Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 16, Issue 7, pp 977–982 | Cite as

Modic changes following lumbar disc herniation

  • Hanne B. AlbertEmail author
  • Claus Manniche
Original Article

Abstract

Only a small proportion (20%) of patients with LBP can be diagnosed based on a patho-anatomical entity. Therefore, the identification of relevant subgroups, preferably on a patoanatomical basis, is strongly needed. Modic changes have been described by several authors as being closely linked with LBP. The aims of this study were to describe the prevalence of Modic changes, their development as well as their association to LBP, previous disc contour, and surgery in patients with previous severe sciatica. This is a longitudinal cohort study where the patients were recruited from an RCT comparing two active conservative treatments, the 181 patients, who at baseline had radicular pain in or below the knee; all underwent a physical examination and MRI. MRI’s, pain history and physical examination of 166 patients were obtained at follow-up 14 months later. The prevalence of Modic changes type 1 increased from 9% at baseline to 29% at follow-up. At that time, a strong association between Modic changes and non-specific LBP was noted. Apparently, Modic changes type 1 was more strongly associated with non-specific lumbar pain than Modic changes type 2. The development of new Modic changes was closely related to the level of a previous disc herniation. A lumbar disc herniation is a strong risk factor for developing Modic changes (especially type 1) during the following year. Furthermore, Modic changes are strongly associated with LBP.

Keywords

Low back pain Modic changes MRI Disc herniation Vertebral endplates changes 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Alan Jordan PhD and Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde PhD for valuable editorial assistance.

References

  1. 1.
    Albert HB (2004) Conservative treatment of patients with sciatica—a randomized controlled trial. (Dissertation) Odense, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Babar S, Saifuddin A (2002) MRI of the Post-discectomy lumbar spine. Clin Radiol 57:969–981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS et al (1992) Post-operative diskitis: distinguishing early MR imaging findings from normal post-operative disc space changes. Radiology 184:765–771PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Crane R (1998) The post-operative lumbar spine. Acta Radiol Suppl 414:1–23Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fardon DF, Milette PC (2001) Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Spine 26:E93–E113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grand CM, Bank WO, Baleriaux D et al (1993) Gadolinium enhancement of vertebral endplate following lumbar disc surgery. Neurordiology 35:503–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kjaer P, Leboeuf-Yde C, Korsholm L et al (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging and low back pain in adults. A diagnostic imaging study of 40-year-old men and women. Spine 30:1173–1180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manniche C, Asmussen K, Lauritsen B et al (1994) Low back pain rating scale: validation of a tool for assessment of low back pain. Pain 57:317–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mitra D, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Mitra D et al (2004) Longitudinal study of vertebral type 1 end-plate changes on MR of the lumbar spine. Eur Radiol 14:1574–1581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Modic MT, Steinberg PM, Ross JS et al (1988) Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology 166:193–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, Ross JS et al (1988) Imaging of degenerative disk disease. Radiology 168:177–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Toyone T, Takahashi K, Kitahara H et al (1994) Vertebral bone-marrow changes in degenerative lumbar disc disease. An MRI study of 74 patients with low back pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:757–764PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Waddell G (1987) 1987 Volvo award in clinical sciences. A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine 12:632–644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J et al (2001) Painful lumbar disc derangement: relevance of endplate abnormalities at MR imaging. Radiology 218:420–427PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Back Research Center, Part of Clinical Locomotion ScienceUniversity of Southern DenmarkRingeDenmark

Personalised recommendations