European Spine Journal

, Volume 15, Issue 7, pp 1050–1067 | Cite as

Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review

  • Carmen BouzaEmail author
  • Teresa López
  • Angeles Magro
  • Lourdes Navalpotro
  • José María Amate
Review Article


The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty (BK) in the management of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). This study is based on a systematic review of the literature (until October 2004) and meta-analysis of clinical studies assessing the efficacy and safety of BK in the treatment of VCFs. Estimates of effect were based on a random effects model. Meta-regression analyses were carried out where required. A total of 26 studies met the inclusion criteria. Although studies displayed considerable methodological limitations, the results of the clinical series indicate significant improvements in pain intensity, vertebral height, sagittal alignment, functional capacity, and quality of life. Compared with conventional medical management, BK afforded significant improvement in pain intensity and mobility. Likewise, a significant reduction was observed in vertebral collapse, kyphotic deformity, the development of new vertebral fractures, and hospital stay. Compared with vertebroplasty, the technique reduced the loss of height and the degree of kyphotic deformity, and afforded a significantly lower leakage rate—with no differences in relation to other variables. Regarding adverse effects, leakage affected 7% of all levels treated, while complications were recorded in 2% of the patients, and new vertebral fractures in 16%. The available evidence suggests that BK can be effective and safe in application to VCFs. However, existing studies evince substantial methodological limitations and relatively short follow-up periods. Better clinical research is required to determine the capacity of BK to avoid the functional and physiological sequelae of VCFs and to define the true role of the technique among the existing therapeutic options.


Balloon kyphoplasty Evidence Meta-analysis Vertebral compression fractures 


  1. 1.
    Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures—Surgical. ASERNIP-S (2003) Percutaneous Vertebroplasty. New and Emerging Techniques-SurgicalGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Fenton DC, Scribner RM, Reiley ME, Talmadge K (2001) An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of an inflatable bone tamp used in the treatment of compression fracture. Spine 26:151–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benson K, Hartz AJ (2000) A comparison of observational studies and randomized controlled trials. N Engl J Med 342:1878–1886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berlemann U, Franz T, Orler R, Heini PF (2004) Kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a prospective non-randomized study. Eur Spine J 13:496–501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Black N (1996) Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. BMJ 312:1215–1218PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technologies Assessment (CCOHTA) (2002). Percutaneous vertebroplasty: a bone cement procedure for spinal pain relief. Issues Emerg Health Technol 31:1–4Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clarke M, Oxman AD (2003) Cochrane reviewer’s handbook 4.1.6 [updated January 2003]. The Cochrane library, number 1, Update Software, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cortet B, Roches E, Logier R, Houvenagel E, Gaydier-Souquieres G, Puisieux F, Delcambre B (2002) Evaluation of spinal curvatures after a recent osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Joint Bone Spine 69:201–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coumans JVCE, Reinhardt MK, Lieberman IH (2003) Kyphoplasty for vertebral compression fractures: 1-year clinical outcomes from a prospective study. J Neurosurg 99:44–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crandall D, Slaughter D, Hankins PJ, Moore C, Jerman J (2004) Acute versus chronic vertebral compression fractures treated with kyphoplasty: early results. Spine J 4:418–424 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fourney DR, Schomer DF, Nader R, Chlan-Fourney J, Suki D, Ahrar K, Rhines LD, Gokaslan ZL (2003) Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for painful vertebral body fractures in cancer patients. J Neurosurg 98:21–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fribourg D, Tang C, Parveen S, Delamartier R (2004) Incidence of subsequent vertebral fracture after Kyphoplasty. Spine 29:2270–2276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gaitanis IN, Hadjipavlou AG, Katonis PG, Tzermiadianos MN, Pasku DS, Patwardhan A (2005) Balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of pathological vertebral compressive fractures (Epub 2004 October 8). Eur Spine J 14:250–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Garfin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA (2001) New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine 26:1511–1515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Garfin SR (2003) Kyphon’s postmarketing study: Vertebral Body Compression Fracture Patient Registry. Final report. Kyphon IncGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gavaghan DJ, Moore RA, McQuay HJ (2000) An evaluation of homogeneity tests in meta-analyses in pain using simulations of individual patient data. Pain 85:415–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grados F, Depriester C, Cayrolle G, Hardy N, Deramond H, Fardellone P (2000) Long-term observations of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty. Rheumatology 39:1410–1414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grohs JG, Krepler P (2004) Minimal invasive stabilization of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Methods and Preinterventional Diagnostics Radiologe 44:254–259Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hardouin P, Fayada P, Leclet H, Chopin D (2002) Kyphoplasty. Joint Bone Spine 69:256–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harrop JS, Prpa B, Reinhardt MK, Lieberman I (2004) Primary and secondary osteoporosis’ incidence of subsequent vertebral compression fractures after kyphoplasty. Spine 29:2120–2125 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heini PF, Orler R (2004) Kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Eur Spine J 13:184–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hillmeier J, Meeder PJ, Noldge G, Kock HJ, Da Fonseca K, Kasperk HC (2004) Augmentation von Wirbelkorperfrakturen mit einem neuen Calciumphosphat-Zement nach Ballon-Kyphoplastie. Orthopade 33:31–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kado DM, Browner WS, Palermo L, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Cummings SR (1999) Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arch Intern Med 159:1215–1220 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kang JD, An H, Boden S, Phillips F, Foley K, Abdu W (2003) Cement augmentation of osteoporotic compression fractures and intraoperative navigation: summary statement. Spine 28:S62–S63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kasperk HC, Hillmeier J, Noldge G, Grafe IA, DaFonseca K, Raupp D (2005) Treatment of painful vertebral fractures by kyphoplasty in patients with primary osteoporosis: a prospective cohort study (Epub 2004). J Bone Mineral Res 20:604–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Komp M, Ruetten S, Godolias G (2004). Minimally invasive therapy for functionally unstable osteoporotic vertebral fracture by means of kyphoplasty: prospective comparative study of 19 surgically and 17 conservatively treated patients. J Miner Stoffwechs 11:13–15Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lane JM, Johnson CE, Khan SN, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP (2002) Minimally invasive options for the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 33:431–438 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ledlie JT, Renfro M (2003) Balloon kyphoplasty: one-year outcomes in vertebral body height restoration, chronic pain, and activity levels. J Neurosurg 98:36–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Levine SA, Perin LA, Hayes D (2000). An evidence based evaluation of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Manag Care 9:56–60 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lieberman IH, Dudeney S, Reinhardt M, Bell G (2001) Initial outcome and efficacy of “kyphoplasty” in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine 26:1631–1638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lieberman I, Reinhardt MK (2003) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for osteolytic vertebral collapse. Clin Orthop S176–S186Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C (2001) Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA 285:320–323 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    MacLean CH, Morton SC, Ofman JJ, Roth EA, Shekelle PG (2003) How useful are unpublished data from the Food and Drug Administration in meta-analysis? J Clin Epidemiol 56:44–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Masala S, Cesaroni A, Sergiacomi G, Fiori R, Massari F, Manenti G, Nardi P, Simonetti G (2004) Percutaneous kyphoplasty: new treatment for painful vertebral body fractures. In Vivo 18:149–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moore RA, Gavaghan D, Tremer MR, Collins Sl, McQuay HJ (1998) Size is everything-large amounts of information are needed to overcome random effects in estimating direction and magnitude of treatment effects. Pain 78:209–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2003) Interventional procedure overview of Balloon Kyphoplasty for vertebral compression fractures.
  37. 37.
    National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004) Guide to the methods of Technology Appraisal. pp 1–40.
  38. 38.
    Old JL, Calvert M (2004) Vertebral compression fractures in the elderly. Am Fam Physician 69:111–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Papaioannou A, Watts NB, Kendler DL, Yuen CK, Adachi JD, Ferko N (2002) Diagnosis and management of vertebral fractures in elderly adults. Am J Med 113:220–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Phillips FM (2003) Minimally invasive treatments of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine 28:S45–S53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Phillips FM, Todd Wetzel F, Lieberman I, Campbell-Hupp M (2002) An in vivo comparison of the potential for extravertebral cement leak after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Spine 27:2173–2178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Phillips FM, Ho E, Campbell-Hupp M, McNally T, Todd Wetzel F, Gupta P (2003) Early radiographic and clinical results of balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine 28:2260–2265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rhyne A, Banit D, Laxer E, Odum S, Nussman D (2004) Kyphoplasty: report of eighty-two thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral fractures. J Orthop Trauma 18:294–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Riggs BL, Melton LJ (1995) The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone 17:S505–S511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Royle P, Waugh N (2003) Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessments reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system. Health Technol Assess 7(34):1–51Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Schlaich C, Minne HW, Bruckner T (1998) Reduced pulmonary function in patients with spinal osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 8:261–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schwartz D (1981) Méthodes statistiques à l’usage des médecins et des biologistes. Flammarion Médecine-Science, ParisGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Silverman SL (1992) The clinical consequences of vertebral compression fracture. Bone 13:S27–S31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Smith LA, Oldman AD, McQuay HJ, Moore RA (2000) Teasing apart quality and validity in systematic reviews: an example from acupuncture trials on chronic neck and back pain. Pain 86:119–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tamayo-Orozco J, Arzac-Palumbo P, Peon-Vidales H, Mota-Bolfeta R, Fuentes F (1997) Vertebral fractures associated with osteoporosis: patient management. Am J Med 103:S44–S50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Tang J, Liu JL (2000) Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 53:477–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    The European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS) Group (2002) Incidence of vertebral fracture in Europe: Results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS) J Bone Miner Res 17:716–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Theodorou DJ, Theodorou SJ, Duncan TD, Garfin SR, Wong WH (2002) Percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for the correction of spinal deformity in painful vertebral body compression fractures. Clin Imaging 26:1–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Truumees E, Hilibrand A, Vaccaro AR (2004) Percutaneous vertebral augmentation. Spine J 4:218–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Watts NB, Harris ST, Genant HK (2001) Treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Osteoporos Int 12:429–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Weisskopf M, Herlein S, Birnbaum K, Siebert C, Stanzel S, Wirtz DC (2003) Kyphoplastie - Ein neues minimalinvasives Verfahren zur Aufrichtung und Stabilisierung von Wirbelkorpern. [Kyphoplasty - a new minimally invasive treatment for repositioning and stabilising vertebral bodies]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 141:406–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wilcox RK (2004) The biomechanics of Vertebroplasty: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H ] 218:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Wilhelm K, Stoffel M, Ringel F, Rao G, Rosseler L, Urbach H, Meyer B (2003) Ballon-Kyphoplastie zur Behandlung schmerzhafter osteoporotischer Wirbelkorperfrakturen - Technik und erste Ergebnisse. [Preliminary experience with balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 175:1690–1696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Wong W, Reiley MA, Garfin S (2000) Vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty. J Women’s Imaging 2:117–121Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Yuan HA, Brown CW, Phillips FM (2004) Osteoporotic spinal deformity: a biomechanical rationale for the clinical consequences and treatment of vertebral body compression fractures. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:236–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carmen Bouza
    • 1
    Email author
  • Teresa López
    • 1
  • Angeles Magro
    • 1
  • Lourdes Navalpotro
    • 1
  • José María Amate
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIAgency for Health Technology AssessmentMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations