European Spine Journal

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 660–665 | Cite as

Ultra-long-term outcome of surgically treated far-lateral, extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations: a single-center series

  • Gerhard Marquardt
  • Markus Bruder
  • Stephanie Theuss
  • Matthias Setzer
  • Volker Seifert
Original Article



Far-lateral extraforaminal lumbar disc herniation is an uncommon cause of nerve root entrapment, and studies addressing the long-term outcome of surgically treated patients are few. The purpose of this study was to analyze the ultra-long-term outcome of patients who were treated via a lateral approach.


The medical reports of 138 consecutive patients were analyzed with regard to signs and symptoms, operative findings, complications, and short-term outcome (6 weeks). To assess long-term results, standardized telephone interviews were performed using a structured questionnaire. The patients were questioned about pain using the verbal rating scale and persisting symptoms, if any. Other queries were related to the Oswestry Disability Index. Subjective satisfaction with the result of surgery was classified as excellent (no pain), good (some pain), fair (moderate pain), and poor (unchanged or worse) based on MacNab classification.


At short-term follow-up, major and moderate leg pain had decreased from 99.3 to 5.1% and low back pain from 97.8 to 2.8%. Sensory and motor deficits, however, were still present in the majority of patients. A total of 87 telephone interviews were conducted, and the mean follow-up was 146 months. As many as 49 patients (56.3%) reported complete relief of symptoms, 14 patients (16.1%) had minor ailments under physical stress, and 24 patients (27.6%) had permanent residual symptoms. The most common complaint was remaining sensory disturbance. Despite residual symptoms, the vast majority of patients expressed satisfaction with the result of surgery. The outcome was subjectively rated as follows: 75.9% excellent (66 patients), 18.4% good (16 patients), 4.6% fair (4 patients), and 1.1% poor (1 patient).


The lateral approach is a minimally invasive and safe procedure with low complication rates. The profit from surgery is maintained beyond the usual postoperative observation periods. Thus, ultimate outcome at ultra-long-term follow-up is very gratifying in the vast majority of patients.


Far-lateral disc herniation Extraforaminal disc herniation Lumbar disc herniation Paraspinal approach Lateral approach 


  1. 1.
    Bombardier C (2000) Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:3100–3103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chang SB, Lee SH, Ahn Y, Kim JM (2006) Risk factor for unsatisfactory outcome after lumbar foraminal and far lateral microdecompression. Spine 31:1163–1167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choi G, Lee SH, Bhanot A, Raiturker PP, Chae YS (2007) Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy for extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations: extraforaminal targeted fragmentectomy technique using working channel endoscope. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cork RC, Isaac I, Elsharydah A, Saleemi S, Zavisca F, Alexander L (2004) A comparison of the verbal rating scale and the visual analog scale for pain assessment. Internet J Anesthesiol 8(1)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Darden BV, Wade JF, Alexander R, Wood KE, Rhyne AL, Hicks JR (1995) Far lateral disc herniations treated by microscopic fragment excision. Techniques and results. Spine 20:1500–1505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis RA (1994) A long-term outcome analysis of 984 surgically treated herniated lumbar discs. J Neurosurg 80:415–421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, Roland M, von Korff M, Waddell G (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:2003–2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Donaldson WF 3rd, Star MJ, Thorne RP (1993) Surgical treatment for the far lateral herniated lumbar disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:1263–1267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Epstein NE (1995) Evaluation of varied surgical approaches used in the management of 170 far-lateral lumbar disc herniations: indications and results. J Neurosurg 83:648–656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fairbanks JE, Couper JC, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garrido E, Connaughton PN (1991) Unilateral facetectomy approach for lateral lumbar disc herniation. J Neurosurg 74:754–756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gioia G, Mandelli D, Capaccioni B, Randelli F, Tessari L (1999) Surgical treatment of far lateral lumbar disc herniation. Identification of compressed root and discectomy by lateral approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1952–1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hodges SD, Humphreys SC, Eck JC, Covington LA (1999) The surgical treatment of far lateral L3–L4 and L4–L5 disc herniations. A modified technique and outcomes analysis of 25 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1243–1246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kunogi J, Hasue M (1991) Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16:1312–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    MacNab I (1971) Negative disc exploration: an analysis of the cause of nerve root involvement in sixty-eight patients. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 53:891–903Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Hara LJ, Marshall RW (1997) Far lateral disc herniation. The key to the intertransverse approach. J Bone Jt Surg Br 79:943–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ohnhaus EE, Adler R (1975) Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison of the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain 1:379–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ozveren MF, Bilge T, Barut S, Eras M (2004) Combined approach for far-lateral lumbar disc herniation. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 44:118–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Porchet F, Chollet-Bornand A, de Tribolet N (1999) Long-term follow up of patients surgically treated by the far-lateral approach for foraminal and extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations. J Neurosurg 90(1 Suppl):59–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Quaglietta P, Cassitto D, Corriero AS, Corriero G (2005) Paraspinal approach to the far lateral disc herniations: retrospective study on 42 cases. Acta Neurochir 92:115–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ryang YM, Rohde I, Ince A, Oertel MF, Gilsbach JM, Rohde V (2005) Lateral transmuscular or combined interlaminar/paraisthmic approach to lateral lumbar disc herniation? A comparative clinical series of 48 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Pyschiatry 76:971–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Salame K, Lidar Z (2010) Minimally invasive approach to far lateral lumbar disc herniation: technique and clinical results. Acta Neurochir 152:663–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sasani M, Ozer AF, Oktenoglu T, Canbulat N, Sarioglu AC (2007) Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy for far lateral lumbar disc herniations: prospective study and outcome of 66 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 50:91–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Siebner HR, Faulhauer K (1990) Frequency and specific surgical management of far lateral lumbar disc herniations. Acta Neurochir 105:124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Silverplats K, Lind B, Zoëga B, Halldin K, Rutberg L, Gellerstedt M, Brisby H (2010) Clinical factors of importance for outcome after lumbar disc herniation surgery: long-term follow-up. Eur Spine J 19:1459–1467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vogelsang JP, Maier H (2008) Clinical results and surgical technique for the treatment of extreme lateral lumbar disc herniations: the minimally invasive microscopically assisted percutaneous approach. Zentralbl Neurochir 69:35–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Weiner BK, Dabbah M (2005) Lateral lumbar disc herniations treated with a paraspinal approach: an independent assessment of longer-term outcomes. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:519–521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerhard Marquardt
    • 1
  • Markus Bruder
    • 1
  • Stephanie Theuss
    • 1
  • Matthias Setzer
    • 1
  • Volker Seifert
    • 1
  1. 1.Neurosurgical ClinicJohann Wolfgang Goethe-UniversityFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations