European Spine Journal

, Volume 17, Issue 7, pp 970–974 | Cite as

Incidence and management of pulmonary embolism following spinal surgery occurring while under chemical thromboprophylaxis

  • C. SchizasEmail author
  • F. Neumayer
  • V. Kosmopoulos
Original Article


Patients undergoing spinal surgery are at risk of developing thromboembolic complications even though lower incidences have been reported as compared to joint arthroplasty surgery. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has been studied extensively in the context of spinal surgery but symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) has engaged less attention. We prospectively followed a consecutive cohort of 270 patients undergoing spinal surgery at a single institution. From these patients, only 26 were simple discectomies, while the largest proportion (226) was fusions. All patients received both low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) initiated after surgery and compressive stockings. PE was diagnosed with spiral chest CT. Six patients developed symptomatic PE, five during their hospital stay. In three of the six patients the embolic event occurred during the first 3 postoperative days. They were managed by the temporary insertion of an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter thus allowing for a delay in full-dose anticoagulation until removal of the filter. None of the PE patients suffered any bleeding complication as a result of the introduction of full anticoagulation. Two patients suffered postoperative haematomas, without development of neurological symptoms or signs, requiring emergency evacuation. The overall incidence of PE was 2.2% rising to 2.5% after exclusion of microdiscectomy cases. The incidence of PE was highest in anterior or combined thoracolumbar/lumbar procedures (4.2%). There is a large variation in the reported incidence of PE in the spinal literature. Results from the only study found in the literature specifically monitoring PE suggest an incidence of PE as high as 2.5%. Our study shows a similar incidence despite the use of LMWH. In the absence of randomized controlled trials (RCT) it is uncertain if this type of prophylaxis lowers the incidence of PE. However, other studies show that the morbidity of LMWH is very low. Since PE can be a life-threatening complication, LMWH may be a worthwhile option to consider for prophylaxis. RCTs are necessary in assessing the efficacy of DVT and PE prophylaxis in spinal patients.


Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Spinal surgery Incidence Low molecular weight heparin 


  1. 1.
    Becker DM, Philbrick JT, Selby JB (1992) Inferior vena cava filters. Indications, safety, effectiveness (review). Arch Intern Med 152:1985–1994 (50 Refs)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cain JE Jr., Major MR, Lauerman WC, West JL, Wood KB, Fueredi GA (1995) The morbidity of heparin therapy after development of pulmonary embolus in patients undergoing thoracolumbar or lumbar spinal fusion. Spine 20:1600–1603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, Mackenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic co-morbidity in longitudinal-studies—development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dearborn JT, Hu SS, Tribus CB, Bradford DS (1999) Thromboembolic complications after major thoracolumbar spine surgery. Spine 24:1471–1476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ferree BA (1994) Deep venous thrombosis following lumbar laminotomy and laminectomy. Orthopedics 17:35–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Geerts WH, Heit JA, Clagett GP, Pineo GF, Colwell CW, Anderson FA Jr., Wheeler HB (2001) Prevention of venous thromboembolism (Review). Chest 119:132S–175S (630 Refs)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gerlach R, Raabe A, Beck J, Woszczyk A, Seifert V (2004) Postoperative nadroparin administration for prophylaxis of thromboembolic events is not associated with an increased risk of hemorrhage after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 13:9–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Laakso E, Ahovuo J, Rosenberg PH (1996) Blood flow in the lower limbs in the knee–chest position. Ultrasonographic study in unanaesthetised volunteers. Anaesthesia 51:1113–1116Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leon L, Rodriguez H, Tawk RG, Ondra SL, Labropoulos N, Morasch MD (2005) The prophylactic use of inferior vena cava filters in patients undergoing high-risk spinal surgery. Ann Vasc Surg 19:442–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lotke PA, Ecker ML, Alavi A, Berkowitz H (1984) Indications for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis following total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:202–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oda T, Fuji T, Kato Y, Fujita S, Kanemitsu N (2000) Deep venous thrombosis after posterior spinal surgery. Spine 25:2962–2967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rokito SE, Schwartz MC, Neuwirth MG (1996) Deep vein thrombosis after major reconstructive spinal surgery. Spine 21:853–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rosner MK, Kuklo TR, Tawk R, Moquin R, Ondra SL (2004) Prophylactic placement of an inferior vena cava filter in high-risk patients undergoing spinal reconstruction. Neurosurg Focus 17:E6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smith MD, Bressler EL, Lonstein JE, Winter R, Pinto MR, Denis F (1994) Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after major reconstructive operations on the spine. A prospective analysis of three hundred and seventeen patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:980–985Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    West JL III, Anderson LD (1992) Incidence of deep vein thrombosis in major adult spinal surgery. Spine 17:S254–S257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wood KB, Kos PB, Abnet JK, Ista C (1997) Prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after major spinal surgery: a comparison study of external devices. J Spinal Disord 10:209–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and The University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Hôpital Orthopédique de la Suisse RomandeLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations