Multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during 409 lumbosacral surgical procedures in 409 patients
- 192 Downloads
A prospective study on 409 patients who received multimodel intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during lumbosacral surgical procedures between March 2000 and December 2005 was carried out. The objective of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of MIOM techniques used to monitor conus medullaris, cauda equina and nerve root function during lumbosacral decompression surgery. MIOM has increasingly become important to monitor ascending and descending pathways, giving immediate feedback information regarding any neurological deficit during the decompression and stabilisation procedure in the lumbosacral region. Intraoperative spinal- and cortical-evoked potentials, combined with continuous EMG- and motor-evoked potentials of the muscles, were evaluated and compared with postoperative clinical neurological changes. A total of 409 consecutive patients with lumbosacral spinal stenosis with or without instability were monitored by MIOM during the entire surgical procedure. A total of 388 patients presented true-negative findings while two patients presented false negative and 1 patient false-positive findings. Eighteen patients presented true-positive findings where neurological deficit after the operation was intraoperatively predicted. Of the 18 true-positive findings, 12 patients recovered completely; however, 6 patients recovered only partially. The sensitivity of MIOM applied during decompression and fusion surgery of the lumbosacral region was calculated as 90%, and the specificity was calculated as 99.7%. On the basis of the results of this study, MIOM is an effective method of monitoring the conus medullaris, cauda equina and nerve root function during surgery at the lumbosacral junctions and might reduce postoperative surgical-related complications and therefore improve the long-term results.
KeywordsSpine surgery Lumbar spinal stenosis Intraoperative monitoring Sensitivity Specificity
Dr. Lote Medicus fund for the financial support of the development of MIOM at the Schulthess Clinic. Dave O’Riordan and Charles McCammon for helping with the manuscript. Anne Mannion, PhD, for the critical review of the manuscript. A special thanks to Professor Arnaldo Benini who supported the study with his patients.
Conflict of interest statement None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.
- 3.Brantigan JW, Steffee AD, Lewis ML, Quinn LM, Persenaire JM (2000) Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system: two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial. Spine 25:1437–1446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Sutter M, Eggspühler A, Grob D, Jeszenszky D, Porchet F, Muller A, Dvorak J (2007) The diagnostic value of multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during spine surgery: a prospective study of 1017 cases. Eur Spine J Jul 31; [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- 10.Sutter M, Eggspühler A, Muller A, Dvorak J (2007) Multimodal intraoperative monitoring: methodology. Eur Spine J Jul 26; [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- 11.Thomsen K, Christensen FB, Eiskjaer SP, Hansen ES, Fruensgaard S, Bunger CE (1997) 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies: the effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Spine 22:2813–2822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Winkler T, Sharma H, Stalberg E (1998) Spinal cord bioelectric activity, edema and cell injury following a focal trauma to the rat spinal cord: an experimental study using pharmacological and morphological approaches. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar