European Spine Journal

, 17:1727 | Cite as

Does socioeconomic status in adolescence predict low back pain in adulthood? A repeated cross-sectional study of 4,771 Danish adolescents

  • Lise Hestbaek
  • Lars Korsholm
  • Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
  • Kirsten Ohm Kyvik
Original Article

Abstract

Social and economic disadvantage is associated with general poor physical health. This relationship has been recognised for centuries, but it is unknown whether socioeconomic factors have a specific influence on low back pain (LBP). Furthermore, it is unknown how social and economic disadvantages in youth affect adult health. Therefore, the specific objectives of this study are to explore (1) the cross-sectional association between socioeconomic status (SES) and LBP in adolescence and (2) the longitudinal association between SES in adolescence and LBP in early adulthood. A database containing LBP data from 4,771 twins was merged with their parents’ social and economic data, available from Statistics Denmark. Low back pain data [‘any low back pain’ and ‘persistent low back pain (more than 30 days)’] were collected in 1994, when the subjects were 12–18 years of age, and collected again eight years later. Socioeconomic data of the parents (education, income, social class and long-term illness, all for both mother and father) were collected in 1994. Logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the associations between each parameter of parental SES in adolescence and LBP at baseline as well as at follow-up. Finally, the influence of a variable combining the different socioeconomic parameters was established. All estimates were controlled for smoking, alcohol consumption and body mass index at baseline. In the logistic regression models, only three of the 32 estimates were statistically significant. When merging the socioeconomic variables into a combined score, the results indicated that a good social background had a protective effect against the persistent LBP, while there was no association with any LBP. However, the statistical significance of this effect was unclear. We found no or very weak indications of possible relationships between social factors in adolescence and LBP at baseline and at follow-up.

Keywords

Low back pain Adolescence Socioeconomic status Social factors Parents 

References

  1. 1.
    Macleod J, Smith GD (2003) Psychosocial factors and public health: a suitable case for treatment? J Epidemiol Community Health 57:565–570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith GD, Carroll D, Rankin S, Rowan D (1992) Socioeconomic differentials in mortality: evidence from Glasgow graveyards. Br Med J 305:1554–1557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adler NE, Boyce T, Chesney MA, Folkman S, Syme L (1993) Socioeconomic inequalities in health: no easy solution. JAMA 269:3140–3145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lynch JW, Smith GD, Kaplan GA, House JS (2000) Income inequality and mortality: importance to health of individual income, psychosocial environment or material conditions. Br Med J 320:1200–1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Williams DR, Collins C (1995) US socioeconomic and racial differences in health: patterns and explanations. Annu Rev Sociol 21:349–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Larsen K, Leboeuf-Yde C (2006) Coping and backproblems: a prospective observational study of Danish military recruits. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 29:619–625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leboeuf-Yde C, Larsen K, Ahlstrand I, Volinn E (2006) Coping and back problems: analysis of multiple data sources on an entire cross-sectional cohort of Swedish military recruits. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord 7:39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leino-Arjas P, Kaila-Kangas L, Keskimäki I, Notkola V, Mutanen P (2002) Inpatient hospital care for lumbar disc disorders in Finland in relation to education, occupational class, income, and employment. Public Health 116:272–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Papageorgiou AC, Macfarlane GJ, Thomas E, Croft PR, Jayson MI, Silman AJ (1997) Psychosocial factors in the workplace—do they predict new episodes of low back pain? Evidence from the South Manchester Back Pain Study. Spine 22:1137–1142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khatun M, Ahlgren C, Hammarström A (2004) The influence of factors identified in adolescence and early adulthood on social class inequities of musculoskeletal disorders at age 30: a prospective population-based cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 33:1353–1360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leboeuf-Yde C, Wedderkopp N, Andersen LB, Froberg K, Hansen HS (2002) Back pain reporting in children and adolescents: the impact of parents’ educational level. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 25:212–220Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sjolie AN (2002) Psychosocial correlates of low-back pain in adolescents. Eur Spine J 11:582–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kristensen PL, Wedderkopp N, Moller NC, Andersen LB, Bai CN, Froberg K (2006) Tracking and prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors across socio-economic classes: a longitudinal substudy of the European Youth Heart Study. BMC Public Health 27:6–20Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lehman BJ, Taylor SE, Kiefe CI, Seeman TE (2005) Relation of childhood socioeconomic status and family environment to adult metabolic functioning in the CARDIA study. Psychosom Med 67:846–854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Poulton R, Caspi A, Milne BJ, Thomson WM, Taylor A, Sears MR, Moffitt TE (2002) Association between children’s esperience of socioeconomic disadvantage and adult health: a life-course study. Lancet 360:1640–1645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Laaksonen M, Rahkonen O, Martikainen P, Lahelma E (2005) Socioeconomic position and self-rated health: the contribution of childhood circumstances, adult socioeconomic status, and material resources. Am J Public Health 95:1403–1409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harper S, Lynch J, Hsu WL, Everson SA, Hillemeier MM, Raghunathan TE et al (2002) Life course socioeconomic conditions and adults psyhosocial functioning. Int J Epidemiol 31:395–403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gallo LC, Matthews KA (2003) Understanding the association between socioeconomic status and physical health: do negative emotions play a role? Psychol Bull 129:10–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Christensen K, Vaupel J, Holm NV et al (1995) Twin mortality after age 6: fetal origins hypothesis versus twin method. Br Med J 310:432–436Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kyvik KO, Green A, Beck-Nielsen H (1995) Concordance rates of insulin dependent diabetes melitus: a population based study of young Danish twins. Br Med J 311:913–917Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bryld LE, Agner T, Kyvik KO et al (2000) Hand eczema in twins: a questionnaire investigation. Br J Dermatol 142:298–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Skadhauge LR (1999) Genetic and environmental influence on asthma. A population based study of Danish twins. Ph.D. thesis, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hestbaek L (2003) The natural course of low back pain and early identification of high-risk populations. Ph.D. thesis, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kyvik KO, Christensen K, Skytthe A et al (1996) The Danish Twin Register. Dan Med Bull 43:467–470PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A et al (1987) Standardized Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon 18:233–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Biering-Soerensen F, Hilden J (1984) Reproducibility of the history of back trouble. Spine 9:280–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hestbaek L, Leboeuf-Yde C, Kyvik KO et al (2004) Comorbidity with low back pain. A cross-sectional population-based survey of 12–22 year olds. Spine 29:1483–1491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hestbaek L, Leboeuf-Yde C, Kyvik KO, Manniche C (2006) The course of low back pain from adolescence to adulthood: eight-year follow-up of 9,600 twins. Spine 31:468–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lise Hestbaek
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lars Korsholm
    • 3
  • Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kirsten Ohm Kyvik
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Clinical Locomotion Science, The Back Research Center, Hospital of FunenUniversity of Southern DenmarkRingeDenmark
  2. 2.Clinical Locomotion ScienceNordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical BiomechanicsOdense MDenmark
  3. 3.Research Unit of StatisticsUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense CDenmark
  4. 4.The Danish Twin Registry, Institute of Public HealthUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense CDenmark
  5. 5.Institute of Regional Health Services ResearchOdense CDenmark

Personalised recommendations