Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain and its relationship with relaxin levels during pregnancy: a systematic review
- First Online:
- 1.1k Downloads
The present systematic review assessed the level of evidence for the association between relaxin levels and pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPGP) during pregnancy.
PRISMA guidelines were followed to conduct this systematic review. Electronic search was carried out using six different databases. Observational cohorts, cross-sectional or case–control studies focused on the association between relaxin levels and PPGP during pregnancy were included. Studies selection was conducted by two reviewers who screened firstly for titles, then for abstracts and finally for full articles. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale and the quality of evidence by the guidelines proposed by the Cochrane back review group.
731 references were identified. Six articles met the inclusion criteria and were considered for this systematic review. The main reason for the studies exclusion was PPGP related to gynaecological reasons. Five studies were case–control and one study was a prospective cohort. Four studies were ranked as high while two were ranked as low quality. Among the high quality studies, three found no association between PPGP and relaxin levels.
Based on these findings, the level of evidence for the association between PPGP and relaxin levels was found to be low. PPGP assessment and controlling for risk factors were found to increase bias leaving uncertainty in interpretation of these findings and a need for further research.
KeywordsPregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain Relaxin Low back pain Pregnancy Systematic review
- 17.Heckman JD, Sassard R (1994) Musculoskeletal considerations in pregnancy. J Bone Jt Surg Ser A 76(11):1720–1731Google Scholar
- 19.Hisaw FL (1926) Experimental relaxation of the pubic ligament of the guinea pig. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 23(23):661–663Google Scholar
- 25.Borg-Stein J, Dugan SA (2007) Musculoskeletal disorders of pregnancy, delivery and postpartum. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 18(3):459–476, ixGoogle Scholar
- 26.MacLennan AH, MacLennan SC (1997) Symptom-giving pelvic girdle relaxation of pregnancy, postnatal pelvic joint syndrome and developmental dysplasia of the hip. The Norwegian Association for Women with Pelvic Girdle Relaxation (Landforeningen for Kvinner Med Bekkenlosningsplager). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76(8):760–764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Moher D et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4): 264–269, W64Google Scholar
- 30.Furlan AD et al (2009) 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(18):1929–1941Google Scholar
- 31.Wells G et al (2011) The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Insitute. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm. Accessed 15 Jul 2011
- 38.Bjelland EK et al (2010) Pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy: the impact of parity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(2):146 e1–e6Google Scholar
- 40.Knobil E, Neill JD (2006) The physiology of reproduction, vol 1, 3rd edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- 54.Biering K et al (2011) Pregnancy-related pelvic pain is more frequent in women with increased body mass index. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90(10):1132–1139Google Scholar