European Spine Journal

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 785–790 | Cite as

Spine surgeons: spine industry

Letter to the Editor
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Keywords

Academic Medical Center Medical Society Priority Score Vertebral Augmentation Scientific Advisory Board 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Brand RA, Buckwalter JA, Talman CL, Happe DG (2003) Industrial support of orthopaedic research in the academic setting. Clin Orthop 412:45–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Johnston SE (2000) Professionalism and medicine’s social contract. J Bone Joint Surg 82:1189–1194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crowninshield R (2003) The orthopaedic profession and industry; conflict or convergence of interests. Clin Orthop 412:8–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Crowninshield R (2005) The orthopaedic profession and the orthopaedic industry: partners in quality patient care. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:164Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    DeAngelis CD (2000) Conflict of interest and the public trust. JAMA 284(17):237–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    DelSignore JL (2003) Current guidelines regarding industry-sponsored continuing medical education. Clin Orthop 412:21–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Epps CH (2003) Ethical guidelines for orthopaedists and industry. Clin Orthop 412:14–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leopold SS, Warme WJ, Braunlich EF, Shott S (2003) Association between funding source and study outcome in orthopaedic research. Clin Orthop 415:293–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lim E, Aquino NJ (1999) The orthopaedic surgeon and manufacturing industry relationship: ethical guidelines. Clin Orthop 368:279–286PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lubahn JD, Mankin CJ, Mankin HJ, Kuhn PJ (2000) Orthopaedics, ethics, and industry: appropriateness of gifts, grants, and awards. Clin Orthop 371:256–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sarmiento A (2003) The relationship between orthopaedics and industry must be reformed. Clin Orthop 412:38–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saroff D (2005) Objectivity and worldly wisdom: missing ingredients in orthopaedic training and practice. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:166Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shah RV, Albert TJ, Bruegel-Sanchez V, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS, Grauer JN (2005) Industry support and correlation to study outcome for papers published in spine. Spine 30(9):1099–1104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wenger NS, Lieberman JR (2000) The orthopaedic surgeon and industry: ethics and industry incentives. Clin Orthop 378:39–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wieting MW, Mevis H, Zuckerman JD (2003) The role of industry in internet education. Clin Orthop 412:28–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilson FS (2003) Continuing medical education: ethical collaboration between sponsor and industry. Clin Orthop 412:33–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wurth GR, Sherr JH, Coffman TM (2003) Orthopaedic research and education foundation industry. Clin Orthop 412:54–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUCSDSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations