European Spine Journal

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 585–591 | Cite as

Evaluation of morbidity, mortality and outcome following cervical spine injuries in elderly patients

  • S. A. MalikEmail author
  • M. Murphy
  • P. Connolly
  • J. O’Byrne
Original Article


We analysed the morbidity, mortality and outcome of cervical spine injuries in patients over the age of 65 years. This study was a retrospective review of 107 elderly patients admitted to our tertiary referral spinal injuries unit with cervical spine injuries between 1994 and 2002. The data was acquired by analysis of the national spinal unit database, hospital inpatient enquiry system, chart and radiographic review. Mean age was 74 years (range 66–93 years). The male to female ratio was 2.1:1 (M = 72, F = 35). The mean follow-up was 4.4 years (1–9 years) and mean in-hospital stay was 10 days (2–90 days). The mechanism of injury was a fall in 75 and road traffic accident in the remaining 32 patients. The level involved was atlanto-axial in 44 cases, sub-axial in 52 cases and the remaining 11 had no bony injury. Multilevel involvement occurred in 48 patients. C2 dominated the single level injury and most of them were type II odontoid fractures. Four patients had complete neurology, 27 had incomplete neurology, and the remaining 76 had no neurological deficit. Treatment included cervical orthosis in 67 cases, halo immobilization in 25, posterior stabilization in 12 patients and anterior cervical fusion in three patients. The overall complication rate was 18.6% with an associated in-hospital mortality of 11.2%. The complications included loss of reduction due to halo and Minerva loosening, non-union and delayed union among conservatively treated patients, pin site and wound infection, gastrointestinal bleeding and complication due to associated injuries. Among the 28.9% patients with neurological involvement, 37.7% had significant neurological recovery. Outcome was assessed using a cervical spine outcome questionnaire from Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. Sixty-seven patients (70%) completed the form, 20 patients (19%) were deceased at review and 8 patients (7%) were uncontactable. Functional disability was more marked in the patients with neurologically deficit at time of injury. Outcome of the injury was related to increasing age, co-morbidity and the severity of neurological deficit. Injuries of the cervical spine are not infrequent occurrence in the elderly and occur with relatively minor trauma. Neck pain in the elderly patients should be thoroughly evaluated to exclude C2 injuries. Most patients can be managed in an orthosis but unstable injuries require rigid external immobilization or surgical stabilization.


Elderly Cervical spine injury External immobilization Outcome 


  1. 1.
    Anderson LD, D’Alonso RT (1974) Fracture of the odontoid process of the atlas. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 56:1663–1674Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akmal M, Trivedi R, Sutcliffe J (2003) Functional outcome in trauma patients with spinal injury. Spine 28(2):180–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bednar DA, Parikh J, Hummel J (1995) Management of type11 odontoid process fractures in geriatric patient: a prospective study of sequential cohorts with attention to survivorship. J Spinal Disord 8:166–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brohi K, Macdonald JW (2000) Evaluation of unstable cervical spine injury; a 6-year experience. J Trauma 49:76–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Banit DM, Grau G, Fisher JR (2000) Evaluvation of the acute cervical spine: a management algorithm. J Trauma 49:450–456PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    BenDebba M, Heller J (2002) Cervical spine outcomes questionnaire; its development and psychometric properties. Spine 27/19:2116–2123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brolin K (2003) Neck injuries among the elderly in Sweden. Inj Control Saf Promot 10(3):155–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hanigan WC, Powel FC, Elwood PW, Henderson JP (1977) Odontoid fractures in cervical orthosis; a study comparing their effectiveness in restricting cervical motion in normal subjects. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 59A:332–339Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnson RM, Hart DL, Simmons EF, Ramsby GR, Southwick WO (1977) Cervical orthosis; a study comparing their effectiveness in restricting cervical motion in normal subjects. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 59A:332–339Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lomoschitz FM, Blackmore CC, Mirza SK, Mann FA (2002) Cervical spine injuries in patients 65 years old and older. AJR 178:573–577PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Olerud C, Andersson S, Svensson B, Bring J (1999) Cervical spine fractures in the elderly, factors influencing survival in 65 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 70(5):509–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pepin JW, Bourne RB, Hawkins RJ (1985) Odontoid fractures, with special reference to the elderly patient. Clin Orthop 193:178–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ryan MD, Henderson JJ (1992) The epidemiology of fractures and fracture-dislocation of the cervical spine. Injury 23(1):38–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ryan MD, Taylor TK (1993) Odontoid fracture in the elderly. J Spinal Disord 6(5):379–401Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sonntag VKH, Hadley MN (1991) Management of upper cervical spinal instability. Neurosurg Update 11:222–233Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Spivak JM, Weiss MA, Cotler JM (1994) Cervical spine injuries in patients 65 and older. Spine 19:2302–2306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seybold EA, Bayley JC (1998) Functional outcome of surgery and conservatively managed dens fracture. Spine 27(17):1837–1845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weller SJ, Malek AM, Rossitch E (1997) Cervical spine fracture in the elderly. Surg Neurol 47:274–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. A. Malik
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Murphy
    • 1
  • P. Connolly
    • 1
  • J. O’Byrne
    • 1
  1. 1.National Spinal Injury UnitMater Misericordiae HospitalDublin 2Ireland

Personalised recommendations