Electromyographic analysis of trunk-muscle activity during stable, unstable and unilateral bridging exercises in healthy individuals
- 566 Downloads
Spinal pain can result in unilateral atrophy of spinal muscles. Understanding side-to-side muscle activity during exercises can help clinicians address these deficits. This study determined if variations of bridging exercises specifically activated side-to-side trunk-muscle activity.
Using surface electromyography on 20 healthy subjects (16 females), age 25.45 (±3.57) years, height 166 (±0.8) cm, weight 63.35 (±12.70) kg, muscle activity of left and right lumbar multifidus, iliocostalis lumborum thoracis (ICLT), rectus abdominis (RA) and external oblique (EO) was recorded during eight bridging exercises with stable, unstable and unilateral (left-leg off the ground) conditions.
There were significant side-to-side differences in abdominal-muscle activity during all unstable exercises (mean difference range from 3.10 %MVC for RA to 9.86 %MVC for EO), and during all unilateral exercises (mean difference range from 3.22 %MVC for RA to 9.41 %MVC for EO), with the exception of RA in exercise-7. For the back muscles, there were significant side-to-side differences for multifidus during all unilateral exercises (mean difference range 5.35 %MVC to 11.72 %MVC), with the exception of exercise-5. None of the bilateral exercises (stable or unstable) produced side-to-side differences for multifidus. For ICLT only exercise-3 produced significant side-to-side differences with a mean difference of 5.5 %MVC. In all cases where significant differences were noted, the left side of the muscles demonstrated the higher values.
The results suggest that specific exercises (unilateral/unstable) can target specific sides of trunk muscles.
KeywordsElectromyography Exercises Unilateral Unstable Trunk muscles
Conflict of interest
- 4.Hides JA, Stanton W, McMahon S, Sims K, Richardson CA (2009) Effect of stabilization training on multifidus muscle cross-sectional area among young elite cricketers with low back pain. J Ortho and Phys Ther 38(3):101–108Google Scholar
- 5.Manniche C, Hesselsøe G, Bentzen L, Christensen I, Lundberg E (1998) Clinical trial of intensive muscle training for chronic low back pain. Lancet 2:1473–1476Google Scholar
- 11.Ekstrom RA, Donatelli RA, Carp KC (2007) Electromyographic analysis of core, trunk, hip and thigh muscles during 9 rehabilitation exercises. J Ortho and Sports Phys Ther 37(12):754–765Google Scholar
- 13.Escamilla RF, Lewis C, Bell D, Bramble G, Daffron J, Lambert S, Pecson A, Imamura R, Paulos L, Andrews JR (2010) Core muscle activation during swiss ball and traditional abdominal exercises. J Ortho Sports Phys Ther 40(5):265–276Google Scholar
- 15.Danneels LA, Vanderstraeten DC, Cambier EE, Witvrouw J, Bourgois W, Dankaerts W, De Cuyper HJ (2001) Effects of three different training modalities on the cross sectional area of the lumbar multifidus muscle in patients with chronic low back pain. Br J Sports Med 35:186–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Ekstrom RA, Osborn RW, Hauer PL (2008) Surface electromyography analysis of the low back muscles during rehabilitation exercises. J Ortho Sports Phys Ther 38(12):736–748Google Scholar
- 19.Yucha C, Gilbert C (2004) Evidence based practice in biofeedback and neurofeedback. Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, Wheat Ridge, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
- 20.Wolf SL, Braus VG, Montani M (1997) Electrokinesiologic measurement of trunk sagittal mobility and lumbar erector spinae muscle activity. J Rehab Res Dev 34(4):470–479Google Scholar