had reported depressive symptoms pre-operatively, disability did decrease significantly in both groups post-operatively. Thus, there is no need to exclude depressive patients from operation, but screening measures and appropriate treatment practises throughout both pre-operative and post-operative periods are encouraged.

Keywords

Depressive symptoms Depression scale DEPS Disability Lumbar spine fusion Surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Dvorak J, Jacobshagen N, Semmer NK, Boos N (2007) Predictors of multidimensional outcome after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 16(6):777–786PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reme SE, Tangen T, Moe T, Eriksen HR (2011) Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in sick listed chronic low back pain patients. Eur J Pain 15(10):1075–1080PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hägg O, Fritzell P, Ekselius L, Nordwall A, Swedish Lumbar Spine Study (2003) Predictors of outcome in fusion surgery for chronic low back pain. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study. Eur Spine J 12(1):22–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Magni G (1984) Chronic low-back pain and depression: an epidemiological survey. Acta Psychiatr Scand 70(6):614–617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Polatin PB, Kinney RK, Gatchel RJ, Lillo E, Mayer TG (1993) Psychiatric illness and chronic low-back pain. The mind and the spine—which goes first? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18(1):66–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Hanscom B, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, Birkmeyer NJ, Hilibrand AS, Herkowitz H, Cammisa FP, Albert TJ, Emery SE, Lenke LG, Abdu WA, Longley M, Errico TJ, Hu SS (2007) Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 356(22):2257–2270PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mirza SK, Deyo RA (2007) Systematic review of randomized trials comparing lumbar fusion surgery to non-operative care for treatment of chronic back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(7):816–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sinikallio S, Aalto T, Airaksinen O, Lehto SM, Kröger H, Viinamäki H (2011) Depression is associated with a poorer outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: a two-year prospective follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(8):677–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    LaCaille RA, DeBerard MS, Masters KS, Colledge AL, Bacon W (2005) Presurgical biopsychosocial factors predict multidimensional patient: outcomes of interbody cage lumbar fusion. Spine J 5(1):71–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Katz JN, Stucki G, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Grobler LJ, Weinstein JN (1999) Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(21):2229–2233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poutanen O, Koivisto AM, Salokangas RK (2008) The Depression Scale (DEPS) as a case finder for depression in various subgroups of primary care patients. Eur Psychiatry 23(8):580–586 Epub Sep 7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Salokangas RK, Poutanen O, Stengård E (1995) Screening for depression in primary care. Development and validation of the Depression Scale, a screening instrument for depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand 92(1):10–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Poutanen O, Koivisto AM, Kääriä S, Salokangas RK (2010) The validity of the Depression Scale (DEPS) to assess the severity of depression in primary care patients. Fam Pract 27(5):527–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pekkanen L, Kautiainen H, Ylinen J, Salo P, Häkkinen A (2011) Reliability and validity study of the Finnish version 2.0 of the Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(4):332–338Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(22):2940–2952 (discussion 2952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B (1983) The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 17(1):45–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Trief PM, Ploutz-Snyder R, Fredrickson BE (2006) Emotional health predicts pain and function after fusion: a prospective multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(7):823–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Okoro T, Sell P (2009) The prediction of outcome in somatised patients undergoing elective lumbar surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(4):517–521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Djurasovic M, Dimar JR, Johnson JR, Puno RM, Campbell MJ (2009) Are preoperative health-related quality of life scores predictive of clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(7):725–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ayuso-Mateos JL, Vázquez-Barquero JL, Dowrick C, Lehtinen V, Dalgard OS, Casey P, Wilkinson C, Lasa L, Page H, Dunn G, Wilkinson G, ODIN Group (2001) Depressive disorders in Europe: prevalence figures from the ODIN study. Br J Psychiatry 179:308–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vanhala M, Jokelainen J, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S, Kumpusalo E, Koponen H (2009) Depressive symptoms predispose females to metabolic syndrome: a 7-year follow-up study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 119(2):137–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Salokangas RK, Vaahtera K, Pacriev S, Sohlman B, Lehtinen V (2002) Gender differences in depressive symptoms. An artefact caused by measurement instruments? J Affect Disord 68(2–3):215–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Enthoven P, Skargren E, Carstensen J, Oberg B (2006) Predictive factors for 1-year and 5-year outcome for disability in a working population of patients with low back pain treated in primary care. Pain 122(1–2):137–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Andersen T, Videbaek TS, Hansen ES, Bünger C, Christensen FB (2008) The positive effect of posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion is preserved at long-term follow-up: a RCT with 11–13 year follow-up. Eur Spine J 17(2):272–280PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hägg O, Fritzel P, Nordwall A (2003) The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 12(1):12–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY (2008) Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. Spine J 8(6):968–974PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hägg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A, The Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group (2002) Characteristics of patients with chronic low back pain selected for surgery: a comparison with the general population reported from the Swedish lumbar spine study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(11):1223–1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marko Wahlman
    • 1
  • Arja Häkkinen
    • 2
    • 3
  • Joost Dekker
    • 4
  • Ilkka Marttinen
    • 1
  • Kimmo Vihtonen
    • 1
  • Marko H. Neva
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryTampere University HospitalTampereFinland
  2. 2.Department of Health SciencesUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland
  3. 3.Department of Physical MedicineJyväskylä Central HospitalJyväskyläFinland
  4. 4.Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Department of PsychiatryVY University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations