Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 415–422 | Cite as

Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis

  • C. Boulay
  • C. Tardieu
  • J. Hecquet
  • C. Benaim
  • B. Mouilleseaux
  • C. Marty
  • D. Prat-Pradal
  • J. Legaye
  • G. Duval-Beaupère
  • J. Pélissier
Original Article

Abstract

Pelvis and spinal curves were studied with an angular parameter typical of pelvis morphology: pelvic incidence. A significant chain of correlations between positional pelvic and spinal parameters and incidence is known. This study investigated standards of incidence and a predictive equation of lordosis from selective pelvic and spinal individual parameters. One hundred and forty nine (78 men and 71 women) healthy adults, aged 19–50 years, with no spinal disorders, were included and had a full-spine lateral X-ray in a standardised upright position. Computerised technology was used for the measurement of angular parameters. Mean-deviation section of each parameter and Pearson correlation test were calculated. A multivariate selection algorithm was running with the lordosis (predicted variable) and the other spinal and pelvic parameters (predictor variables), to determine the best sets of predictors to include in the model. A low incidence (<44°) decreased sacral-slope and the lordosis is flattened. A high incidence (>62°) increased sacral-slope and the lordosis is more pronounced. Lordosis predictive equation is based on incidence, kyphosis, sacral-slope and ±T9 tilt. The confidence limits and the residuals (the difference between measured and predicted lordosis) assessed the predicted lordosis accuracy of the model: respectively, ±1.65 and 2.41° with the 4-item model; ±1.73 and 3.62° with the 3-item model. The ability of the functional spine-pelvis unit to search for a sagittal balance depended both on the incidence and on the variation section of the other positional parameters. Incidence gave an adaptation potential at two levels of positional compensation: overlying state (kyphosis, T9 tilt), underlying state (sacral slope, pelvic tilt). The biomechanical and clinical conditions of the standing posture (as in scoliosis, low back pain, spondylisthesis, spine surgery, obesity and postural impairments) can be studied by comparing the measured lordosis with the predicted lordosis.

Keywords

Pelvis Spine Spinal balance Lordosis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank some colleagues for their scientific contribution (C. Charbonnier, P. Fender, F. Montagnon, J. Sengler, MD) and their valuable advice (J. Dubousset, Ph D and MD). We would like to thank the Montpellier E.R.R.F. Association for their grant and contribution in the project.

References

  1. 1.
    Boisaubert B, Montigny JP, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C (1997) Incidence pelvienne, sacrum et spondylolisthésis. Rachis 9:187–192Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Bénaim C, Mitulescu A, Marty C, Prat-Pradal D, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Pelissier J (2005) Anatomical reliability of two fundamental radiological and clinical pelvic parameters: incidence and thickness. Accepted Eur J Orthop Surg TraumatolGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Curylo LJ, Edwards C, DeWald RW (2002) Radiographic markers in spondyloptosis: implications for spondylolisthesis progression. Spine 27:2021–2025CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Descamps H, Commare MC, Marty C, Duval-Beaupere G (1996) Le paramètre Incidence chez le petit enfant. Rachis 8:177–180Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Descamps H, Commare MC, Marty C, Hecquet J, Duval-Beaupere G (1999) Modifications des angles pelviens, dont l’Incidence pelvienne, au cours de la croissance humaine. Biom Hum et Anthropol 17:59–63Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    du Peloux J, Fauchet R, Faucon B, Stagnara P (1965) The plan of choice for the radiologic examination of kyphoscolioses. Rev Chir Orthop 51:517–524PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    During J, Goudfrooij H, Keessen W, Beeker TW, Crowe A (1985) Toward standards for posture. Postural characteristics of the lower back system in normal and pathologic conditions. Spine 10:83–87PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duval-Beaupere G, Legaye J (2004) Composante sagittale de la statique rachidienne. Rev Rhum 71:105–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Duval-Beaupere G, Schmidt C, Cosson P (1992) A Barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: the conditions required for an economic standing position. Ann Biomed Eng 20:451–462PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Farfan HF (1978) The biomechanical advantage of lordosis and hip extension for upright activity. Man as compared with other anthropoids. Spine 3:336–342PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Farfan HF (1995) Form and function of the musculoskeletal system as revealed by mathematical analysis of the lumbar spine. An essay. Spine 20:1462–1474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guigui P, Levassor N, Rillardon L, Wodecki P, Cardinne L (2003) Physiological value of pelvic and spinal parameters of sagittal balance: analysis of 250 healthy volunteers. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 89:496–506PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guillaumat M, Biot B, Chopin D, de Mauroy JC, Michel CR, Moe J, Salanova C, Stagnara P (1981) So-called idiopathic scolioses in the adult. Rev Chir Orthop 67(Suppl 2):1–44Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hanson DS, Bridwell KH, Rhee JM, Lenke LG (2002) Correlation of pelvic incidence with low-grade and high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine 27:2026–2029CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hecquet J (1992) Software rachis 91. In: Hecquet J (ed) Proceedings of the international symposium on 3-D scoliotic deformities. Montréal, pp 26–33Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Itoi E (1991) Roentgenographic analysis of posture in spinal osteoporotics. Spine 16:750–756PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jackson RP, Phipps T, Hales C, Surber J (2003) Pelvic lordosis and alignment in spondylolisthesis. Spine 28:151–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Legaye J, Hecquet J, Marty C, Duval-Beaupere G (1993) Equilibre sagittal du rachis. Relations entre bassin et courbures rachidiennes sagittales en position debout. Rachis 5:215–226Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7:99–103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mangione P, Gomez D, Senegas J (1997) Study of the course of the incidence angle during growth. Eur Spine J 6:163–167Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marty C, Boisaubert B, Descamps H, Montigny JP, Hecquet J, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G (2002) The sagittal anatomy of the sacrum among young adults, infants, and spondylolisthesis patients. Eur Spine J 11:119–125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2003) Geometrical and mechanical analysis of lumbar lordosis in an asymptomatic population: proposed classification. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 89:632–639PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stagnara P, De Mauroy JC, Dran G, Gonon GP, Costanzo G, Dimnet J, Pasquet A (1982) Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in a sagittal plane: approach to references for the evaluation of kyphosis and lordosis. Spine 7:335–342PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tardieu C, Barrau A, Baylac M, Boulay C, Carlier R, Duval-Beaupere G (2002) Balance of the spine above the pelvis in humans: key-role of a new pelvic sagittal parameter, ‘The Angle of Incidence’. A comparison with non-human great apes. Folia Primatol 73:163Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Testut L, Latarjet A (1948) Ostéologie, arthrologie, myologie. In: Testut L, Latarjet A (eds) Traité d’anatomie humaine. Testut LLatarjet A, Paris, pp 71–84 et 356–393Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vaz G, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2002) Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine. Eur Spine J 11:80–87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, Templier A, Skalli W, Guigui P (2005) Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87-A:260–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vidal J, Marnay T (1983) A study of antero-posterior trunk balance and pelvic morphology in lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. Rev Chir Orthop 69:17–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vidal J, Marnay T (1983) Morphology and anteroposterior body equilibrium in spondylolisthesis L5-S1. Rev Chir Orthop 69:17–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vidal J, Marnay T (1984) Sagittal deviations of the spine, and trial of classification as a function of the pelvic balance. Rev Chir Orthop 70:124–126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vidal J, Marnay T, Maury P (1993) Rachidial equilibrium in spondylolisthesis. Minerva Ortop Traumatol 44:797–799Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Boulay
    • 1
    • 4
  • C. Tardieu
    • 2
  • J. Hecquet
    • 2
  • C. Benaim
    • 1
  • B. Mouilleseaux
    • 7
  • C. Marty
    • 3
  • D. Prat-Pradal
    • 4
  • J. Legaye
    • 5
  • G. Duval-Beaupère
    • 6
  • J. Pélissier
    • 1
  1. 1.Département de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, CHU CaremeauNîmes cedex 4France
  2. 2.Unité Mixte de Recherche UMR 8570, Laboratoire d’Anatomie comparée, Museum National d’Histoire NaturelleC.N.R.S.Paris cedexFrance
  3. 3.Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, CHU Raymond PoincaréGarches cedexFrance
  4. 4.Laboratoire d’Anatomie, UFR de Médecine Montpellier-NîmesNîmes cedexFrance
  5. 5.Service d’OrthopédieClinique Universitaire U.C.L. de Mont-GodinneYvoirBelgique
  6. 6.Directeur de RechercheDirectrice Honoraire de l’Unité U 215 INSERM, CHU Raymond PoincaréGarches cedexFrance
  7. 7.Service de Médecine Physique et de RéadaptationCentre Hospitalier GénéralMulhouse cedexFrance

Personalised recommendations