Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 451–457 | Cite as

Cauda equina lesions as a complication of spinal surgery

  • Simon PodnarEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Although the most common aetiology of cauda equina lesions is lumbar intervertebral disc herniation, iatrogenic lesions may also be the cause. The aim of this study was to identify and present patients in whom cauda equina lesions occurred after spinal surgery. From the author’s series of patients with cauda equina lesions, those with the appearance of sacral symptoms after spinal surgery were identified. To demonstrate lesions more objectively, electrodiagnostic studies were performed in addition to history and clinical examination. Imaging studies were also reviewed. Of 69 patients from the series, 11 patients in whom a cauda equina lesion developed after spinal surgery were identified. The aetiology comprised surgery for herniated intervertebral disc in 5 (4 performed by a single surgeon), spinal stenosis surgery in 4, and postoperative lumbar epidural haematoma in 2 patients (each performed by a different surgeon). Proportion of spinal surgeries with this complication varied from 0 to 6.6‰ in different centres. Patients with iatrogenic cauda equina lesion were significantly older (p < 0.001), and reported more severe urinary, but similar bowel and sexual symptoms compared to other patients in the series. In conclusion the study identified spinal surgery as the cause of approximately 15% of cauda equina lesions. More than a third of lesions developed after procedures performed by a single surgeon. Most of the remaining lesions could probably be avoided by better surgical technique (e.g. the use of a high-speed drill instead of a Kerrison rongeur in patients with severe spinal stenosis), or prevented by closer postoperative monitoring (e.g. in patients with postoperative lumbar epidural haematoma).

Keywords

Cauda equina Disc herniation Spinal stenosis Spinal surgery Sacral 

Abbreviations

CT

Computer tomography

EAS

External anal sphincter

EMG

Electromyography

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

MUP

Motor unit potential

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Prof. Roman Bošnjak (surgery), Prof. David B. Vodušek (neurology), Dr. Gašper Gregorič (radiology), and Dr. Dianne Jones (language) for review of the manuscript. The study was supported by the Republic of Slovenia Research Agency, Grant No. J3 7899.

References

  1. 1.
    Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39(6):681–685CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dimension Research, Inc. (2005) Z-test for two proportions calculator. http://www.dimensionresearch.com/index.html
  3. 3.
    Donovan JL, Abrams P, Peters TJ, Kay HE, Reynard J, Chapple C, De La Rosette JJ, Kondo A (1996) The ICS-’BPH’ Study: the psychometric validity and reliability of the ICSmale questionnaire. Br J Urol 77(4):554–562PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Henriques T, Olerud C, Petren-Mallmin M, Ahl T (2001) Cauda equina syndrome as a postoperative complication in five patients operated for lumbar disc herniation. Spine 26(3):293–297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jackson S, Donovan J, Brookes S, Eckford S, Swithinbank L, Abrams P (1996) The Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire: development and psychometric testing. Br J Urol 77(6):805–812PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36(1):77–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McLaren AC, Bailey SI (1986) Cauda equina syndrome: a complication of lumbar discectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 204:143–149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Podnar S (2004) Criteria for neuropathic abnormality in quantitative anal sphincter electromyography. Muscle Nerve 30(5):596–601CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Podnar S (2006) Bowel dysfunction in patients with cauda equina lesions. Eur J Neurol 13(10):1112–1117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Podnar S (2006) Nomenclature of the electrophysiologically tested sacral reflexes. Neurourol Urodyn 25(1):95–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Podnar S (2007) Epidemiology of cauda equina and conus medullaris lesions. Muscle Nerve 35(4):529–531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Podnar S (2007) Neurophysiologic studies of the penilo-cavernosus reflex: normative data. Neurourol Urodyn 26(6):864–869CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Podnar S (2007) Saddle sensation is preserved in a few patients with cauda equina or conus medullaris lesions. Eur J Neurol 14(1):48–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Podnar S, Oblak C, Vodusek DB (2002) Sexual function in men with cauda equina lesions: a clinical and electromyographic study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73(6):715–720CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Podnar S, Trsinar B, Vodusek DB (2006) Bladder dysfunction in patients with cauda equina lesions. Neurourol Urodyn 25(1):23–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A (1997) The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 49(6):822–830CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shapiro S (1993) Cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation. Neurosurgery 32(5):743–746CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vodusek DB, Amarenco G, Batra A, Benson T, Bharucha AE, Podnar S, Yang CC (2005) Clinical neurophysiology. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (eds) Incontinence. Health Publication Ltd., Plymouth (UK), pp 675–706Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Neurology, Institute of Clinical NeurophysiologyUniversity Medical Center LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations