European Spine Journal

, Volume 21, Issue 9, pp 1769–1776

Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain and its relationship with relaxin levels during pregnancy: a systematic review

  • Daniela Aldabe
  • Daniel Cury Ribeiro
  • Stephan Milosavljevic
  • Melanie Dawn Bussey
Review Article

Abstract

Purpose

The present systematic review assessed the level of evidence for the association between relaxin levels and pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPGP) during pregnancy.

Methods

PRISMA guidelines were followed to conduct this systematic review. Electronic search was carried out using six different databases. Observational cohorts, cross-sectional or case–control studies focused on the association between relaxin levels and PPGP during pregnancy were included. Studies selection was conducted by two reviewers who screened firstly for titles, then for abstracts and finally for full articles. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale and the quality of evidence by the guidelines proposed by the Cochrane back review group.

Results

731 references were identified. Six articles met the inclusion criteria and were considered for this systematic review. The main reason for the studies exclusion was PPGP related to gynaecological reasons. Five studies were case–control and one study was a prospective cohort. Four studies were ranked as high while two were ranked as low quality. Among the high quality studies, three found no association between PPGP and relaxin levels.

Conclusions

Based on these findings, the level of evidence for the association between PPGP and relaxin levels was found to be low. PPGP assessment and controlling for risk factors were found to increase bias leaving uncertainty in interpretation of these findings and a need for further research.

Keywords

Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain Relaxin Low back pain Pregnancy Systematic review 

References

  1. 1.
    Vleeming A et al (2008) European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J 17(6):794PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rost CC et al (2004) Pelvic pain during pregnancy: a descriptive study of signs and symptoms of 870 patients in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(22):2567–2572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gutke A, Josefsson A, Oberg B (2007) Pelvic girdle pain and lumbar pain in relation to postpartum depressive symptoms. Spine Phila Pa (1976) 32(13):1430–1436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mens JM et al (1999) The active straight leg raising test and mobility of the pelvic joints. Eur Spine J 8(6):468–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mens JMA, Pool-Goudzwaard A, Stam HJ (2009) Mobility of the pelvic joints in pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 64(3):200–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ritchie JR (2003) Orthopedic considerations during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 46(2):456–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Snijders CJ, Vleeming A, Stoeckart R (1993) Transfer of lumbosacral load to iliac bones and legs: Part 1: biomechanics of self-bracing of the sacroiliac joints and its significance for treatment and exercise. Clin Biomech 8(6):285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Snijders C, Vleeming A, Stoeckart R (1993) Transfer of lumbosacral load to iliac bones and legs: part 2: loading of the sacroiliac joints when lifting in a stooped posture. Clin Biomech 8(6):295–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pool-Goudzwaard A et al (2001) The sacroiliac part of the iliolumbar ligament. J Anat 199(04):457–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vleeming A, Stoeckart R, Snijders C (1989) The sacrotuberous ligament: a conceptual approach to its dynamic role in stabilizing the sacroiliac joint. Clin Biomech 4(4):201–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vleeming A et al (1996) The function of the long dorsal sacroiliac ligament: its implication for understanding low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21(5):556–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pool-Goudzwaard A et al (2003) The iliolumbar ligament: its influence on stability of the sacroiliac joint. Clin Biomech 18(2):99–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Varga E, Dudas B, Tile M (2008) Putative proprioceptive function of the pelvic ligaments: biomechanical and histological studies. Injury 39(8):858–864PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nilsson-Wikmar L et al (2005) Effect of three different physical therapy treatments on pain and activity in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain: a randomized clinical trial with 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up postpartum. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(8):850–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mens JM et al (2006) The mechanical effect of a pelvic belt in patients with pregnancy-related pelvic pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 21(2):122–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ho SS et al (2009) Effectiveness of maternity support belts in reducing low back pain during pregnancy: a review. J Clin Nurs 18(11):1523–1532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heckman JD, Sassard R (1994) Musculoskeletal considerations in pregnancy. J Bone Jt Surg Ser A 76(11):1720–1731Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Petersen LK et al (1995) Variations in serum relaxin (hRLX-2) concentrations during human pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 74(4):251–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hisaw FL (1926) Experimental relaxation of the pubic ligament of the guinea pig. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 23(23):661–663Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Samuel CS et al (1996) The effect of relaxin on collagen metabolism in the nonpregnant rat pubic symphysis: the influence of estrogen and progesterone in regulating relaxin activity. Endocrinology 137(9):3884–3890PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Unemori EN, Amento EP (1990) Relaxin modulates synthesis and secretion of procollagenase and collagen by human dermal fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 265(18):10681–10685PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bell R et al (1987) Relaxin in human pregnancy serum measured with an homologous radioimmunoassay. Obstet Gynecol 69(4):585PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Owens K, Pearson A, Mason G (2002) Pubic symphysis separation. Fetal Matern Med Rev 13(2):141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schauberger CW et al (1996) Peripheral joint laxity increases in pregnancy but does not correlate with serum relaxin levels. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174(2):667–671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Borg-Stein J, Dugan SA (2007) Musculoskeletal disorders of pregnancy, delivery and postpartum. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 18(3):459–476, ixGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    MacLennan AH, MacLennan SC (1997) Symptom-giving pelvic girdle relaxation of pregnancy, postnatal pelvic joint syndrome and developmental dysplasia of the hip. The Norwegian Association for Women with Pelvic Girdle Relaxation (Landforeningen for Kvinner Med Bekkenlosningsplager). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76(8):760–764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    van Dongen PWJ et al (1999) Hypermobility and peripartum pelvic pain syndrome in pregnant South African women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 84(1):77–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Moher D et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4): 264–269, W64Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Berlin JA (1997) Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? University of Pennsylvania Meta-analysis Blinding Study Group. Lancet 350(9072):185–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Furlan AD et al (2009) 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(18):1929–1941Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wells G et al (2011) The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Insitute. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm. Accessed 15 Jul 2011
  32. 32.
    Wai EK et al (2010) Causal assessment of occupational bending or twisting and low back pain: results of a systematic review. Spine J 10(1):76–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Roffey DM et al (2010) Causal assessment of awkward occupational postures and low back pain: results of a systematic review. Spine J 10(1):89–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wu WH et al (2004) Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence. Eur Spine J 13(7):575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Albert HB et al (2006) Risk factors in developing pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85(5):539–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Biering K et al (2010) Smoking and pregnancy-related pelvic pain. BJOG 117(8):1019–1026PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Robinson HS et al (2010) Pelvic girdle pain—associations between risk factors in early pregnancy and disability or pain intensity in late pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bjelland EK et al (2010) Pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy: the impact of parity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(2):146 e1–e6Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Björklund K et al (2000) Symphyseal distention in relation to serum relaxin levels and pelvic pain in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79(4):269–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Knobil E, Neill JD (2006) The physiology of reproduction, vol 1, 3rd edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kristiansson P, Svardsudd K, vonSchoultz B (1996) Serum relaxin, symphyseal pain, and back pain during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(5):1342–1347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kristiansson P, Svärdsudd K, von Schoultz B (1999) Reproductive hormones and aminoterminal propeptide of type III procollagen in serum as early markers of pelvic pain during late pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(1):128–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    MacLennan AH et al (1986) Serum relaxin and pelvic pain of pregnancy. Lancet 2(8501):243–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hansen A et al (1996) Relaxin is not related to symptom-giving pelvic girdle relaxation in pregnant women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 75(3):245–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Albert H et al (1997) Circulating levels of relaxin are normal in pregnant women with pelvic pain. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 74(1):19–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Petersen LK, Hvidman L, Uldbjerg N (1994) Normal serum relaxin in women with disabling pelvic pain during pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 38(1):21–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Albert H, Godskesen M, Westergaard J (2000) Evaluation of clinical tests used in classification procedures in pregnancy-related pelvic joint pain. Eur Spine J 9(2):161–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gutke A, Kjellby-Wendt G, Oberg B (2010) The inter-rater reliability of a standardised classification system for pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain. Man Ther 15(1):13–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mens JM et al (2001) Reliability and validity of the active straight leg raise test in posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(10):1167–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Robinson HS et al (2010) Pelvic girdle pain, clinical tests and disability in late pregnancy. Man Ther 15(3):280–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Artal R, Toole MO, White S (2003) Guidelines of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists for exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period/commentary. Br J Sports Med 37(1):6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Vermani E, Mittal R, Weeks A (2010) Pelvic girdle pain and low back pain in pregnancy: a review. Pain Pract 10(1):60–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bastiaanssen JM et al (2005) A historical perspective on pregnancy-related low back and/or pelvic girdle pain. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 120(1):3–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Biering K et al (2011) Pregnancy-related pelvic pain is more frequent in women with increased body mass index. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90(10):1132–1139Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sherwood OD (2004) Relaxin’s physiological roles and other diverse actions. Endocr Rev 25(2):205–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniela Aldabe
    • 1
  • Daniel Cury Ribeiro
    • 2
    • 3
  • Stephan Milosavljevic
    • 2
  • Melanie Dawn Bussey
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Physical EducationUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.Centre for Physiotherapy Research, School of PhysiotherapyUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  3. 3.Otago PolytechnicOtago Institute of Sport and AdventureDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations