Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 22, Issue 9, pp 2089–2096 | Cite as

A comprehensive multimodal pain treatment reduces opioid consumption after multilevel spine surgery

  • Ole MathiesenEmail author
  • Benny Dahl
  • Berit A. Thomsen
  • Birgitte Kitter
  • Nan Sonne
  • Jørgen B. Dahl
  • Henrik Kehlet
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Major spine surgery with multilevel instrumentation is followed by large amount of opioid consumption, significant pain and difficult mobilization in a population of predominantly chronic pain patients. This case–control study investigated if a standardized comprehensive pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) treatment protocol would improve pain treatment in this population.

Methods

A new regimen with acetaminophen, NSAIDs, gabapentin, S-ketamine, dexamethasone, ondansetron and epidural local anesthetic infusion or patient controlled analgesia with morphine, was introduced in a post-intervention group of 41 consecutive patients undergoing multilevel (median 10) instrumented spinal fusions and compared with 44 patients in a pre-intervention group.

Results

Compared to patients in the pre-intervention group, patients treated according to the new protocol consumed less opioid on postoperative day (POD) 1 (P = 0.024) and 2 (P = 0.048), they were mobilized earlier from bed (P = 0.003) and ambulation was earlier both with and without a walking frame (P = 0.027 and P = 0.027, respectively). Finally, patients following the new protocol experienced low intensities of nausea, sedation and dizziness on POD 1–6.

Conclusions

In this study of patients scheduled for multilevel spine surgery, it was demonstrated that compared to a historic group of patients receiving usual care, a comprehensive and standardized multimodal pain and PONV protocol significantly reduced opioid consumption, improved postoperative mobilization and presented concomitant low levels of nausea, sedation and dizziness.

Keywords

Major spine surgery Multimodal pain treatment Opioid consumption Mobilization 

Notes

Conflict of interest

Benny Dahl is funded by a grant from the Danish Strategic Research Council (#2142-08-0017). No other funding was received for the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Pumberger M, Chiu YL, Ma Y et al (2012) National in-hospital morbidity and mortality trends after lumbar fusion surgery between 1998 and 2008. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:359–364PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rajaee SS, Bae HW, Kanim LE et al (2012) Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buvanendran A, Thillainathan V (2010) Preoperative and postoperative anesthetic and analgesic techniques for minimally invasive surgery of the spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:S274–S280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gottschalk A, Freitag M, Tank S et al (2004) Quality of postoperative pain using an intraoperatively placed epidural catheter after major lumbar spinal surgery. Anesthesiology 101:175–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gottschalk A, Durieux ME, Nemergut EC (2011) Intraoperative methadone improves postoperative pain control in patients undergoing complex spine surgery. Anesth Analg 112:218–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Loftus RW, Yeager MP, Clark JA et al (2010) Intraoperative ketamine reduces perioperative opiate consumption in opiate-dependent patients with chronic back pain undergoing back surgery. Anesthesiology 113:639–646PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kehlet H, Dahl JB (1993) The value of “multimodal” or “balanced analgesia” in postoperative pain treatment. Anesth Analg 77:1048–1056PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    White PF, Kehlet H (2010) Improving postoperative pain management: what are the unresolved issues? Anesthesiology 112:220–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kehlet H (2005) Postoperative opioid sparing to hasten recovery: what are the issues? Anesthesiology 102:1083–1085PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim JC, Choi YS, Kim KN et al (2011) Effective dose of peri-operative oral pregabalin as an adjunct to multimodal analgesic regimen in lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:428–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ziegeler S, Fritsch E, Bauer C et al (2008) Therapeutic effect of intrathecal morphine after posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2379–2386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nielsen PR, Jorgensen LD, Dahl B et al (2010) Prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after spinal surgery: randomized clinical trial. Clin Rehabil 24:137–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Julious SA, George S, Campbell MJ (1995) Sample sizes for studies using the short form 36 (SF-36). J Epidemiol Community Health 49:642–644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI et al (2010) Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA 303:1259–1265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD et al (2005) A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:1565–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM et al (2007) Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:1155–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Husted H, Holm G, Jacobsen S (2008) Predictors of length of stay and patient satisfaction after hip and knee replacement surgery: fast-track experience in 712 patients. Acta Orthop 79:168–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rasmussen S, Krum-Moller DS, Lauridsen LR et al (2008) Epidural steroid following discectomy for herniated lumbar disc reduces neurological impairment and enhances recovery: a randomized study with two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2028–2033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jirarattanaphochai K, Jung S, Thienthong S et al (2007) Peridural methylprednisolone and wound infiltration with bupivacaine for postoperative pain control after posterior lumbar spine surgery: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:609–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    De Oliveira GSJ, Almeida MD, Benzon HT et al (2011) Perioperative single dose systemic dexamethasone for postoperative pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology 115:575–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lunn TH, Kristensen BB, Andersen LO et al (2011) Effect of high-dose preoperative methylprednisolone on pain and recovery after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 106:230–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dahners LE, Mullis BH (2004) Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on bone formation and soft-tissue healing. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:139–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sucato DJ, Lovejoy JF, Agrawal S et al (2008) Postoperative ketorolac does not predispose to pseudoarthrosis following posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1119–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dodwell ER, Latorre JG, Parisini E et al (2010) NSAID exposure and risk of nonunion: a meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies. Calcif Tissue Int 87:193–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maund E, McDaid C, Rice S, Wright K, Jenkins B, Woolacott N (2011) Paracetamol and selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the reduction in morphine related side-effects after major surgery: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth 106:292–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ole Mathiesen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Benny Dahl
    • 2
  • Berit A. Thomsen
    • 1
  • Birgitte Kitter
    • 1
  • Nan Sonne
    • 1
  • Jørgen B. Dahl
    • 3
  • Henrik Kehlet
    • 4
  1. 1.Section of Acute Pain Management and Palliative Medicine, Department of Anesthesia 4231Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalCopenhagen ØDenmark
  2. 2.Spine Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery 3191Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
  3. 3.Department of Anesthesia 4231Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
  4. 4.Section for Surgical PathophysiologyRigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations