European Spine Journal

, 17:1664 | Cite as

Percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty in the treatment of cervical disc herniation

  • Jian Li
  • Deng-lu Yan
  • Zai-Heng Zhang
Original Article


Percutaneous disc decompression procedures have been performed in the past. Various percutaneous techniques such as percutaneous discectomy, laser discectomy, and nucleoplasty have been successful. Our prospective study was directly to evaluate the results of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty (PCN) surgery for cervical disc herniation, and illustrate the effectiveness of PCN in symptomatic patients who had cervical herniated discs. From July of 2002 to June of 2005, 126 consecutive patients with contained cervical disc herniations have presented at the authors’ clinic and treated by PCN. The patients’ gender distribution for PCN was 65 male, 61 female. The age of patients ranged from 34 to 66 years (mean 51.9 ± 10.2 years). The levels of involvement were 21 cases at C3–4, 30 cases at C4–5, 40 cases at C5–6, and 35 cases at C6–7. The clinical outcomes, pain reduction and the segment stability were all recorded during this study. A clinical outcome was quantified by the Macnab standard and using VAS. The angular displacement (AD) ≥11° or horizontal displacement (HD) ≥3 mm was considered to be radiographically unstable. In the results of this study, puncture of the needle into the disc space was accurately performed under X-ray guidance in all cases. There was one case where the Perc-D Spine Wand had broken in the disc space during the procedure. The partial Perc-D Spine Wand, which had broken in the disc space could not be removed by the percutaneous cervical discectomy and thus remained there. There were no recurrent cases or complications in our series. Macnab standard results were excellent in 62 cases, good in 41 cases and fair in 23 cases. The rate of excellent and good was 83.73%. The VAS scores demonstrated statistically significant improvement in PCN at the 2-week, 1, 3, 6, and 12-month follow-up visits when compared to preoperational values (P < 0.01). There were no cases of instability following the PCN procedure. There was no significant difference in stability either preoperatively or postoperatively (P > 0.05). Our findings confirm that PCN for the treatment of cervical disc herniation results in a good outcome without any tampering of the stability of the cervical spine. Hence, PCN as a procedure is safe, minimally invasive, less traumatic, requiring less time with an excellent clinical outcome. PCN should be performed for those patients who fail conservative medical management including medication, physical therapy, behavioral management, psychotherapy, and who are unwilling to undergo a more invasive technique such as spinal surgery.


Nucleoplasty Disc herniation coblation Cervical Discectomy 


  1. 1.
    Ascher PW (1986) Application of the laser in neurosurgery. Lasers Surg Med 2:91–97Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bailey RW, Badgley CE (1960) Stabilization of the cervical spine by anterior fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 42A:565–569Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Case RB, Choy DS, Altman P (1985) Intervertebral disc pressure as a function of fluid volume infused. J Clin Laser Med Surg 13:143–147Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castro WH, Halm H, Rondhuis J (1992) The influence of automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy (APLD) on the biomechanics of the lumbar intervertebral disc. An experimental study. Acta Orthop Belg 58:400–405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen YC, Lee SH, Chen D (2003) Intradiscal pressure study of percutaneous disc decompression with nucleoplasty in human cadavers. Spine 28(7):661–665. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200304010-00008 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen YC, Lee SH, Saenz Y et al (2003) Histologic findings of disc, end plate and neural elements after coblation of nucleus pulposus: an experimental nucleoplasty study. Spine J 3(6):466–470. doi: 10.1016/S1529-9430(03)00143-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cloward RB (1958) The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical discs. J Neurosurg 15:602–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ellenberg MR, Honet JC, Treanor WJ (1994) Cervical radiculopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75:342–352. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90040-X PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fukushima T, Ishijima B, Hirakawa K et al (1973) Ventriculofiberscope: a new technique for endoscopic diagnosis and operation. J Neurosurg 38:251–256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hijikata S (1989) Percutaneous nucleotomy. A new concept technique and 12 years’ experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 238:9–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hirsch D (1960) Cervical disc rupture: diagnosis and therapy. Acta Orthop Scand 30:172–176Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kahanovitz N, Viola K, Goldstein T et al (1990) A multicenter analysis of percutaneous discectomy. Spine J 15:713–715. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199007000-00017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee SH, Derby R, Chen Y et al (2004) In vitro measurement of pressure in intervertebral discs and annulus fi brosus with and without annular tears during discography. Spine J 4:614–618. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.03.021 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Macnab I (1971) Negative disc exploration: an analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in 68 patient. J Bone Jt Surg Br 53:891–903Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maroon JC (2002) Current concepts in minimally invasive discectomy. Neurosurgery 51:S137–S145. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200211002-00019 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mixter WJ, Barr JS (1934) Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med 211:210–215Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nau WH, Diederich CJ (2004) Evaluation of temperature distributions in cadaveric lumbar spine during nucleoplasty. Phys Med Biol 49(8):1583–1594. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/8/015 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    O’Neill CW, Kurgansky ME, Derby R et al (2002) Disc stimulation and patterns of referred pain. Spine J 27:2776–2781. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200212150-00007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Robertson YR (1973) Anterior removal of cervical disc without fusion. Clin Neurosurg 20:259–262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Robinson RA, Smith GW (1955) Anterolateral cervical disc removal and interbody fusion for cervical disc syndrome. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 96:223–224Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith L (1964) Enzyme dissolution of the nucleus pulposus in humans. JAMA 187:137–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Smith L, Garvin PJ, Jennings RB et al (1963) Enzyme dissolution of the nucleus pulposus. Nature 198:131–132Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stookey B (1928) Compression of the spinal cord due to ventral extradural cervical chondromas. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 20:275–278Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Orthopedic DepartmentThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical CollegeGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.The Spinal Column Mini-Trauma Cure CenterPeking Zhongguancun HospitalBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations