European Spine Journal

, Volume 21, Issue 7, pp 1265–1272 | Cite as

Physical fitness, rather than self-reported physical activities, is more strongly associated with low back pain: evidence from a working population

  • Hans Heneweer
  • H. Susan J. Picavet
  • Filip Staes
  • Henri Kiers
  • Luc Vanhees
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

Physical activity is suggested to be important for low back pain (LBP) but a major problem is the limited validity of the measurement of physical activities, which is usually based on questionnaires. Physical fitness can be viewed as a more objective measurement and our question was how physical activity based on self-reports and objective measured levels of physical fitness were associated with LBP.

Materials and methods

We analyzed cross-sectional data of 1,723 police employees. Physical activity was assessed by questionnaire (SQUASH) measuring type of activity, intensity, and time spent on these activities. Physical fitness was based on muscular dynamic endurance capacity and peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak). Severe LBP, interfering with functioning, was defined by pain ratings ≥4 on a scale of 0–10.

Results

Higher levels of physical fitness, both muscular and aerobic, were associated with less LBP (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.34–0.86, respectively, 0.59: 95%CI: 0.35–0.99). For self-reported physical activity, both a low and a high level of the total physical activity pattern were associated with an increase of LBP (OR: 1.52; 95%CI: 1.00–2.31, respectively, 1.60; 95%CI: 1.05–2.44).

Conclusion

These findings suggest that physical activity of an intensity that improves physical fitness may be important in the prevention of LBP.

Keywords

Low back pain Physical activity Physical fitness Lifestyle 

References

  1. 1.
    van Weering MG, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM, Tönis TM et al (2009) Daily physical activities in chronic lower back pain patients assessed with accelerometry. Eur J Pain 13(6):649–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jacob T, Baras M, Zeev A et al (2004) Physical activities and low back pain: a community-based study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36(1):9–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heneweer H, Staes F, Aufdemkampe G, van Rijn M et al (2011) Physical activity and low back pain: a systematic review of recent literature. Eur Spine J 20:826–845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sitthipornvorakul E, Janwantanakul P, Purepong N et al (2011) The association between physical activity and neck and low back pain: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 20(5):677–689PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heneweer H, Vanhees L, Picavet HSJ (2009) Physical activity and low back pain: a U-shaped relation? Pain 143:21–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shephard RJ (2003) Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires. Br J Sports Med 37:197–206Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vanhees L, Lefevre J, Philippaerts R et al (2005) How to assess physical activity? How to assess physical fitness? Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 12(2):102–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Picavet HSJ, Schuit AJ (2003) Physical activity: a risk factor for low back pain in the general population? J Epidemiol Commun Health 57:517–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Protas EJ (1996) Aerobic exercise in the rehabilitation of individuals with chronic low back pain: a review. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med 8:283–295Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Verbunt JA, Westerterp KR, van der Heijden GJ et al (2001) Physical activity in daily life in patients with chronic low back pain. Arch Med Rehabil 82:726–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Picavet HSJ, Wendel-Vos GCW (2011) Use it or lose it, but how to use? Pain Commentary (in press)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blair SN, Cheng Y, Holder JS (2001) Is physical activity or physical fitness more important in defining health benefits? Med Sci Sports Exerc 33(6 Suppl):S379–S399PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duque I, Parra JH, Duvallet A (2009) Physical deconditioning in chronic low back pain. J Rehabil Med 41:262–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Adams MA, Mannion AF, Dolan P (1999) Personal risk factors for first time low back pain. Spine 24:2497–2505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alaranta H, Luoto S, Heliovaara M et al (1995) Static back endurance and the risk of low back pain. Clin Biomech 10:323–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Biering Sørensen F (1984) Physical measurements as risk indicators for low back trouble over a one year period. Spine 9:106–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stevenson JM, Weber CL, Smith JT et al (2001) A longitudinal study of the development of low back pain in an industrial population. Spine 26:1370–1377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Suni JH, Oja P, Miilunpalo SI et al (1998) Health-related fitness test battery for adults: associations with perceived health, mobility, and back function and symptoms. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79(5):559–569PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Takala EP, Viikari Juntura E (2000) Do functional tests predict low back pain? Spine 25:2126–2132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smeets RJEM, Wittink H, Hidding A et al (2006) Do patients with chronic low back pain have a lower level of aerobic fitness than healthy controls? Spine 31(1):90–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Verbunt JA, Seelen HA, Vlaeyen JWS et al (2003) Disuse and deconditioning in chronic low back pain: concepts and hypothesis on contributing mechanisms. Eur J Pain 84:9–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Burton AK, Balague F, Cardon G et al (2005) How to prevent low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 19:541–555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Linton SJ, van Tulder MW (2001) Preventive interventions for back and neck pain problems: what is the evidence? Spine 26:778–787PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM (1995) A cost-of illness study of back pain in the Netherlands. Pain 62:233–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Krebs EE, Carey TS, Weinberger M (2007) Accuracy of the pain numeric scale as a screening test in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 22(10):1453–1458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wendel-Vos GCW, Schuit AJ (2002) Short questionnaire to assess health enhancing physical activity. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Center for Chronic Diseases Epidemiology, BilthovenGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wendel-Vos GCW, Schuit AJ, Saris WHM et al (2003) Reproducibility and relative validity of the Short Questionnaire to Assess Health-enhancing physical activity. J Clin Epidemiol 56:1163–1169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC et al (2000) Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32(suppl 9):498–504Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Grundy SM, Cleeman JL, Daniels SR et al (2005) Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart and Lung, and Blood Institute scientific statement. Circulation 112:2735–2752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hamberg-van Reenen HH, Ariens GA, Blatter BM et al (2006) Is an imbalance between physical capacity and exposure to work-related physical factors associated with low-back, neck or shoulder pain? Scand J Work Environ Health 32:190–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Suni JH (1999) Health-related fitness test battery for middle-aged adults: with emphasis on musculoskeletal and motor tests. Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hamberg-van Reenen HH, Ariëns GAM, Blatter BM et al (2007) A systematic review of the relation between physical capacity and future low back and neck/shoulder pain. Pain 130:93–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    George SZ, Teyhen DS, Wu SS et al (2009) Psychosocial education improves low back pain beliefs: results from a cluster randomized clinical trial (NCT00373009) in a primary prevention setting. Eur Spine J 18(7):1050–1058PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kremer EF, Block A, Gaylor MS (1981) Behavioral approaches to treatment of chronic pain: the inaccuracy of patient self-reported measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 62(4):188–191PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fogelholm M, Malmberg J, Suni J et al (2006) International Physical Activity Questionnaire: validity against fitness. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38(4):753–760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rzewnicki R, Vanden Auweele Y, De Bourdeauhuij I (2003) Addressing overreporting on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) telephone survey with a population sample. Public Health Nutr 6(3):299–305Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Klesges RC, Eck LH, Mellon MW (1990) The accuracy of self-reports of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 22:690–697PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jacobs DR, Ainsworth BE, Hartman TJ, Leon AS (1993) A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25(1):81–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Williamson A, Hoggart B (2005) Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs 14:789–804Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Fejer R, Jordan A, Hartvigsen J (2005) Categorising the severity of neck pain: establishment of cut points for use in clinical and epidemiological research. Pain 119:176–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Serlin RC, Mendoza TR, Nakamura Y et al (1995) When is cancer pain mild, moderate or severe? Grading pain severity by its interference with function. Pain 61:277–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Turner JA, Franklin G, Heagerty PJ et al (2004) The association between pain and disability. Pain 112:307–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Heneweer
    • 1
  • H. Susan J. Picavet
    • 2
  • Filip Staes
    • 3
  • Henri Kiers
    • 1
  • Luc Vanhees
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Applied Sciences, Research Department Lifestyle and HealthUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Department for Prevention and Health Services ResearchBilthovenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation SciencesKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations