European Spine Journal

, Volume 20, Issue 7, pp 1166–1173

The outcome of decompression surgery for lumbar herniated disc is influenced by the level of concomitant preoperative low back pain

  • F. S. Kleinstueck
  • T. Fekete
  • D. Jeszenszky
  • A. F. Mannion
  • D. Grob
  • F. Lattig
  • U. Mutter
  • F. Porchet
Original Article

Abstract

Decompression surgery is a common and generally successful treatment for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, clinical practice raises some concern that the presence of concomitant low back pain (LBP) may have a negative influence on the overall outcome of treatment. This prospective study sought to examine on how the relative severity of LBP influences the outcome of decompression surgery for LDH. The SSE Spine Tango System was used to acquire the data from 308 patients. Inclusion criteria were LDH, first-time surgery, maximum 1 affected level, and decompression as the only procedure. Before and 12 months after surgery, patients completed the multidimensional Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI; includes 0–10 leg/buttock pain (LP) and LBP scales); at 12 months, global outcome was rated on a Likert scale and dichotomised into “good” and “poor” groups. In the “good” outcome group, mean baseline LP was 2.8 (SD 3.1) points higher than LBP; in the “poor” group, the corresponding value was 1.1 (SD 2.9) (p < 0.001 between groups). Significantly fewer patients with back pain as their “main problem” had a good outcome (69% good) when compared with those who reported leg/buttock pain (84% good) as the main problem (p = 0.04). In multivariate regression analyses (controlling for age, gender, co-morbidity), baseline LBP intensity was a significant predictor of the 12-month COMI score, and of the global outcome (each p < 0.05) (higher LBP, worse outcome). In conclusion, patients with more back pain showed significantly worse outcomes after decompression surgery for LDH. This finding fits with general clinical experience, but has rarely been quantified in the many predictor studies conducted to date. Consideration of the severity of concomitant LBP in LDH may assist in establishing realistic patient expectations before the surgery.

Keywords

Herniated disc Outcome Back pain Predictors 

References

  1. 1.
    Awad JN, Moskovich R (2006) Lumbar disc herniations: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 443:183–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barth M, Diepers M, Weiss C, Thome C (2008) Two-year outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy versus microscopic sequestrectomy: part 2: radiographic evaluation and correlation with clinical outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benoist M (2002) The natural history of lumbar disc herniation and radiculopathy. Joint Bone Spine 69:155–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chin KR, Tomlinson DT, Auerbach JD, Shatsky JB, Deirmengian CA (2008) Success of lumbar microdiscectomy in patients with Modic changes and low-back pain: a prospective pilot study. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:139–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    den Boer JJ, Oostendorp RA, Beems T, Munneke M, Oerlemans M, Evers AW (2006) A systematic review of bio-psychosocial risk factors for an unfavourable outcome after lumbar disc surgery. Eur Spine J 15:527–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jansson KA, Nemeth G, Granath F, Jonsson B, Blomqvist P (2005) Health-related quality of life in patients before and after surgery for a herniated lumbar disc. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:959–964PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jonsson B, Annertz M, Sjoberg C, Stromqvist B (1997) A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Five-year follow-up by an independent observer. Spine 22:2938–2944PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Junge A, Frohlich M, Ahrens S, Hasenbring M, Sandler A, Grob D, Dvorak J (1996) Predictors of bad and good outcome of lumbar spine surgery. A prospective clinical study with 2 years’ follow up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:1056–1064 (discussion 1064–1065)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kagaya H, Takahashi H, Sugawara K, Kuroda T, Takahama M, Haro H, Maekawa S, Hamada Y, Epstein NE, Hood DC (2005) Quality of life assessment before and after lumbar disc surgery. J Orthop Sci 10:486–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kleinstuck FS, Grob D, Lattig F, Bartanusz V, Porchet F, Jeszenszky D, O’Riordan D, Mannion AF (2009) The influence of preoperative back pain on the outcome of lumbar decompression surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1198–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kosteljanetz M, Espersen JO, Halaburt H, Miletic T (1984) Predictive value of clinical and surgical findings in patients with lumbago-sciatica. A prospective study (Part I). Acta Neurochir (Wien) 73:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Magnaes B (1999) Surgical treatment of low back pain. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 119:1773–1777PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mannion AF, Elfering A (2006) Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 1):S93–S108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer NK, Jacobshagen N, Dvorak J, Boos N (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14:1014–1026PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mannion AF, Junge A, Elfering A, Dvorak J, Porchet F, Grob D (2009) Great expectations: really the novel predictor of outcome after spinal surgery? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1590–1599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstück F, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective: Part 1. The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in clinical practice. Eur Spine J 18:367–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Matsui H, Kanamori M, Kawaguchi Y, Kitagawa H, Nakamura H, Tsuji H (1997) Clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics of compressed lumbar nerve roots. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:2100–2105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mayer HM (2005) The delayed OP-indications for surgery of lumbar disc herniations. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 143:287–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nykvist F, Alaranta H, Hurme M, Karppi SL (1991) Clinical findings as outcome predictors in rehabilitation of patients with sciatica. Int J Rehabil Res 14:131–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pearson AM, Blood EA, Frymoyer JW, Herkowitz H, Abdu WA, Woodward R, Longley M, Emery SE, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Weinstein JN (2008) SPORT lumbar intervertebral disk herniation and back pain: does treatment, location, or morphology matter? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:428–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peul WC, Arts MP, Brand R, Koes BW (2009) Timing of surgery for sciatica: subgroup analysis alongside a randomized trial. Eur Spine J 18:538–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Postacchini F, Giannicola G, Cinotti G (2002) Recovery of motor deficits after microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:1040–1045PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rothoerl RD, Woertgen C, Brawanski A (2002) When should conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation be ceased and surgery considered? Neurosurg Rev 25:162–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saal JA (1996) Natural history and nonoperative treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:2S–9SGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wai EK, Howse K, Pollock JW, Dornan H, Vexler L, Dagenais S (2009) The reliability of determining “leg dominant pain”. Spine J 9:447–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Waris E, Eskelin M, Hermunen H, Kiviluoto O, Paajanen H (2007) Disc degeneration in low back pain: a 17-year follow-up study using magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:681–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Skinner JS, Hanscom B, Tosteson AN, Herkowitz H, Fischgrund J, Cammisa FP, Albert T, Deyo RA (2006) Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort. JAMA 296:2451–2459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, Abdu WA, Herkowitz H, Hilibrand A, Albert T, Fischgrund J (2008) Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2789–2800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yorimitsu E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Hirabayashi K (2001) Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:652–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. S. Kleinstueck
    • 1
  • T. Fekete
    • 1
  • D. Jeszenszky
    • 1
  • A. F. Mannion
    • 1
  • D. Grob
    • 1
  • F. Lattig
    • 1
  • U. Mutter
    • 1
  • F. Porchet
    • 1
  1. 1.Spine Center, Schulthess KlinikZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations