Cauda equina syndrome seems to be a very rare complication of spinal manipulations. Only few cases, in fact, were referred in literature in the past decades. Most of them are very old and poorly documented evoking doubts about the pathogenetic relationship between the spinal maneuvers and the onset of the syndrome. We observed and treated a 42-year-old patient who complained a rapid onset of saddle hypoparesthesia and urine retention only a few hours after the spinal manipulation performed for L5-S1 herniated disc. The comparison of the two following MRIs performed before and after the manipulations seems to prove a close pathogenetic relationship. The patient was operated soon after the admission to our emergency department and 1 year later he referred an incomplete recovery of the syndrome. The case offered the opportunity to update the literature. The review revealed only three cases from the beginning of the current century that confirm the rarity of the syndrome. Based on the data emerging from the official literature, safety of the manipulations and its pathogenetic aspects in causing lumbar radiculopathies are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Conflict of interest
None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.
Oliphant D (2004) Safety of spinal manipulation in the treatment of lumbar disk herniations: a systematic review and risk assessment. J Manip Physiol Ther 27:197–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrett AG, Kleynhans AM (1992) Complications from manipulation of the low back. Chiropr J Aust 27:129–140Google Scholar
Assendelft WJ, Bouter LM, Knipschild PG (1996) Complications of spinal manipulation: a comprehensive review of the literature. J Fam Pract 42:475–480PubMedGoogle Scholar
Ernst E (2001) Prospective investigations into the safety of spinal manipulation. J Pain Symptom Manag 21:238–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisi AJ, Holmes EJ, Ammendolia C (2005) High-velocity low-amplitude spinal manipulation for symptomatic lumbar disk disease: a systematic review of the literature. J Manip Physiol Ther 28:429–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldeman S, Rubinstein SM (1992) Cauda equina syndrome in patients undergoing manipulation of the lumbar spine. Spine 17:1469–1473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowitz HD, Dolce DT (1997) Cauda equina syndrome due to sequestrated recurrent disk herniation after chiropractic manipulation. Orthopedics 20:652–653PubMedGoogle Scholar
Morandi X, Riffaud L, Houedakor J et al (2004) Caudal spinal cord ischemia after lumbar vertebral manipulation. Joint Bone Spine 71:334–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solheim O, Jorgensen JV, Nygaard OP (2007) Lumbar epidural hematoma after chiropractic manipulation for lower-back pain: case report. Neurosurgery 61:E170–E171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmivaara A, Pohjola R (1982) Cauda equina syndrome caused by chiropraxis on a patient previously free of lumbar spine symptoms. Lancet 2:986–987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallinaro P, Cartesegna M (1983) Three cases of lumbar disc rupture and one of cauda equina associated with spinal manipulation (chiropraxis). Lancet 1:411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silver JR (2001) The earliest case of cauda equina syndrome caused by manipulation of the lumbar spine under a general anaesthetic. Spinal Cord 39:51–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyiendo J, Haldeman S (1987) A prospective study of 2000 patients attending a chiropractic college teaching clinic. Med Care 25:516–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee KP, Carlini WG, McCormick GF et al (1995) Neurologic complications following chiropractic manipulation: a survey of California neurologists. Neurology 45:1213–1215PubMedGoogle Scholar