European Spine Journal

, Volume 17, Issue 8, pp 1012–1018 | Cite as

Radiographic evaluation of selective anterior thoracolumbar or lumbar fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

  • Ting WangEmail author
  • Bingfang Zeng
  • Jianguang Xu
  • Hua Chen
  • Tao Zhang
  • Wei Zhou
  • Weiqing Kong
  • Yishan Fu
Original Article


According to Lenke classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), patients with type 5 curve in which the structural major curve is thoracolumbar or lumbar curve with nonstructural proximal thoracic and main thoracic curves, could be surgically treated with selective anterior thoracolumbar or lumbar (TL/L) fusion. This study retrospectively analyzed the radiographies of selective anterior TL/L fusion in 35 cases of AIS with Lenke type 5 curve. Segmental fixation with a single rigid rod through anterior thoracoabdominal approach was applied in all patients. Measurements of scoliosis curve in preoperative, immediate postoperative and follow-up radiographies were analyzed. The average follow up time was 36 months (24–42 months). The average preoperative Cobb angle of the TL/L curve was 45.6° and improved into 9.7° immediate postoperatively, with 79.7% curve correction. In addition, the minor thoracic curve decreased from 29.7° preoperatively to 17.6° postoperatively, with a spontaneous correction of 41.5%. During the follow-up, a loss of 4.6° correction was found and the average Cobb angle of TL/L increased to 14.4°. Also, the minor thoracic curve increased to average 20.1° with a loss of 2.4° correction. Trunk shift deteriorated slightly immediate postoperatively and improved at the follow-up. The lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) tilt was improved significantly and maintained its results at the follow-up. During the follow-up, the coronal disc angle immediately above the upper instrumented vertebra (UIVDA) and below the LIV (LIVDA) aggravated, while the sagittal contours of T5–T12 and T10–L2 were well maintained. The lumbar lordosis of L1–S1 and the sagittal Cobb angle of the instrumented segments were reduced slightly postoperatively and at the follow-up. There were no major complications or pseudarthrosis. The outcomes of this study show that selective anterior thoracolumbar or lumbar fusion with solid rod instrumentation is effective for surgical correction of AIS with Lenke type 5 curve. The TL/L curve, minor thoracic curve, and LIV title can be improved significantly, with good maintenance of sagittal contour. However, the UIVDA and LIVDA aggravate postoperatively when the trunk rebalances itself during follow-up. The degeneration of LIV disc warrants longer-term follow-up.


Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Selective fusion Anterior spinal fusion Thoracolumbar–lumbar scoliosis 


  1. 1.
    Bernstein RM, Hall JE (1998) Solid rod short segment anterior fusion in thoracolumbar scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop B 7:124–131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Horton WC, Holt RT, Johnson JR et al. (1988) Zielke instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis: late effects and minimizing complications. Spine 13:1145–1149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kalen V, Conklin M (1990) The behavior of the unfused lumbar curve following selective thoracic fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 15:271–274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaneda K, Fujiya N, Satoh S (1986) Results with Zielke instrumentation for idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Clin Orthop 205:195–203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaneda K, Shono Y, Satoh S et al. (1996) New anterior instrumentation for the management of the thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Application of the Kaneda two-rod system. Spine 21:1250–1262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Korovessis P (1987) Combined VDS and Harrington instrumentation for treatment of idiopathic double major curves. Spine 12:244–250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Large DF, Doig WG, Dickens DR et al. (1991) Surgical treatment of double major scoliosis. Improvement of the lumbar curve after fusion of the thoracic curve. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:121–124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lenke LG (2000) Selective anterior instrumentation of thoracolumbar/lumbar AIS. Presented at 7th international meeting on advanced spine techniques (IMAST) 6–8 July, Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lenke LG, Betz RR, Bridwell KH et al. (1999) Spontaneous lumbar curve coronal correction after selective anterior or posterior thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 24:1663–1671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J et al. (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1169–1181PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Baldus C et al. (1992) Preventing decompensation in King type II curves treated with Cotrel–Dubousset instrumentation. Strict guidelines for selective thoracic fusion. Spine 17:S274–S281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lowe TG, Peters JD (1993) Anterior spinal fusion with Zielke instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis. A frontal and sagittal curve analysis in 36 patients. Spine 18:423–426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Luk KD, Leong JC, Reyes L et al. (1989) The comparative results of treatment of idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis using the Harrington, Dwyer, and Zielke instrumentations. Spine 14:275–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McCance SE, Denis F, Lonstein JE et al. (1998) Coronal and sagittal balance in surgically treated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the King II curve pattern. A review of 67 consecutive cases having selective thoracic arthrodesis. Spine 23:2063–2073CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moe JH, Purcell GA, Bradford DS (1983) Zielke instrumentation (VDS) for the correction of spinal curvature. Analysis of results in 66 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 180:133–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moskowitz A, Trommanhauser S (1993) Surgical and clinical results of scoliosis surgery using Zielke instrumentation. Spine 18:2444–2451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ogiela DM, Chan DP (1986) Ventral derotation spondylodesis. A review of 22 cases. Spine 11:18–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ogilvie J (1988) Anterior spine fusion with Zielke instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescent. Orthop Clin of North Am 19:313–317Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Puno RM, An KC, Puno RL et al. (2003) Treatment recommendations for idiopathic scoliosis: an assessment of the Lenke classification. Spine 28:2102–2114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Richards BS (1992) Lumbar curve response in type II idiopathic scoliosis after posterior instrumentation of the thoracic curve. Spine 17:S282–S286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sanders AE, Baumann R, Brown H et al. (2003) Selective anterior fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar curves in adolescents: when can the associated thoracic curve been left unfused? Spine 28:706–713PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Satake K, Lenke LG, Kim YJ et al. (2005) Analysis of the lowest instrumented vertebra following anterior spinal fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: can we predict postoperative disc wedging? Spine 30:418–426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sweet FA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH et al. (1999) Maintaining lumbar lordosis with anterior single solid-rod instrumentation in thoracolumbar and lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 24:1655–1662CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sweet FA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH et al. (2001) Prospective radiographic and clinical outcomes and complications of single solid rod instrumented anterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 26:1956–1965CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wojcik AS, Webb JK, Burwell RG (1990) An analysis of the effect of the Zielke operation on S-shaped curves in idiopathic scoliosis. A follow-up study revealing some skeletal and soft tissue factors involved in curve progression. Spine 15:816–821CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang J, Qiu G, Yang B et al. (2004) Anterior instrumentation and fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Chin J Orthop 24:281–285Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zielke K (1978) Derotation and fusion—anterior spinal instrumentation. Orthop Trans 2:270Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ting Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bingfang Zeng
    • 1
  • Jianguang Xu
    • 1
  • Hua Chen
    • 1
  • Tao Zhang
    • 1
  • Wei Zhou
    • 1
  • Weiqing Kong
    • 1
  • Yishan Fu
    • 1
  1. 1.Spine Section Department of OrthopaedicsSixth People’s Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations