Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 18, Issue 7, pp 1059–1065 | Cite as

An investigation of the reproducibility of ultrasound measures of abdominal muscle activation in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain

  • Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa
  • Chris G. Maher
  • Jane Latimer
  • Paul W. Hodges
  • Debra Shirley
Original Article

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) measures are used by clinicians and researchers to evaluate improvements in activity of the abdominal muscles in patients with low back pain. Studies evaluating the reproducibility of these US measures provide some information; however, little is known about the reproducibility of these US measures over time in patients with low back pain. The objectives of this study were to estimate the reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of automatic activation of the lateral abdominal wall muscles using a leg force task in patients with chronic low back pain. Thirty-five participants from an existing randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled trial participated in the study. A reproducibility analysis was undertaken from all patients using data collected at baseline and after treatment. The reproducibility of measurements of thickness, muscle activation (thickness changes) and muscle improvement/deterioration after intervention (differences in thickness changes from single images made before and after treatment) was analysed. The reproducibility of static images (thickness) was excellent (ICC2,1 = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.96–0.97, standard error of the measurement (SEM) = 0.04 cm, smallest detectable change (SDC) = 0.11 cm), the reproducibility of thickness changes was moderate (ICC2,1 = 0.72, 95% CI 0.65–0.76, SEM = 15%, SDC 41%), while the reproducibility of differences in thickness changes from single images with statistical adjustment for duplicate measures was poor (ICC2,1 = 0.44, 95% CI 0.33–0.58, SEM = 21%, SDC = 66.5%). Improvements in the testing protocol must be performed in order to enhance reproducibility of US as an outcome measure for abdominal muscle activation.

Keywords

Ultrasound Abdominal muscles Reproducibility Agreement Reliability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Physiotherapy Research Foundation, Australian Physiotherapy Association. Leonardo O. P. Costa is a PhD student supported by CAPES—Ministério da Educação—Brazil and Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais—Brazil; Chris G. Maher and Paul W. Hodges hold research fellowships funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

References

  1. 1.
    ACSM (1995) ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Williams and Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ainscough-Potts AM, Morrisey MC, Critchley DJ (2006) The response of the transverse abdominis and internal oblique to different postures. Man Ther 11:54–60. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2005.03.007 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beazell JR, Grindstaff TL, Magrum EM, Cullaty M, Hart JM, Shen FH (2006) Comparison of clinical test and real time ultrasound evaluation of muscle contraction in normals and patients with low back pain. J Man Manip Ther 14:168–169Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bunce SM, Moore AP, Hough AD (2002) M-mode ultrasound: a reliable measure of transversus abdominis thickness? Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 17:315–317. doi: 10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00011-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chiradejnant A, Maher CG, Latimer J (2003) Objective manual assessment of lumbar PA stiffness is now possible. J Manip Physiol Ther 26:34–39. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2003.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Costa LOP, Maher CG, Latimer J, Smeets RJEM (2009) Reproducibility of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging for the measurement of abdominal muscle activity: a systematic review. Phys Ther (in press)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Critchley DJ, Coutts FJ (2002) Abdominal muscle function in chronic low back pain patients: measurement with real-time ultrasound scanning. Physiotherapy 88:322–332. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60745-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM (2006) When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol 59:1033–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feldt LS, Charter RA (2003) Estimating the reliability of a test split into two parts of equal or unequal length. Psychol Methods 8:102–109. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.8.1.102 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ferreira ML, Ferreira PH, Latimer J, Herbert RD, Hodges PW, Jennings MD, Maher CG, Refshauge KM (2007) Comparison of general exercise, motor control exercise and spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low back pain: a randomized trial. Pain 131:31–37. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.12.008 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Hodges PW (2004) Changes in recruitment of the abdominal muscles in people with low back pain—ultrasound measurement of muscle activity. Spine 29:2560–2566. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000144410.89182.f9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Maher CG, Herbert RD, Refshauge K (2006) Specific stabilisation exercise for spinal and pelvic pain: a systematic review. Aust J Physiother 52:79–88PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Maher CG, Refshauge K, Latimer J (2003) Clinical ultrasound test for transversus abdominus thickness: investigation of reliability In: 13th biennial conference—musculoskeletal physiotherapy Australia. Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hides JA, Miokovic T, Belavy DL, Stanton WR, Richardson CA, Hides JA, Miokovic T, Belavy DL, Stanton WR, Richardson CA (2007) Ultrasound imaging assessment of abdominal muscle function during drawing-in of the abdominal wall: an intrarater reliability study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 37:480–486PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hodges PW, Pengel LHM, Herbert RD, Gandevia SC (2003) Measurement of muscle contraction with ultrasound imaging. Muscle Nerve 27:682–692. doi: 10.1002/mus.10375 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hodges PW, Richardson CA (1999) Altered trunk muscle recruitment in people with low back pain with upper limb movement at different speeds. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80:1005–1012. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90052-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hodges PW, Richardson CA (1998) Delayed postural contraction of transversus abdominis in low back pain associated with movement of the lower limb. J Spinal Disord 11:46–56. doi: 10.1097/00002517-199802000-00008 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hodges PW, Richardson CA (1996) Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain—a motor control evaluation of transversus abdominis. Spine 21:2640–2650. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199611150-00014 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    John EK, Beith ID (2007) Can activity within the external abdominal oblique be measured using real-time ultrasound imaging? Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 22:972–979. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kidd AW, Magee S, Richardson CA (2002) Reliability of real-time ultrasound for the assessment of the transversus abdominis function. J Gravit Physiol 9:131–132Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Macedo LG, Latimer J, Maher CG, Hodges PW, Nicholas M, Tonkin L, McAuley JH, Stafford R (2008) Motor control or graded activity exercises for chronic low back pain? A randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:65. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-65 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Macedo LG, Maher CG, Latimer J, McAuley J (2009) Motor control exercises for persistent nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review. Phys Ther 89(1):9–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Maher C, Adams R (1994) Reliability of pain and stiffness assessments in clinical manual lumbar spine examination. Phys Ther 74:801–809PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maher CG, Latimer J, Adams R (1998) An investigation of the reliability and validity of posteroanterior spinal stiffness judgments made using a reference-based protocol. Phys Ther 78:829–837PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maher CG, Latimer J, Hodges PW, Refshauge KM, Moseley GL, Herbert RD, Costa LOP, McAuley J (2005) The effect of motor control exercises versus placebo in patients with chronic low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 6:1–8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-54 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mannion AF, Pulkovski N, Gubler D, Gorelick M, O’Riordan D, Loupas T, Schenk P, Gerber H, Sprott H (2008) Muscle thickness changes during abdominal hollowing: an assessment of between-day measurement error in controls and patients with chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 17:494–501. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0589-x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McMeeken JM, Beith ID, Newham DJ, Milligan P, Critchley DJ (2004) The relationship between EMG and change in thickness of transversus abdominis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 19:337–342. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Norasteh A, Ebrahimi E, Salavati M, Rafiei J, Abbasnejad E (2007) Reliability of B-mode ultrasonography for abdominal muscles in asymptomatic and patients with acute low back pain. J Body Mov Ther 11:17–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2005.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pietrek M, Sheikhzadeh A, Hagins M, Nordin M (2000) Evaluation of abdominal muscles by ultrasound imaging: reliability, and comparison to electromyography. Eur Spine J 9:309Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Springer BA, Mielcarek BJ, Nesfield TK, Teyhen DS (2006) Relationships among lateral abdominal muscles, gender, body mass index, and hand dominance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36:289–297PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Terwee CB, Bot SDM, Boer MR, van der Windta DAWM, Knola DL, Dekkera J, Boutera LM, Veta HCW (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Teyhen DS, Miltenberger CE, Deiters HM, Del Toro YM, Pulliam JN, Childs JD, Boyles RE, Flynn TW (2005) The use of ultrasound imaging of the abdominal drawing-in maneuver in subjects with low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 35:346–355PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Teyhen DS, Rieger JL, Westrick RB, Miller AC, Molloy JM, Childs JD (2008) Changes in deep abdominal muscle thickness during common trunk-strengthening exercises using ultrasound imaging. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 38:596–605PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa
    • 1
  • Chris G. Maher
    • 1
  • Jane Latimer
    • 1
  • Paul W. Hodges
    • 2
  • Debra Shirley
    • 3
  1. 1.The George Institute for International HealthThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.NHMRC Centre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury and Health, School of Health of Rehabilitation SciencesThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.Faculty of Health SciencesThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations