Course and Prognostic Factors for Neck Pain in Whiplash-Associated Disorders (WAD)
- 335 Downloads
Best evidence synthesis.
To perform a best evidence synthesis on the course and prognostic factors for neck pain and its associated disorders in Grades I–III whiplash-associated disorders (WAD).
Summary of Background Data
Knowledge of the course of recovery of WAD guides expectations for recovery. Identifying prognostic factors assists in planning management and intervention strategies and effective compensation policies to decrease the burden of WAD.
The Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and its Associated Disorders (Neck Pain Task Force) conducted a critical review of the literature published between 1980 and 2006 to assemble the best evidence on neck pain and its associated disorders. Studies meeting criteria for scientific validity were included in a best evidence synthesis.
We found 226 articles related to course and prognostic factors in neck pain and its associated disorders. After a critical review, 70 (31%) were accepted on scientific merit; 47 of these studies related to course and prognostic factors in WAD. The evidence suggests that approximately 50% of those with WAD will report neck pain symptoms 1 year after their injuries. Greater initial pain, more symptoms, and greater initial disability predicted slower recovery. Few factors related to the collision itself (for example, direction of the collision, headrest type) were prognostic; however, postinjury psychological factors such as passive coping style, depressed mood, and fear of movement were prognostic for slower or less complete recovery. There is also preliminary evidence that the prevailing compensation system is prognostic for recovery in WAD.
The Neck Pain Task Force undertook a best evidence synthesis to establish a baseline of the current best evidence on the course and prognosis for WAD. Recovery of WAD seems to be multifactorial.
Key wordsneck pain systematic review epidemiology prognosis whiplash
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 10.Slavin RE. (1986) Best evidence synthesis: an alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews. Educ Res 15:5–11Google Scholar
- 16.World Health Organization. International Classification of Function, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001.Google Scholar
- 25.Holm L, Cassidy JD, Sjogren Y, et al. (1999) Impairment and work disability due to whiplash injury following traffic collisions. An analysis of insurance material from the Swedish Road Traffic Injury Commission. Scand J Public Health 27:116–23Google Scholar
- 36.Suissa S, Harder S, Veilleux M. (1995) The Quebec whiplash-associated disorders cohort study. Spine 20:12S–20SGoogle Scholar