Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 17, Issue 8, pp 1035–1041 | Cite as

Spinal meningiomas: critical review of 131 surgically treated patients

  • I. Erol SandalciogluEmail author
  • Anja Hunold
  • Oliver Müller
  • Hischam Bassiouni
  • Dietmar Stolke
  • Siamak Asgari
Original Article

Abstract

This study was undertaken to analyze the functional outcome of surgically treated spinal meningiomas and to determine factors for surgical morbidity. Between January 1990 and December 2006 a total of 131 patients underwent surgical resection of a spinal menigioma. There were 114 (87%) female and 17 (13%) male patients. Age ranged from 17 to 88 years (mean 69 years). The mean follow-up period was 61 months (range 1–116 months) including a complete neurological examination and postoperative MRI studies. The pre- and postoperative neurological state was graded according to the Frankel Scale. Surgery was performed under standard microsurgical conditions with neurophysiological monitoring. In 73% the lesion was located in the thoracic region, in 16% in the cervical region, in 5% at the cervico-thoracic junction, in 4.5% at the thoraco-lumbar junction and in 1.5% in the lumbar region. Surgical resection was complete in 127 patients (97%) and incomplete in 4 patients (3%). At the last follow-up the neurological state was improved or unchanged in 126 patients (96.2%) and worse in 4 patients (3%). Permanent operative morbidity and mortality rates were 3 and 0.8%, respectively. Extensive tumour calcification proved to be a significant factor for surgical morbidity (P < 0.0001). Radical resection of spinal meningiomas can be performed with good functional results. Extensive tumor calcification, especially in elderly patients proved to harbor an increased risk for surgical morbidity.

Keywords

Spinal meningioma Outcome Spinal tumours Surgery Meningioma 

References

  1. 1.
    Bret P, Lecuire J, Lapras C, Deruty R, Dechaume JP, Assaad A (1976) Intraspinal meningiomas. A series of 60 cases. Neurochirurgie 22:5–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohen-Gadol AA, Zikel OM, Koch CA, Scheithauer BW, Krauss WE (2003) Spinal meningiomas in patients younger than 50 years of age: a 21-year experience. J Neurosurg 98:258–263PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frankel HL, Hancock DO, Hyslop G, Melzak J, Michaelis LS, Ungar GH, Vernon JD, Walsh JJ (1969) The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. I. Paraplegia 7:179–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gezen F, Kahraman S, Canakci Z, Beduk A (2000) Review of 36 cases of spinal cord meningioma. Spine 25:727–731CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gottfried ON, Gluf W, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Kan P, Schmidt MH (2003) Spinal meningiomas: surgical management and outcome. Neurosurg Focus 14:e2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    King AT, Sharr MM, Gullan RW, Bartlett JR (1998) Spinal meningiomas: a 20-year review. Br J Neurosurg 12:521–526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klekamp J, Samii M (1999) Surgical results for spinal meningiomas. Surg Neurol 52:552–562CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Levy WJ Jr, Bay J, Dohn D (1982) Spinal cord meningioma. J Neurosurg 57:804–812CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mirimanoff RO, Dosoretz DE, Linggood RM, Ojemann RG, Martuza RL (1985) Meningioma: analysis of recurrence and progression following neurosurgical resection. J Neurosurg 62:18–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morandi X, Haegelen C, Riffaud L, Amlashi S, Adn M, Brassier G (2004) Results in the operative treatment of elderly patients with spinal meningiomas. Spine 29:2191–2194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mulholland RC (1996) Sir William Gowers 1845–1915. Spine 21:1106–1110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pena M, Galasko CS, Barrie JL (1992) Delay in diagnosis of intradural spinal tumors. Spine 17:1110–1116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roux FX, Nataf F, Pinaudeau M, Borne G, Devaux B, Meder JF (1996) Intraspinal meningiomas: review of 54 cases with discussion of poor prognosis factors and modern therapeutic management. Surg Neurol 46:458–463; discussion 463–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sandalcioglu IE, Wiedemayer H, Secer S, Asgari S, Stolke D (2002) Surgical removal of brain stem cavernous malformations: surgical indications, technical considerations, and results. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 72:351–355CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schaller B (2005) Spinal meningioma: relationship between histological subtypes and surgical outcome? J Neurooncol 75:157–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schroth G, Thron A, Guhl L, Voigt K, Niendorf HP, Garces LR (1987) Magnetic resonance imaging of spinal meningiomas and neurinomas. Improvement of imaging by paramagnetic contrast enhancement. J Neurosurg 66:695–700CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simpson D (1957) The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 20:22–39CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Solero CL, Fornari M, Giombini S, Lasio G, Oliveri G, Cimino C, Pluchino F (1989) Spinal meningiomas: review of 174 operated cases. Neurosurgery 25:153–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weil SM, Gewirtz RJ, Tew JM Jr (1990) Concurrent intradural and extradural meningiomas of the cervical spine. Neurosurgery 27:629–631CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wiedemayer H, Fauser B, Sandalcioglu IE, Schafer H, Stolke D (2002) The impact of neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring on surgical decisions: a critical analysis of 423 cases. J Neurosurg 96:255–262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wiedemayer H, Sandalcioglu IE, Aalders M, Wiedemayer H, Floerke M, Stolke D (2004) Reconstruction of the laminar roof with miniplates for a posterior approach in intraspinal surgery: technical considerations and critical evaluation of follow-up results. Spine 29:E333–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wiedemayer H, Sandalcioglu IE, Armbruster W, Regel J, Schaefer H, Stolke D (2004) False negative findings in intraoperative SEP monitoring: analysis of 658 consecutive neurosurgical cases and review of published reports. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:280–286PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Erol Sandalcioglu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anja Hunold
    • 1
  • Oliver Müller
    • 1
  • Hischam Bassiouni
    • 1
  • Dietmar Stolke
    • 1
  • Siamak Asgari
    • 1
  1. 1.Neurochirurgische KlinikUniversitätsklinikum EssenEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations