Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 240–249 | Cite as

Pain and disability correlated with disc degeneration via magnetic resonance imaging in scoliosis patients

  • Glenn R. Buttermann
  • William J. Mullin
Original Article

Abstract

Prior imaging studies of scoliosis patients attempted to demonstrate a relationship between plain radiographic curve patterns and curve progression and pain, or used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to focus on spinal cord abnormalities. Pain in scoliosis patients may differ from nondeformity patients, yet may still be discogenic. The purpose of this study was to assess the possible relationship of degenerative disc findings on MRI to scoliosis patients’ pain. This prospective study enrolled scoliosis and control patients, all of whom had assessment for back pain (visual analog scale) and disability (Oswestry Index) and spinal MRI to identify prevalence and distribution of degenerative disc findings. Specifically, we assessed 60 consecutive pediatric and adult idiopathic scoliosis patients who had progressed to surgical treatment, 60 age- and gender-matched asymptomatic controls, and 172 nondeformity symptomatic degenerative disc disease patients who had progressed to surgical treatment. All subjects had independent analysis of their preoperative MRI for disc degeneration, disc herniation, Schmorl’s nodes, and inflammatory end plate changes. Imaging findings of the scoliosis patients were compared to those from asymptomatic and symptomatic control groups. Our results found that both pediatric and adult scoliosis patients had significantly more pain and disability than did asymptomatic controls (P < 0.001). The adult idiopathic scoliosis patients had pain and disability similar to those of surgical degenerative disc disease control groups. Disc degeneration and herniation (contained) were not related to pain. However, in the pediatric scoliosis patients, those with Schmorl’s nodes often had greater pain than those without (P = 0.01). Adults with painful scoliosis, typically occurring at the apex of the scoliosis or at the lumbosacral junction, had a significantly higher frequency of inflammatory end plate changes on MRI than did controls (P < 0.001). Prior studies have demonstrated a correlation of inflammatory end plate changes to lumbar discogenic pain. In conclusions, scoliosis patients who have progressed to surgical intervention, pediatric patients have varying degrees of pain, and those with Schmorl’s nodes may be at greater risk for pain. Adult scoliosis patients have multifactorial pain of which one component may be related to degeneration of the lower lumbar discs similar to that in nondeformity patients. Additionally, adult scoliosis patients may have MRI findings consistent with discogenic pain at the apex of their curvature, most commonly at the proximal lumbar levels.

Keywords

Disc degeneration Endplate changes Modic MRI Schmorl’s nodes Scoliosis 

References

  1. Antonacci MD, Mody DR, Heggeness MH (1998) Innervation of the human vertebral body: a histologic study. J Spinal Disord 11:526–531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D, Manna B (2004) The influence of spine and trunk deformity on preoperative idiopathic scoliosis patients health-related quality of life questionnaire responses. Spine 29(8):861–868PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balague F, Skovron ML, Nordin M et al (1995) Low back pain in schoolchildren. a study of familial and psychological factors. Spine 20(11):1265–1270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Balderston RA, Albert TJ, McIntosh T, Wong L, Dolinskas C (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of lumbar disc changes below scoliosis fusions. A prospective study. Spine 23(1):54–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Battie MC, Videman T (2004) Parent E. lumbar disc degeneration: epidemiology and genetic influences. Spine 29(23):2679–2690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berven S, Deviren V, Demir-Deviren S et al (2003) Studies in the modified scoliosis research society outcomes instrument in adults: validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity. Spine 28(18):2164–2619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Briard JL, Jegou D, Cauchiox J (1979) Adult lumbar scoliosis. Spine 4:526–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bridwell KH, Cats-Baril W, Harrast J et al (2005) The validity of the SRS-22 instrument in an adult spinal deformity population compared with the Oswestry and SF-12: a study of response distribution, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and reliability. Spine 30(4):455–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown MF, Hukkanen MVI, McCarthy ID et al (1997) Sensory and sympathetic innervation of the vertebral endplate in patients with degenerative disc disease. J Bone Joint Surg 79B:147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burton AK, Clarke RD, McClune TD, Tillotson KM (1996) The natural history of low back pain in adolescents. Spine 21(20):2323–2328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buttermann G (2004) The effect of spinal steroid injections for degenerative disc disease. Spine J 4(5):495–505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Court C, Colliou OK, Chin JR et al (2001) The effect of static in vivo bending on the murine intervertebral disc. Spine 1(4):239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crean JK, Roberts S, Jaffray DC et al (1997) Matrix metalloproteinases in the human intervertebral disc: role in disc degeneration and scoliosis. Spine 22(24):2877–2884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL (2003) Back pain and function 22 years after brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case–control study, part I. Spine 28(18):2078–2085PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davids JR, Chamberlin E, Blackhurst DW (2004) Indications for magnetic resonance imaging in presumed adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86A(10):2187–2195Google Scholar
  16. Deviren V, Smith JA, Berven SH et al (2002) Treatment of thoracolumbar scoliosis with anterior instrumentation: adults versus adolescents. In: Proceedings of the sixty-ninth annual meeting, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Dallas, TX, 13–17 February 2002Google Scholar
  17. Elfering A, Semmer N, Birkhofer D et al (2002) Risk factors for lumbar disc degeneration: a 5-year prospective MRI study in asymptomatic individuals. Spine 27(2):125–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fagan A, Moore R, Vernon Roberts B, Blumbergs P, Fraser R (2003) The innervation of the intervertebral disc: a quantitative analysis. Spine 28(23):2570–2576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB, Van Poortvliet JA, Phillips H (1984) Influence of anthropometric factors and joint laxity in the incidence of adolescent back pain. Spine 9(5):461–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fayad F, Lefevre-Colau MM, Rannou F, Quintero N, Nys A, Mace Y, Poiraudeau S, Drape JL, Revel M (2007) Relation of inflammatory modic changes to intradiscal steroid injection outcome in chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J. Jan 10 EPubGoogle Scholar
  21. Fras C, Kravitz P, Mody DR, Heggeness MH (2003) Substance P-containing nerves within the human vertebral body: an immunohistochemical study of the basivertebral nerve. Spine 3:63–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freemont AJ, Peacock TE, Goupille P et al (1997) Nerve ingrowth into diseased intervertebral disc in chronic back pain. Lancet 350:178–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar JR (2005) Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine 30(6):682–688PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamanishi C, Kawabata T, Yosii T, Tanaka S (1994) Schmorl’s nodes on magnetic resonance imaging. Their incidence and clinical relevance. Spine 19(4):450–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hsu K, Zucherman JF, Derby R et al (1988) Painful lumbar endplate disruptions: a significant discographic finding. Spine 13:76–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Inoue M, Minami S, Nakata Y et al (2005) Preoperative MRI analysis of patients with idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study. Spine 30(1):108–114PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jackson HC II, Winkelmann RK, Bickel WH (1966) Nerve endings in the human lumbar spinal column and related structures. J Bone Joint Surg 48A(7):1272–1281Google Scholar
  28. Jones A, Clarke A, Freeman BJ et al (2005) The Modic classification: inter- and intraobserver error in clinical practice. Spine 30(16):1867–1869PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS, Winter RB (1983) The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65(9):1302–1313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kjaer P, Leboeuf-Yde C, Sorensen JS, Bendix T (2005) An epidemiologic study of MRI and low back pain in 13-year-old children. Spine 30(7):798–806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kjaer P, Leboeuf-Yde C, Korsholm L et al (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging and low back pain in adults: a diagnostic imaging study of 40-year-old men and women. Spine 30(10):1173–1180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kjaer P, Korsholm L, Bendix T, Sorensen JS, Leboeuf-Yde C (2006) Modic changes and their associations with clinical findings. Eur Spine J 15(9):1312–1319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kostuik JP, Bentivoglio J (1981) The incidence of low-back pain in adult scoliosis. Spine 6(3):268–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leboeuf-Yde C, Kyvik KO (1998) At what age does low back pain become a common problem? A study of 29,424 individuals aged 12–41 years. Spine 23(2):228–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lerman JA, Sullivan E, Haynes RJ (2002) The pediatric outcomes data collection instrument (PODCI) and functional assessment in patients with adolescent or juvenile idiopathic scoliosis and congenital scoliosis or kyphosis. Spine 27(18):2052–2058PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lonstein J (1987) Patient evaluation. In: Bradford DS, Lonstein JE, Moe JH et al (eds) Moe’s textbook of scoliosis and other spinal deformities, edn 2. WB Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  37. Mayo NE, Goldberg MS, Poitras B et al (1994) The Ste-Justine adolescent idiopathic scoliosis cohort study: part 3. Back pain. Spine 19(14):1573–1581PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Melrose J, Gurr KR, Cole TC et al( 1991) The influence of scoliosis and aging on proteoglycan heterogeneity in the human intervertebral disc. J Orthop Res 9(1):68–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mente PL, Stokes IAF, Spence H, Aronsson DD (1997) Progression of vertebral wedging in an asymmetrically loaded rat tail model. Spine 22:1292–1296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Merola AA, Haher TR, Brkaric M et al (2002) A multicenter study of the outcomes of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the scoliosis research society (SRS) outcome instrument. Spine 27:2046–2051PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mierau D, Cassidy JD, Yong-Hing K (1989) Low-back pain and straight leg raising in children and adolescents. Spine 14(5):526–528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mitra D, Cassar-Pullicino VN, McCall IW (2004) Longitudinal study of vertebral type-1 end-plate changes on MR of the lumbar spine. Eur Radiol 14(9):1574–1581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Modic MT, Steinberg PM, Ross JS et al (1988) Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology 166:193–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Niv D, Gofeld M, Devor M (.2003) Causes of pain in degenerative bone and joint disease: a lesson from vertebroplasty. Pain 105(3):387–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ohnmeiss DD, Gatchel, RJ, eds (2001) North American Spine Society compendium of outcome instruments for assessment and research of spinal disorders. North American Spine Society, La GrangeGoogle Scholar
  46. Olsen TL, Anderson RL, Dearwater SR et al (1992) The epidemiology of low back pain in an adolescent population. Am J Public Health 82(4):606–608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Perennou D, Marcelli C, Herisson C, Simon L (1994) Adult lumbar scoliosis: epidemiologic aspects in a low-back pain population. Spine 19(2):123–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pratt RK, Burwell RG, Cole AA, Webb JK (2002) Patient and parental perception of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis before and after surgery in comparison with surface and radiographic measurements. Spine 27(14):1543–1552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rajwani T, Bagnall KM et al (2004) Using magnetic resonance imaging to characterize pedicle asymmetry in both normal patients and patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 29(7):E145–E152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ramirez N, Johnston CE, Browne RH (1997) The prevalence of back pain in children who have idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79(3):364–368PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Salminen JJ, Erkintalo M, Laine M, Pentti J (1995) Low back pain in the young. a prospective three-year follow-up study of subjects with and without low back pain. Spine 20(19):2101–2107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schenk P, Laubli T, Hodler J, Klipstein A (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine: findings in female subjects from administrative and nursing professions. Spine 31(23):2701–2706PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schwab FJ, Smith VA, Biserni M et al (2002) Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis. Spine 27(4):387–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schwab F, Dubey A, Pagala M et al (2003) Adult scoliosis: a health assessment analysis by SF-36. Spine 28(6):602–606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schwab F, el-Fegoun AB, Gamez L, Goodman H, Farcy JP (2005) A lumbar classification of scoliosis in the adult patient: preliminary approach. Spine 30(14):1670–1673PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shapiro GS, Taira G, Boachie-Adjei O (2003) Results of surgical treatment of adult idiopathic scoliosis with low back pain and spinal stenosis. Spine 28(4):358–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sjolie AN, Ljunggren AE (2001) The significance of high lumbar mobility and low lumbar strength for current and future low back pain in adolescents. Spine 26(23):2629–2636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Taimela S, Kujala UM, Salminen JJ, Viljanen T (1997) The prevalence of low back pain among children and adolescents. a nationwide, cohort-based questionnaire survey in Finland. Spine 22(10):1132–1136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Takahashi S, Delecrin J, Passuti N (2002) Surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in adults: an age-related analysis of outcome. Spine 27(16):1742–1748PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tertti MO, Salminen JJ, Paajanen HE et al (1991) Low-back pain and disk degeneration in children: a case–control MR imaging study. Radiology 180(2):503–507PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Toyone T, Takahashi K, Kitahara H et al (1994) Vertebral bone-marrow changes in degenerative lumbar disc disease. J Bone Joint Surg 76B:757–763Google Scholar
  62. Turner PG, Green JH, Galasko CS (1989) Back pain in childhood. Spine 14:812–814PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. van Dieen JH, Weinans H, Toussaint HM (1999) Fractures of the lumbar vertebral endplate in the etiology of low back pain: a hypothesis on the causative role of spinal compression in aspecific low back pain. Med Hypotheses 53:242–252Google Scholar
  64. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Spratt KF et al (2003) Health and function of patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis: a 50-year natural history study. JAMA 289(5):559–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (1998) MR imaging of the lumbar spine: prevalence of intervertebral disk extrusion and sequestration, nerve root compression, endplate abnormalities, and osteoarthritis of the facet joints in asymptomatic volunteers. Radiology 209(3):661–666PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J et al (2001) Painful lumbar disk derangement: relevance of endplate abnormalities at MR imaging. Radiology 218(2):420–427PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Denis F (1988) Pain patterns in adult scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 19(2):339–345PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Wood KB, Garvey TA, Gundry C, Heitoff KB (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging of the thoracic spine: evaluation of asymptomatic individuals. J Bone Joint Surg 77(11):1631–1638PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Wood KB, Schellhaus KP, Garvey TA, Asppli D (1999) Thoracic discography in healthy individuals: a controlled prospective study of magnetic resonance imaging and discography in asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. Spine 24(15):1548–1555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Midwest Spine InstituteStillwaterUSA
  2. 2.Center for Diagnostic ImagingMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations