European Spine Journal

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 982–991 | Cite as

Validation of new clinical quantitative analysis software applicable in spine orthopaedic studies

Original Article

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate an X-ray films analysis software, i.e. to estimate the reliability and validity of clinical measurements by means of this software. The authors first performed tests of precision and reproducibility of measures. The precision for dynamic modules was estimated at ±2° for the lumbar analysis and ±3° for the cervical one. Mean reproducibility coefficients calculated for postural modules are about 4° for the angular parameters and 3 mm for the linear ones. We also evaluated clinical applicability of the software through its validity. Reference values calculated on a population of healthy subjects showed agreement with the literature. Then, when analysing postural X-ray films of severe scoliotic patients, we found that inter-observer reproducibility coefficients show a lower reliability of measurements; the main cause seems to be the low visibility of anatomic landmarks due to the quality of X-ray films and to the degree of deformity. This study allowed to better estimate the reliability and the usefulness of this tool, allowing for multicentric studies and exchanges.

Keywords

Spine X-ray Quantitative analysis Software Motion Balance 

References

  1. 1.
    Altmann D, Bland M (1983) Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 32:307–317Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernhardt M, Bridwell KH (1989) Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction. Spine 14(7):717–721PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cheung J, Wever DJ, Veldhuizen AG, Klein JP, Verdonck B, Nijlunsing R, Cool JC, Van Horn JR (2002) The reliability of quantitative analysis on digital images of the scoliotic spine. Eur Spine J 11:535–542Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duval-Beaupère G, Schimt C, Cosson PH (1992) A barycentrometric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis. Ann Biomed Eng 20(4):51–62Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke KB, McEnery KW (1995) An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine 20(12):1351–1358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guigui P, Levassor N et al (2003) Physiological value of pelvic and spinal parameters of sagittal balance: analysis of 250 healthy volunteers. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 89(6):496–506PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hopkins WG (2000) Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med 30:1–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jackson RP, Kanemura T, Kawakami N, Hales C (2000) Lumbopelvic lordosis and pelvic balance on repeated standing lateral radiographs of adults volunteers and untreated patients with constant low back pain. Spine 25(5):575–586CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jackson RP, McManus AC (1994) Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex and size. Spine 19(14):1611–1618PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kauffmann C, Godbout B, De Guise J (1998) Simplified active contour model applied to bone structures segmentation in digital radiographs. In: Medical imaging 1998, SPIE’S International Symposium, San Diego, California, USA, 21–27 February, 3338: 663–672Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Legaye J, Hecquet J, Marty C, Duval-Beaupère G (1993) Equilibre sagittal du rachis. Rachis 5(5):215–226Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marty C, Boisaubert B, Descamps H, Montigny JP, Hecquet J, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G (2002) The sagittal anatomy of the sacrum among young adults, infants, and spondylolisthesis patients. Eur Spine J 11(2):119–125Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pearcy MJ, Bogduk N (1988) Instantaneous axes of rotation of the lumbar intervertebral joints. Spine 13(9):1033–1041PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Portney LG, Watkins MP (1993) Foundations of clinical research Applications and practice. Appleton& Lange, Norwalk ISBN 0-8385-1065-5, pp 509–516Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Precision measurement of disc height, vertebral height and sagittal plane displacement from lateral radiographic views of lumbar spine (1997) Clinical biomechanics 12(suppl):1Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prothèses discales et arthrodèses dans la pathologie dégénérative du rachis lombaire - rapport de l’ANAES, Mai 2000Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rajnics P, Pomero V, De Guise J, Mouilleseaux B, Lavaste F, Skalli W (2001) Computer-assisted assessment of spinal sagittal plane radiographs. J Spinal Disord 14:135–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rillardon L, Levassor N, Guigui P, Wodecki P, Cardinne L, Templier A, Skalli W (2003) Validation of a tool to measure pelvic and spinal parameters of sagittal balance. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 89(3):218–227PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sai Wing Lee, Kris WN Wong et al (2002) Development and validation of a new technique for assessing lumbar spine motion. Spine 27:E215–E220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shea KG, Stevens PM, Nelson M, Smith Jt, Masters KS, Yandow S (1998) A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement. Intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles. Spine 23:551–555PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shrout P, Fleiss J (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 68:420–428Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stagnara P, De Mauroy JC, Dran G et al (1982) Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in a sagittal plane: approach to references for evaluation of kyphosis and lordosis. Spine 7(4):335–342PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Templier A, Skalli W, Diop A, Vital JM, Mazel C, Saillant G, Delecrin J, Dubousset J, Lavaste F (1999) Evaluation radiographique quantitative des arthrodèses rachidiennes lombaires: protocole et analyse préliminaire d’une série multicentrique de 119 cas. Rachis, pp 23–37Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Toussignant M, Duclos E et al (2002) Validity study for the cervical range of motion device used for lateral flexion in patients with neck pain. Spine 27:812–817PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Troyanovich SJ, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Harrison DD, Harrison DE (1997) Radiographic mensuration characteristics of the sagittal lumbar spine from a normal population with a method to synthesize prior studies of lordosis. J Spinal Disord 10:380–386PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vaz G, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2002) Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine. Eur Spine J 11(1):80–87Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Voutsinas SA, MacEwen GD (1986) Sagittal profiles of the spine. Clin Orthop 210:235–242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    White Paper on Sagittal Plane Alignment, Scoliosis Research SocietyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire de Biomécanique, ENSAM-CNRSParisFrance
  2. 2.Institut Mutualiste MontsourisParisFrance
  3. 3.LIO-ETS MontréalMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations