Sagittal plane deformity: an overview of interpretation and management
- 1.5k Downloads
The impact of sagittal plane alignment on the treatment of spinal disorders is of critical importance. A failure to recognise malalignment in this plane can have significant consequences for the patient not only in terms of pain and deformity, but also social interaction due to deficient forward gaze. A good understanding of the principles of sagittal balance is vital to achieve optimum outcomes when treating spinal disorders. Even when addressing problems in the coronal plane, an awareness of sagittal balance is necessary to avoid future complications. The normal spine has lordotic curves in the cephalad and caudal regions with a kyphotic curve in between. Overall, there is a positive correlation between thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis. There are variations on the degree of normal curvature but nevertheless this shape allows equal distribution of forces across the spinal column. It is the disruption of this equilibrium by pathological processes or, as in most cases, ageing that results in deformity. This leads to adaptive changes in the pelvis and lower limbs. The effects of limb alignment on spinal posture are well documented. We now also know that changes in pelvic posture also affect spinal alignment. Sagittal malalignment presents as an exaggeration or deficiency of normal lordosis or kyphosis. Most cases seen in clinical practise are due to kyphotic deformity secondary to inflammatory, degenerative or post-traumatic disorders. They may also be secondary to infection or tumours. There is usually pain and functional disability along with concerns about self-image and social interaction due to inability to maintain a horizontal gaze. The resultant pelvic and lower limb posture is an attempt to restore normal alignment. Addressing this complex problem requires detailed expertise and awareness of the potential pitfalls surrounding its treatment.
KeywordsSagittal Deformity Alignment Angles Management
The authors would like to thank Mr. Sanjay Purushothamdas and Dr Akash Sharma of the Spinal Surgery Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford for proof reading and organisation of the manuscript.
- 4.Boesker EH, Moe JH, Winter RB, Koop SE (2000) A determination of the normal thoracic kyphosis: a roentgenographic study of 121 normal children. J Pediatr Orthop 20:796–798Google Scholar
- 39.Roussouly P, Richard A, Vallese P, Berthonnaud E (2000) Compared effect of eggshell transpedicular lumbar osteotomy and pelvic osteotomy in correction of great sagittal imbalance. 9th International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques, Montreux, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- 41.Scoliosis Research Society. White paper on sagittal plane alignmentGoogle Scholar
- 42.Simmons EH (1994) Relation of vascular complications to the level of lumbar extension osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis. 61st Annual meeting of the American academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, New OrleansGoogle Scholar
- 44.Smith-Petersen MN, Larson CB, Aufranc OE (1945) Osteotomy of the spine for correction of flexion deformity in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 27:1–11Google Scholar
- 51.Vaz G, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2000) Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine. Eur Spine J 11:80–87Google Scholar