Responsiveness of the 24-, 18- and 11-item versions of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
- 262 Downloads
Several versions of the 24-item Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) have been proposed; however, their responsiveness has not been extensively explored. The objective of this study was to compare the responsiveness of four versions of the RMDQ. Perceived disability was measured using the 24-item, two 18-item and an 11-item RMDQ on 1,069 low back pain patients from six randomised controlled trials. Responsiveness was calculated using effect size, Guyatt’s responsiveness index (GRI) and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Effect size analyses showed that both 18-item versions of the RMDQ were superior to the 24- and 11-item versions of the RMDQ. GRI showed that the 24- and 18-item versions of the RMDQ were similar but more responsive than the 11-item. ROC curves revealed that the 11-item was less responsive than the other three versions, which had similar responsiveness. The results of this study demonstrate that the 24-item and both 18-item versions of the RMDQ have similar responsiveness with all having superior responsiveness to the 11-item.
KeywordsLow back pain Questionnaires ROC curve Validity
Luciana Macedo holds a PhD scholarship jointly funded by the University of Sydney and the Australian Government. Chris Maher’s research fellowship is funded by Australia’s National Health and Medical Research Council. Jane Latimer’s research fellowship is funded by the Australian Research Council. Luciana Machado’s postdoctoral fellowship is funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais, FAPEMIG, Brazil.
Conflict of interest
- 7.Williams RM, Myers AM (2001) Support for a shortened Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire for patietns with acute low back pain. Physiother Can 53:60–66Google Scholar
- 13.Hancock MJ, Maher CG, Latimer J, McLachlan AJ, Cooper CW, Day RO, Spindler MF, McAuley JH (2007) Assessment of diclofenac or spinal manipulative therapy, or both, in addition to recommended first-line treatment for acute low back pain: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 370:1638–1643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Macedo LG, Latimer J, Maher CG, Hodges PW, Nicholas M, Tonkin L, McAuley JH, Stafford R (2008) Motor control or graded activity exercises for chronic low back pain? A randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- 15.Ferreira ML, Ferreira PH, Latimer J, Herbert RD, Hodges PW, Jennings MD, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Ferreira ML, Ferreira PH, Latimer J, Herbert RD, Hodges PW, Jennings MD, Maher CG, Refshauge KM (2007) Comparison of general exercise, motor control exercise and spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low back pain: a randomized trial. Pain 131:31–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Cheng A. The HONG KONG ROC program: Chinese University of Hong Kong, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. http://department.obg.cuhk.edu.hk/researchsupport/statmenu.asp
- 22.Cohen J, Cohen P (1983) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar