Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a progressive growth disease that affects spinal anatomy, mobility, and left-right trunk symmetry. Consequently, AIS can modify human locomotion. Very few studies have investigated a simple activity like walking in a cohort of well-defined untreated patients with scoliosis. The first goal of this study is to evaluate the effects of scoliosis and scoliosis severity on kinematic and electromyographic (EMG) gait variables compared to an able-bodied population. The second goal is to look for any asymmetry in these parameters during walking. Thirteen healthy girls and 41 females with untreated AIS, with left thoracolumbar or lumbar primary structural curves were assessed. AIS patients were divided into three clinical subgroups (group 1 < 20°, group 2 between 20 and 40°, and group 3 > 40°). Gait analysis included synchronous bilateral kinematic and EMG measurements. The subjects walked on a treadmill at 4 km/h (comfortable speed). The tridimensional (3D) shoulder, pelvis, and lower limb motions were measured using 22 reflective markers tracked by four infrared cameras. The EMG timing activity was measured using bipolar surface electrodes on quadratus lumborum, erector spinae, gluteus medius, rectus femoris, semitendinosus, tibialis anterior, and gastrocnemius muscles. Statistical comparisons (ANOVA) were performed across groups and sides for kinematic and EMG parameters. The step length was reduced in AIS compared to normal subjects (7% less). Frontal shoulder, pelvis, and hip motion and transversal hip motion were reduced in scoliosis patients (respectively, 21, 27, 28, and 22% less). The EMG recording during walking showed that the quadratus lumborum, erector spinae, gluteus medius, and semitendinosus muscles contracted during a longer part of the stride in scoliotic patients (46% of the stride) compared with normal subjects (35% of the stride). There was no significant difference between scoliosis groups 1, 2, and 3 for any of the kinematic and EMG parameters, meaning that severe scoliosis was not associated with increased differences in gait parameters compared to mild scoliosis. Scoliosis was not associated with any kinematic or EMG left–right asymmetry. In conclusion, scoliosis patients showed significant but slight modifications in gait, even in cases of mild scoliosis. With the naked eye, one could not see any difference from controls, but with powerful gait analysis technology, the pelvic frontal motion (right–left tilting) was reduced, as was the motion in the hips and shoulder. Surprisingly, no asymmetry was noted but the spine seemed dynamically stiffened by the longer contraction time of major spinal and pelvic muscles. Further studies are needed to evaluate the origin and consequences of these observations.
Scoliosis Gait Asymmetry Electromyography
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access
This work was supported by the Orthopedie Van Haesendonk firm.
Allenbach E, Wiest E (1953) Condition of the paravertebral musculature in idiopathic scolioses before and after grafting. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 39:588–590Google Scholar
Basmajian J (1979) Muscles alive. Their functions revealed by electromyography. Baltimore, USAGoogle Scholar
Burwell RG, Aujla RK, Freeman BJ, Dangerfield PH, Cole AA, Kirby AS, Pratt RK, Webb JK, Moulton A (2006) Patterns of extra-spinal left-right skeletal asymmetries in adolescent girls with lower spine scoliosis: relative lengthening of the ilium on the curve concavity and of right lower limb segments. Stud Health Technol Inform 123:57–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
Byrd JA 3rd (1988) Current theories on the etiology of idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 229:114–119Google Scholar
Cavagna GA, Thys H, Zamboni A (1976) The sources of external work in level walking and running. J Physiol 262:639–657PubMedGoogle Scholar
Guth V, Abbink F, Gotze HG, Heinrichs W (1978) Investigation of gait of patients with idiopathic scoliosis and the influence of the Milwaukee brace on gait (author’s transl). Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 116:631–640PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hopf C, Scheidecker M, Steffan K, Bodem F, Eysel P (1998) Gait analysis in idiopathic scoliosis before and after surgery: a comparison of the pre and postoperative muscle activation pattern. Eur Spine J 7:6–11. doi:10.1007/s005860050019PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, Blanke K (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1169–1181PubMedGoogle Scholar
Lowe TG, Edgar M, Margulies JY, Miller NH, Raso VJ, Reinker KA, Rivard CH (2000) Etiology of idiopathic scoliosis: current trends in research. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A:1157–1168PubMedGoogle Scholar
Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H, de Guise JA (2006) Comparison of sacropelvic morphology between normal adolescents and subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inform 123:195–200PubMedGoogle Scholar
Nicolopoulos KS, Burwell RG, Webb JK (1985) Stature and its components in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Cephalo-caudal disproportion in the trunk of girls. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67:594–601PubMedGoogle Scholar
Stoquart GG, Detrembleur C, Palumbo S, Deltombe T, Lejeune TM (2008) Effect of botulinum toxin injection in the rectus femoris on stiff-knee gait in people with stroke: a prospective observational study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89:56–61. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar