MRI findings are more common in selected patients with acute low back pain than controls?
- 365 Downloads
The purpose of this study is to investigate if lumbar disc pathology identified on MRI scans is more common in patients with acute, likely discogenic, low back pain than matched controls.
We compared rates of MRI findings between 30 cases with low back pain and 30 pain-free controls. Cases were patients presenting for care with likely discogenic low back pain (demonstrated centralisation with repeated movement testing), of moderate intensity and with minimal past history of back pain. Controls were matched for age, gender and past history of back pain. Cases and controls underwent MRI scanning which was read for the presence of a range of MRI findings by two blinded assessors.
The presence of disc degeneration, modic changes and disc herniation significantly altered the odds of a participant being a case or control. For example subjects were 5.2 times more likely to be a case than a control when disc degeneration grade of ≥3 was present, and 6.0 times more likely with modic changes. The presence of a high-intensity zone or annular tear was found to significantly alter odds for one assessor but not the other assessor.
MRI findings including disc degeneration, modic changes and herniation are more common in selected people with current acute (likely discogenic) low back pain than in controls without current low back pain. Further investigation of the value of MRI findings as prognostic factors and as treatment effect modifiers is required to assess the potential clinical importance of these findings.
KeywordsLow back pain Magnetic resonance imaging Case–control study Diagnosis Sensitivity Disc degeneration
This work was supported by Faculty of Health Sciences Grant, The University of Sydney.
Conflict of interest
- 1.van Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T, Breen A, del Real MTG, Hutchinson A, Koes B, Laerum E, Malmivaara A, Cost B13 Working Group on Guidelines for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain in Primary Care (2006) Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 2):S169–S191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Australian Acute Musculoskeletal Pain Guidelines Group (2004) Evidence-based management of acute musculoskeletal pain—a guide for clinicians. Australian Academic Press, Bowen HillsGoogle Scholar
- 5.Merskey H, Bogduk N (1994) Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. IASP Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar
- 6.Standards Committee of the International Spine Intervention Society (2004) International Spine Intervention Society practice guidelines for spinal diagnostic and treatment procedures In: Bogduk N (ed) International Spine Intervention SocietyGoogle Scholar
- 17.Fardon DF, Milette PC, Combined Task Forces of the North American Spine Society ASoSR, American Society of N (2001) Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Recommendations of the Combined task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine 26:E93–E113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar