Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 1339–1345 | Cite as

The lumbar lordosis index: a new ratio to detect spinal malalignment with a therapeutic impact for sagittal balance correction decisions in adult scoliosis surgery

  • Louis BoissièreEmail author
  • Anouar Bourghli
  • Jean-Marc Vital
  • Olivier Gille
  • Ibrahim Obeid
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Sagittal malalignment is frequently observed in adult scoliosis. C7 plumb line, lumbar lordosis and pelvic tilt are the main factors to evaluate sagittal balance and the need of a vertebral osteotomy to correct it. We described a ratio: the lumbar lordosis index (ratio lumbar lordosis/pelvic incidence) (LLI) and analyzed its relationships with spinal malalignment and vertebral osteotomies.

Methods

53 consecutive patients with a surgical adult scoliosis had preoperative and postoperative full spine EOS radiographies to measure spino-pelvic parameters and LLI. The lack of lordosis was calculated after prediction of theoretical lumbar lordosis. Correlation analysis between the different parameters was performed.

Results

All parameters were correlated with spinal malalignment but LLI is the most correlated parameter (r = −0.978). It is also the best parameter in this study to predict the need of a spinal osteotomy (r = 1 if LLI <0.5).

Conclusion

LLI is a statistically validated parameter for sagittal malalignment analysis. It can be used as a mathematical tool to detect spinal malalignment in adult scoliosis and guides the surgeon decision of realizing a vertebral osteotomy for adult scoliosis sagittal correction. It can be used as well for the interpretation of clinical series in adult scoliosis.

Keywords

Adult scoliosis Pelvic incidence Lumbar lordosis Fixed sagittal malalignment Lumbar lordosis index 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, McEnery KW (1995) An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine 20:1351–1358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schwab FJ, Smith VA, Biserni M, Gamez L, Farcy JP, Pagala M (2002) Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis. Spine 27:387–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ploumis A, Liu H, Mehbod AA, Transfeldt EE, Winter RB (2009) A correlation of radiographic and functional measurements in adult degenerative scoliosis. Spine 34:1581–1584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Joseph SA Jr, Moreno AP, Brandoff J, Casden AC, Kuflik P, Neuwirth MG (2009) Sagittal plane deformity in the adult patient. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17:378–388PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang BP, Ondra SL, Chen LA, Jung HS, Koski TR, Salehi SA (2006) Clinical and radiographic outcomes of thoracic and lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance. J Neurosurg Spine 5:9–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lafage V, Schwab F, Skalli W, Hawkinson N, Gagey PM, Ondra S et al (2008) Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters. Spine 33:1572–1578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rose PS, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cronen GA, Mulconrey DS, Buchowski JM et al (2009) Role of pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, and patient factors on sagittal plane correction following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Spine 34:785–791PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, Farcy JP (2009) Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine 34:1828–1833PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bridwell KH (2006) Causes of sagittal spinal imbalance and assessment of the extent of needed correction. Instr Course Lect 55:567–575PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cho KJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Berra A, Baldus C (2005) Comparison of Smith-Petersen versus pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of fixed sagittal imbalance. Spine 30:2030–2037PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aurouer N, Obeid I, Gille O, Pointillart V, Vital JM (2009) Computerized preoperative planning for correction of sagittal deformity of the spine. Surg Radiol Anat 31(10):781–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Le Huec JC, Leijssen P, Duarte M, Aunoble S (2011) Thoracolumbar imbalance analysis for osteotomy planification using a new method: FBI technique. Eur Spine J 20(S5):669–680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schwab F, Lafage V, Farcy JP, Bridwell K, Glassman S, Ondra S et al (2007) Surgical rates and operative outcome analysis in thoracolumbar and lumbar major adult scoliosis: application of the new adult deformity classification. Spine 32:2723–2730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Duval-Beaupere G (2004) Composante sagittale de la statque rachidienne. Revue de Rhumatologie 71:115–119Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mangione P, Gomez D, Senegas J (1997) Study of the course of the incidence angle during growth. Eur Spine J 6:163–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marty C, Boisaubert B, Descamps H, Montigny JP, Hecquet J, Legaye J et al (2002) The sagittal anatomy of the sacrum among young adults, infants, and spondylolisthesis patients. Eur Spine J 11:119–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mouilleseaux B, Marty C et al (2006) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 15:415–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G (2005) Sagittal plane alignment of the spine and gravity: a radiological and clinical evaluation. Acta Orthop Belg 71:213–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Obeid I, Hauger O, Aunoble S, Bourghli A, Pellet N, Vital JM (2011) Global analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in major deformities: correlation between lack of lumbar lordosis and flexion of the knee. Eur Spine J 20(S5):681–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dubousset J, Charpak G, Skalli W, Kalifa G, Lazennec JY (2007) EOS stereo-radiography system: whole-body simultaneous anteroposterior and lateral radiographs with very low radiation dose. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 93:141–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Baldus CR, Blanke KM (1999) Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance). Spine 24:1712–1720PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aebi M (2005) The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 14:925–948PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schwab F, Farcy JP, Bridwell K, Berven S, Glassman S, Harrast J et al (2006) A clinical impact classification of scoliosis in the adult. Spine 31:2109–2114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jackson RP, Simmons EH, Stripinis D (1983) Incidence and severity of back pain in adult idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 8:749–756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barrey C, Roussouly P, Perrin G, Le Huec JC (2011) Sagittal balance disorders in severe degenerative spine. Can we identify the compensatory mechanisms? Eur Spine J 20(S5):626–633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louis Boissière
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anouar Bourghli
    • 1
  • Jean-Marc Vital
    • 1
  • Olivier Gille
    • 1
  • Ibrahim Obeid
    • 1
  1. 1.Unité chirurgie rachis1Université Bordeaux CHUBordeauxFrance

Personalised recommendations