Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 705–718 | Cite as

Review of existing grading systems for cervical or lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration

  • Annette Kettler
  • Hans-Joachim WilkeEmail author
Review

Abstract

The aim of this literature review was to present and to evaluate all grading systems for cervical and lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration, which are accessible from the MEDLINE database. A MEDLINE search was conducted to select all articles presenting own grading systems for cervical or lumbar disc or facet joint degeneration. To give an overview, these grading systems were listed systematically depending on the spinal region they refer to and the methodology used for grading. All systems were checked for reliability tests and those recommended for use having an interobserver Kappa or Intraclass Correlation Coefficient >0.60 if disc degeneration was graded and >0.40 if facet joint degeneration was graded. MEDLINE search revealed 42 different grading systems. Thirty of these were used to grade lumbar spine degeneration, ten were used to grade cervical spine degeneration and two were used to grade both. Thus, the grading systems for the lumbar spine represented the vast majority of all 42 grading systems. Interobserver reliability tests were found for 12 grading systems. Based on their Kappa or Intraclass Correlation Coefficients nine of these could be recommended for use and three could not. All other systems could neither be recommended nor not be recommended since reliability tests were missing. These systems should therefore first be tested before use. The design of the grading systems varied considerably. Five grading systems were beginning with the lowest degree of degeneration, 37, however, with the normal, not degenerated state. A 5-grade scale was used in six systems, a 4-grade scale in 24, a 3-grade scale in eight and a 2-grade scale in three systems. In 15 cases the normal, not degenerated state was assigned to “grade 0”, in another 15 cases, however, this state was assigned to “grade 1”. This wide variety in the design of the grading systems makes comparisons difficult and may easily lead to confusion. We would therefore recommend to define certain standards. Our suggestion would be to use a scale of three to five grades, to begin the scale with the not degenerated state and to assign this state to “grade 0”.

Keywords

Cervical Spine Grade System Disc Degeneration Facet Joint Lumbar Disc 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would specially like to thank the Deutsche Arthrose-Hilfe e.V. and the German Research Council (DFG, WI 1352/6-1) for financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams MA, Dolan P, Hutton WC (1986) The stages of disc degeneration as revealed by discograms. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68(1):36–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adams MA, McNally DS, Dolan P (1996) ’Stress’ distributions inside intervertebral discs. The effects of age and degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(6):965–972CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berlemann U, Gries NC, Moore RJ (1998) The relationship between height, shape and histological changes in early degeneration of the lower lumbar discs. Eur Spine J 7(3):212–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boos N, Nerlich AG, Wiest I, von der Mark K, Aebi M (1997) Immunolocalization of type X collagen in human lumbar intervertebral discs during ageing and degeneration. Histochem Cell Biol 108(6):471–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boos N, Wallin A, Schmucker T, Aebi M, Boesch C (1994) Quantitative MR imaging of lumbar intervertebral disc and vertebral bodies: methodology, reproducibility, and preliminary results. Magn Reson Imaging 12(4):577–587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boos N, Weissbach S, Rohrbach H, Weiler C, Spratt KF, Nerlich AG (2002) Classification of age-related changes in lumbar intervertebral discs: 2002 Volvo Award in basic science. Spine 27(23):2631–2644CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brant-Zawadzki MN, Jensen MC, Obuchowski N, Ross JS, Modic MT (1995) Interobserver and intraobserver variability in interpretation of lumbar disc abnormalities. A comparison of two nomenclatures (discussion 1264). Spine 20(11):1257–1263PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brooker AE, Barter RW (1965) Cervical spondylosis. A clinical study with comparative radiology. Brain 88(5):925–936PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buckwalter JA (1995) Aging and degeneration of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 20(11):1307–1314PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Butler D, Trafimow JH, Andersson GB, McNeill TW, Huckman MS (1990) Discs degenerate before facets. Spine 15(2):111–113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carrera GF, Haughton VM, Syvertsen A, Williams AL (1980) Computed tomography of the lumbar facet joints. Radiology 134(1):145–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cohen J (1968) Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 70:213–220Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Collins DH (1949) The pathology of articular and spinal diseases. Edward Arnold & Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Coste J, Judet O, Barre O, Siaud JR, Cohen de Lara A, Paolaggi JB (1994) Inter- and intraobserver variability in the interpretation of computed tomography of the lumbar spine. J Clin Epidemiol 47(4):375–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cote P, Cassidy JD, Yong-Hing K, Sibley J, Loewy J (1997) Apophysial joint degeneration, disc degeneration, and sagittal curve of the cervical spine. Can they be measured reliably on radiographs? Spine 22(8):859–864CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coventry MB (1945) The intervertebral disc: Its macroscopic anatomy and pathology: Part III. Pathological changes in the intervertebral disc lesion. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 27:460–473Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Coventry MB (1945) The intervertebral disc: Its microscopic anatomy and pathology: Part I. Anatomy, development and pathology. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 27:105–112Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Coventry MB (1945) The intervertebral disc: Its microscopic anatomy and pathology: Part II. Changes in the intervertebral disc concomitant with age. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 27:233–247Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Demaerel P, Wilms G, Goffin J, Baert AL (1992) Osteoarthritis of the facet joints and its role in low-back pain: evaluation with conventional tomography. J Belge Radiol 75(2):81–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eisenstein SM, Parry CR (1987) The lumbar facet arthrosis syndrome. Clinical presentation and articular surface changes. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69(1):3–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fletcher G, Haughton VM, Ho KC, Yu SW (1990) Age-related changes in the cervical facet joints: studies with cryomicrotomy, MR, and CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 154(4):817–820PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fraser RD, Osti OL, Vernon-Roberts B (1993) Intervertebral disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 1:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Friberg S, Hirsch C (1949) Anatomical and clinical studies on lumbar disc degeneration. Acta Orthop Scand 19:222–242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Friedenberg ZB, Miller WT (1963) Degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 45:1171–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Galante JO (1967) Tensile properties of the human lumbar annulus fibrosus. Acta Orthop Scand (Suppl100):1–91Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gibson MJ, Buckley J, Mawhinney R, Mulholland RC, Worthington BS (1986) Magnetic resonance imaging and discography in the diagnosis of disc degeneration. A comparative study of 50 discs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68(3):369–373PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gordon SJ, Yang KH, Mayer PJ, Mace AH Jr, Kish VL, Radin EL (1991) Mechanism of disc rupture. A preliminary report. Spine 16(4):450–456PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gries NC, Berlemann U, Moore RJ, Vernon-Roberts B (2000) Early histologic changes in lower lumbar discs and facet joints and their correlation. Eur Spine J 9(1):23–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Grogan J, Nowicki BH, Schmidt TA, Haughton VM (1997) Lumbar facet joint tropism does not accelerate degeneration of the facet joints. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 18(7):1325–1329Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gunzburg R, Parkinson R, Moore R et al (1992) A cadaveric study comparing discography, magnetic resonance imaging, histology, and mechanical behavior of the human lumbar disc. Spine 17(4):417–426PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hendry NG (1958) The hydration of the nucleus pulposus and its relation to intervertebral disc derangement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 40B(1):132–144Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hirsch C (1972) Some morphological changes in the cervical spine during ageing. In: Hirsch C, Zotterman Y (eds) Cervical pain. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 21–32Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kellgren JH, Jeffrey MR, Ball J (1963) The epidemiology of chronic rheumatism. vol II: Atlas of standard radiographs of arthritis. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 14–19Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1952) Rheumatism in miners. II. X-ray study. Br J Ind Med 9(3):197–207PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16(4):494–502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lane NE, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Hochberg MC (1993) Reliability of new indices of radiographic osteoarthritis of the hand and hip and lumbar disc degeneration. J Rheumatol 20(11):1911–1918PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lehto IJ, Tertti MO, Komu ME, Paajanen HE, Tuominen J, Kormano MJ (1994) Age-related MRI changes at 0.1 T in cervical discs in asymptomatic subjects. Neuroradiology 36(1):49–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lindblom K (1944) Protrusions of discs and nerve compression in the lumbar region. Acta Radiol 25:195Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lindblom K (1951) Backache and its relation to ruptures of the intravertebral disks. Radiology 57(5):710–719PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lindblom K (1951) Discography of dissecting transosseous ruptures of intervertebral discs in the lumbar region. Acta Radiol 36(1):12–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Macnab I (1975) Cervical spondylosis. Clin Orthop (109):69–77Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Madan SS, Rai A, Harley JM (2003) Interobserver error in interpretation of the radiographs for degeneration of the lumbar spine. Iowa Orthop J 23:51–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Masaryk TJ, Ross JS, Modic MT, Boumphrey F, Bohlman H, Wilber G (1988) High-resolution MR imaging of sequestered lumbar intervertebral disks. AJR Am J Roentgenol 150(5):1155–1162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Milgram J (1990) Intervertebral disc disease and degenerative arthritis of the spine. In: Milgram J (ed) Radiologic and histologic pathology of nontumorous dieseases of bone and joints. Northbrook Publishing Company, pp 519–588Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mimura M, Panjabi MM, Oxland TR, Crisco JJ, Yamamoto I, Vasavada A (1994) Disc degeneration affects the multidirectional flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 19(12):1371–1380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Nachemson A (1960) Lumbar Intradiscal Pressure. Experimental studies on post-mortem material. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 43:43Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Naylor A, Smare DL (1953) Fluid content of the nucleus pulposus as a factor in the disk syndrome; preliminary report. Br Med J 4843:975–976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Nerlich AG, Schleicher ED, Boos N (1997) 1997 Volvo Award winner in basic science studies. Immunohistologic markers for age-related changes of human lumbar intervertebral discs. Spine 22(24):2781–2795CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Osti OL, Vernon-Roberts B, Fraser RD (1990) 1990 Volvo Award in experimental studies. Anulus tears and intervertebral disc degeneration. An experimental study using an animal model. Spine 15(8):762–767PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pathria M, Sartoris DJ, Resnick D (1987) Osteoarthritis of the facet joints: accuracy of oblique radiographic assessment. Radiology 164(1):227–230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 26(17):1873–1878CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Resnick D (1985) Degenerative diseases of the vertebral column. Radiology 156(1):3–14Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Schellhas KP, Smith MD, Gundry CR, Pollei SR (1996) Cervical discogenic pain. Prospective correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and discography in asymptomatic subjects and pain sufferers (discussion 311–312). Spine 21(3):300–311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Schneiderman G, Flannigan B, Kingston S, Thomas J, Dillin WH, Watkins RG (1987) Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of disc degeneration: correlation with discography. Spine 12(3):276–281PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Shrout PE, Fleiss J (1979) Intraclass correlations: Uses in Assessing Rater Reliability. Psychol Bull 86(2):420–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Silberstein CE (1965) The Evolution of Degenerative Changes in the Cervical Spine and an Investigation into the “Joints of Luschka”. Clin Orthop 40:184–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Streiner DL, Norman GL (1989) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Swanepoel MW, Adams LM, Smeathers JE (1995) Human lumbar apophyseal joint damage and intervertebral disc degeneration. Ann Rheum Dis 54(3):182–188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Tanno I, Oguma H, Murakami G, Sato S, Yamashita T (2003) Which portion in a facet is specifically affected by articular cartilage degeneration with aging in the human lumbar zygapophysial joint? Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 80(1):29–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Tertti M, Paajanen H, Laato M, Aho H, Komu M, Kormano M (1991) Disc degeneration in magnetic resonance imaging. A comparative biochemical, histologic, and radiologic study in cadaver spines. Spine 16(6):629–634PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Thompson JP, Pearce RH, Schechter MT, Adams ME, Tsang IK, Bishop PB (1990) Preliminary evaluation of a scheme for grading the gross morphology of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 15(5):411–415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Töndury G (1972) The behaviour of the cervical discs during life. In: Hirsch C, Zotterman Y (eds) Cervical pain. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 59–66Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Vernon-Roberts B (1987) Pathology of intervertebral discs and apophyseal joints. The lumbar spine and back pain. Churchill-Livingstone, London, pp 37–55Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Vernon-Roberts B, Pirie CJ (1977) Degenerative changes in the intervertebral discs of the lumbar spine and their sequelae. Rheumatol Rehabil 16(1):13–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Viikari-Juntura E, Raininko R, Videman T, Porkka L (1989) Evaluation of cervical disc degeneration with ultralow field MRI and discography. An experimental study on cadavers. Spine 14(6):616–619PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Virgin WJ (1951) Experimental investigations into the physical properties of the intervertebral disc. J Bone Joint Surg Br 33B(4):607–611PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Virgin WJ (1958) Anatomical and pathological aspects of the intervertebral disc. Indian J Surg 20:113Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Boos N, Hodler J (1999) MR imaging and CT in osteoarthritis of the lumbar facet joints. Skeletal Radiol 28(4):215–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Wybier M (2001) Imaging of lumbar degenerative changes involving structures other than disk space. Radiol Clin North Am 39(1):101–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Yasuma T, Koh S, Okamura T, Yamauchi Y (1990) Histological changes in aging lumbar intervertebral discs. Their role in protrusions and prolapses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72(2):220–229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Yu S, Haughton VM, Sether LA, Ho KC, Wagner M (1989) Criteria for classifying normal and degenerated lumbar intervertebral disks. Radiology 170(2):523–536PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Ziv I, Maroudas C, Robin G, Maroudas A (1993) Human facet cartilage: swelling and some physicochemical characteristics as a function of age. Part 2: age changes in some biophysical parameters of human facet joint cartilage. Spine 18(1):136–146Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Orthopaedic Research and BiomechanicsUniversity of UlmUlmGermany

Personalised recommendations