Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 1037–1044 | Cite as

Irrigation endoscopic discectomy: a novel percutaneous approach for lumbar disc prolapse

  • Hesham Magdi SolimanEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to present a new endoscopic procedure, aiming to achieve the success rate equivalent to microsurgical discectomy, while addressing the drawbacks and limitations of other percutaneous techniques.

Methods

A series of 43 patients with uncontained lumbar disc herniation underwent surgery with irrigation endoscopic discectomy (IED). The endoscope and instruments are placed directly over the surface of the lamina through two posterior skin portals 5 mm each without any muscle retraction or dilatation. Pump irrigation is used for the opening of a potential working space. The rest of the procedure is performed endoscopically like the standard microsurgical discectomy.

Results

Outcome according to modified Macnab criteria was excellent in 78 %, good in 17 %, and poor in 5 % of patients. VAS for leg pain dropped from 78 preoperatively to 7, and the Oswestry Low-Back Pain Disability Questionnaire dropped from 76 to 19. The mean time for postoperative ambulation was 4 h, hospital stay was 8 h, and for return to work was 7 days.

Conclusions

Preliminary clinical experience with IED shows it to be as effective as microsurgical discectomy, and in comparison to other percutaneous procedures addressing noncontained herniations, a reduction in the cost, technical difficulty and surgical invasiveness has been demonstrated.

Keywords

Irrigation endoscopic discectomy Endoscopic discectomy Minimally invasive spine surgery Lumbar discectomy Percutaneous discectomy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

There was no external funding for this study.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Perez-Cruet MJ, Fessler RG, Perin NI (2002) Review: complications of minimally invasive spinal surgery. Neurosurgery 51(Suppl 5):S26–S36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith L (1964) Enzyme dissolution of the nucleus pulposus in humans. JAMA 265:137–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hijikata S, Yamgishi M, Nakayama T, Oomon K (1975) Percutaneous discectomy: a new treatment method for lumbar disc herniation. J Toden Hosp 5:5–13Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Onik G, Helms CA, Ginsberg L (1985) Percutaneous lumbar discectomy using a new aspiration probe. AJR Am J Roentgenol 144:1137–1140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schreiber A, Suezawa Y (1986) Transdiscoscopic percutaneous nucleotomy in disc herniation. Orthop Rev 15:35–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Choy DSJ, Case RB, Fielding W (1987) Percutaneous laser nucleolysis of lumbar discs. N Engl J Med 317:771–772PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mathews HH (1996) Transforaminal endoscopic microdiscectomy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 7:59–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lew SM, Mehalic TF, Fagone KL (2001) Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of far-lateral and foraminal lumbar disc herniations. J Neurosurg 94:216–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kahanovitz N, Viola K, Goldstein T, Dawson EA (1990) Multicenter analysis of percutaneous discectomy. Spine 15:713–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Perez-Cruet MJ, Foley KT, Isaacs RE et al (2002) Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy: technical note. Neurosurgery 51(Suppl 2):S129–S136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Foley KT, Smith MM (1997) Microendoscopic discectomy. Tech Neurosurg 3:301–307Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brayda-Bruno M, Cinnella P (2000) Posterior endoscopic discectomy (and other procedures). Eur Spine J Suppl 7:S024–S029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Constantin S, Elefterios T, Joyti S (2005) Microendoscopic discectomy compared with standard microsurgical discectomy for treatment of uncontained or large contained disc herniations. Neurosurgery 57(4):357–360Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Orlando R, Asdrubal F, Osmar A (2007) Comparison of open discectomy with microendoscopic discectomy in lumbar disc herniations: results of a randomized controlled trial. Neurosurgery 61(3):545–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xiaotao W, Suyang Z, Zubin M, Hui C (2006) Microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: surgical technique and outcome in 873 consecutive cases. Spine 31(23):2689–2694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schick U, Döhnert J, Richter A et al (2002) Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open surgery: an intraoperative EMG study. Eur Spine J 11(1):20–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jen Huang T, Wei Hsu R, Yao Li Y et al (2005) Less systemic cytokine response in patients following microendoscopic versus open lumbar discectomy. J Orthop Res 23(2):406–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nakagawa H, Kamimura M, Uchiyama S et al (2003) Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for lumbar disc prolapsed. J Clin Neurosci 10(2):231–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Adrian N (2005) Assessment of the learning curve for lumbar microendoscopic discectomy. Neurosurgery 56(4):755–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maroon JC (2002) Current concepts in minimally invasive discectomy. Neurosurgery 51(Suppl 5):S137–S145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Daltroy LH, Cats-Baril WL, Katz JN et al (1996) The North American spine society (NASS) lumbar spine outcome instrument: reliability and validity tests. Spine 21:741–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fairbank J, Pynsent P (2000) The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 25:2940–2953PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Macnab I (1971) Negative disc exploration. an analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients. J Bone Jt Surg Am 53:891–903Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of MedicineCairo UniversityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations