Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 345–354 | Cite as

Posterior correction of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with pedicle screw instrumentation: results of 48 patients with minimal 10-year follow-up

  • Kan MinEmail author
  • Christoph Sdzuy
  • Mazda Farshad
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Since early 1990s pedicle screws in thoracic spine have been used in posterior correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Long-term results are scarce. We report clinical, radiological and pulmonary function results of 48 consecutive patients with 10-year minimal follow-up.

Methods

Forty-eight consecutive patients (42 females, 6 males) with 41 Lenke 1 (lumbar modifier A = 19, B = 8, C = 14), 7 Lenke 2 (lumbar modifier A = 2, B = 4, C = 1) were operated for AIS from posterior with pedicle screw alone instrumentation. Risser stage at the time of operation was 0–3 in 24, more than 3 in 24 patients. Mean age was 15.3 years. The data were prospectively collected preoperatively, at 6 weeks, 2 years and 10 years postoperatively. Cobb angle, sagittal and coronal balance, distal adjacent disc angle and lowest fused vertebral tilt were documented at all time-points. Choice of fusion levels is described. Not every vertebra was instrumented with pedicle screws. The implant density was average one pedicle screw per vertebra or 50 %. Derotation and translation of apical vertebrae on the concave side were performed for correction. The overall outcome and the outcome of different curve types were analyzed statistically.

Results

Lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) was distal end vertebra in two-thirds of the patients and was one below distal end vertebra in one-third of the patients. The main thoracic curve correction was 63 %, from 58° ± 12° preoperative to 21° ± 9° at 6 weeks. The Cobb angle was 23° ± 10° at 2 years and 26° ± 10° at 10 years. The apical vertebral rotation improved 35 %, the non-instrumented lumbar curves improved 47 %, the distal adjacent disc angle decreased from 6° ± 3° preoperatively to −2° ± 4° postoperatively and the last instrumented vertebral tilt decreased from 23° ± 8° preoperatively to 5° ± 5° postoperatively. All these parameters remained stable up to 10-year follow-up. The scoliosis correction was not associated with any change in the preoperative thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis. The  % FVC remained unchanged with 74 ± 21 % preoperatively to 74 ± 11 % at 2 years and 75 ± 10 % at 10 years. The SRS-24 score was 93 ± 18 points at 2 years and 95 ± 22 points at 10 years. There were no neurological complications, no pedicle screw-related complications.

Conclusion

Posterior correction of thoracic AIS with pedicle screw instrumentation is safe and produces a long-term stable correction and high patient satisfaction. An implant density of 50 % is sufficient to achieve these results. LIV can be the distal end vertebra or one below the distal end vertebra depending on the position of the distal end vertebra to the centre sacral line. The preoperative pulmonary function does not change on long term.

Keywords

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Selective posterior correction with pedicle screw instrumentation Choice of fusion levels Long-term operative results Long-term pulmonary function 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Kepler CK, Meredith DS, Green DW, Widmann RF (2012) Long-term outcomes after posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Curr Opin Pediatr 24:68–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Papin P, Labelle H, Delorme S, Aubin CE, de Guise JA, Dansereau J (1999) Long-term three-dimensional changes of the spine after posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 8:16–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK, Bridwell KH, Sides B, Blanke K (2004) Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:2040–2048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harrington PR (1962) Treatment of scoliosis. Correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 44-A:591–610PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cotrel Y, Dubousset J (1984) A new technic for segmental spinal osteosynthesis using the posterior approach. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 70:489–494PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Min K, Waelchli B, Hahn F (2005) Primary thoracoplasty and pedicle screw instrumentation in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 14:777–782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Suk SI, Lee SM, Chung ER, Kim JH, Kim SS (2005) Selective thoracic fusion with segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: more than 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:1602–1609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lehman RA Jr, Lenke LG, Keeler KA, Kim YJ, Buchowski JM, Cheh G, Kuhns CA, Bridwell KH (2008) Operative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with posterior pedicle screw-only constructs: minimum three-year follow-up of one hundred fourteen cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1598–1604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, Blanke K (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1169–1181PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS, Winter RB (1983) The selection fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:1302–1313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Risser JC (1958) The Iliac apophysis: an invaluable sign in the management of scoliosis. Clin Orthop 11:111–119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hahn F, Zbinden R, Min K (2005) Late implant infections caused by Propionibacterium acnes in scoliosis surgery. Eur Spine J 14:783–788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Farshad M, Sdzuy C, Min K (2012) Late implant removal after posterior correction of thoracic AIS with pedicle screw instrumentation—A matched case control study with 10 year follow-up. Presented in SRS 47th annual meeting, Chicago, IL, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Baldus C, Blanke K (1992) Preventing decompensation in King type II curves treated with Cotrel–Dubousset instrumentation. Strict guidelines for selective thoracic fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:S274–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Erickson MA, Baulesh DM (2011) Lowest instrumented vertebra selection in AIS. J Pediatr Orthop 31:S69–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Kim J, Cho SK (2005) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2045–2050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pehrsson K, Danielsson A, Nachemson A (2001) Pulmonary function in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 25 year follow up after surgery or start of brace treatment. Thorax 56:388–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kearon C, Viviani GR, Kirkley A, Killian KJ (1993) Factors determining pulmonary function in adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 148:288–294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Di Silvestre M, Bakaloudis G, Lolli F, Giacomini S (2011) Late-developing infection following posterior fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 1):S121–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Deptarment of Orthopaedics, Balgrist ClinicUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations