Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 15, Issue 8, pp 1183–1188 | Cite as

Relationship between Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire and cervical spine MR imaging findings

  • Estanislao AranaEmail author
  • Luis Martí-Bonmatí
  • Ruben Montijano
  • Daniel Bautista
  • Enrique Molla
  • Salvador Costa
Original Article

Abstract

The study was aimed at determining the association between the self-report of pain and disability by means of Northwick neck pain questionnaire (NPQ) and cervical spine MR imaging findings. A random sample of 251 patients, 132 men and 119 women aged 43±13 years, submitted with neck pain were investigated. Patients with previous discitis, surgery, neoplasm or hospitalized for cervical spine trauma were excluded. All patients completed the NPQ and were studied with sagittal gradient-echo T1 and turbo spin-echo T2, axial gradient-echo T2* and heavily T2 weighted MR myelographic weighted images. MR images of the two most affected disc levels were read, offering an MR imaging score from 0 to 30. There was no statistically significant correlation between NPQ and MR imaging scores. From the NPQ items, only difficulty in sleeping and numbness were related to the MR imaging score. Disc extrusion was the only MR finding almost significantly associated with NPQ (P=0.054). Neck injury did not increase NPQ scores. In patients with neck pain, NPQ scores do not correlate with MR imaging findings. NPQ and cervical spine MR imaging show different facets of the multidimensional complex of neck pain.

Keywords

Neck pain Northwick neck pain questionnaire Disability Quality of life Magnetic resonance imaging Disc degeneration 

References

  1. 1.
    Boutin RD, Steinbach LS, Finnesey K (2000) MR imaging of degenerative diseases in the cervical spine. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 8:471–489PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen CJ, Hsu HL, Niu CC, Chen TY, Chen MC, Tseng YC, Wong YC, Wang LJ (2003) Cervical degenerative disease at flexion–extension MR imaging: prediction criteria. Radiology 227:136–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fujiwara A, Tamai K, Yamato M, An HS, Yoshida H, Saotome K, Kurihashi A (1999) The relationship between facet joint osteoarthritis and disc degeneration of the lumbar spine: an MRI study. Eur Spine J 8:396–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    González T, Balsa A, Sáinz de Murieta J, Zamorano E, González I, Martin-Mola E (2001) Spanish version of the Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire: reliability and validity. Clin Exp Rheumatol 19:41–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gore DR (2001) Roentgenographic findings in the cervical spine in asymptomatic persons. A ten-year follow-up. Spine 26:2463–2466CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guez M, Hildingsson C, Nilsson M, Toolanen G (2002) The prevalence of neck pain. A population-based study from northern Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 73:455–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guez M, Hildingsson C, Stegmayr B, Toolanen G (2003) Chronic neck pain of traumatic and non-traumatic origin. Acta Orthop Scand 74:576–579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hollingworth W, Dixon AK, Todd CJ, Bell MI, Antoun NM, Arafat Q, Girling S, Karia KR, Laing RJ (1998) Self reported health status and magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with low back pain. Eur Spine J 7:369–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoving JL, O’Leary EF, Niere KR, Green S, Buchbinder R (2003) Validity of the neck disability index, Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire, and problem elicitation technique for measuring disability associated with whiplash-associated disorders. Pain 102:273–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kasai Y, Uchida A (2001) New evaluation method using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121:508–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kwan O, Fiel J (2002) Critical appraisal of facet joints injections for chronic whiplash. Med Sci Monit 8:RA191–RA195PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lankester BJ, Garneti N, Bannister GC (2004) The classification of outcome following whiplash injury—a comparison of methods. Eur Spine J 13:605–609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leak AM, Cooper J, Dyer S, Williams KA, Turner-Stokes L, Frank AO (1994) The Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire, devised to measure neck pain and disability. Br J Rheumatol 33:469–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lo YL, Chan LL, Lim W, Tan SB, Tan CT, Chen JL, Fook-Chong S, Ratnagopal P (2004) Systematic correlation of transcranial magnetic stimulation and magnetic resonance imaging in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 29:1137–1145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Luo X, Edwards CL, Richardson W, Hey L (2004) Relationships of clinical, psychologic, and individual factors with the functional status of neck pain patients. Value Health 7:61–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    MacGregor AJ, Andrew T, Sambrook PN, Spector TD (2004) Structural, psychological, and genetic influences on low back and neck pain: a study of adult female twins. Arthritis Rheum 51:160–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McClure P (2000) The degenerative cervical spine: pathogenesis and rehabilitation concepts. J Hand Ther 13:163–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McGillicuddy JE (2004) Cervical radiculopathy, entrapment neuropathy, and thoracic outlet syndrome: how to differentiate? Invited submission from the joint section meeting on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 1:179–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marchiori DM, Henderson CN (1996) A cross-sectional study correlating cervical radiographic degenerative findings to pain and disability. Spine 21:2747–2751PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, Suzuki N, Nishi Y, Nakamura M, Yabe Y, Shiga H (1998) MRI of cervical intervertebral discs in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 80-B:19–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peolsson A, Hedlund R, Vavruch L, Oberg B (2003) Predictive factors for the outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Eur Spine J 12:274–280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peterson CK, Bolton JE, Wood AR, Humphreys BK (2003) A cross-sectional study correlating degeneration of the cervical spine with disability and pain in United Kingdom patients. Spine 28:129–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pietrobon R, Coeytaux RR, Carey TS, Richardson WJ, DeVellis RF (2002) Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction: a systematic review. Spine 27:515–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pool JJ, Hoving JL, de Vet HC, van Mameren H, Bouter LM (2004) The interexaminer reproducibility of physical examination of the cervical spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 27:84–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Puzzilli F, Mastronardi L, Ruggeri A, Lunardi P (1999) Intramedullary increased MR signal intensity and its relation to clinical features in cervical myelopathy. J Neurosurg Sci 43:135–139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rao R (2002) Neck pain, cervical radiculopathy, and cervical myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 84-A:1872–1881Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sambrook PN, MacGregor AJ, Spector TD (1999) Genetic influences on cervical and lumbar disc degeneration: a magnetic resonance imaging study in twins. Arthritis Rheum 42:366–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schellhas KP, Smith MD, Gundry CR, Pollei SR (1996) Cervical discogenic pain. Prospective correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and discography in asymptomatic subjects and pain sufferers. Spine 21:300–311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sengupta DK, Kirollos R, Findlay GF, Smith ET, Pearson J, Pigott T (1999) The value of MR imaging in differentiating between hard and soft cervical disc disease: a comparison with intraoperative findings. Eur Spine J 8:199–204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shafaie FF, Wippold FJ, Gado M, Pilgram TK, Riew KD (1999) Comparison of computed tomography myelography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy. Spine 24: 1781–1788CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Siivola SM, Levoska S, Tervonen O, Ilkko E, Vanharanta H, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S (2002) MRI changes of cervical spine in asymptomatic and symptomatic young adults. Eur Spine J 11:358–363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Strobel K, Pfirrmann CWA, Schmid M, Hodler J, Boos N, Zanetti M (2004) Cervical nerve root blocks: indications and role of MR imaging. Radiology 233:87–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Estanislao Arana
    • 1
    Email author
  • Luis Martí-Bonmatí
    • 1
  • Ruben Montijano
    • 1
  • Daniel Bautista
    • 2
  • Enrique Molla
    • 1
  • Salvador Costa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyClinica QuirónValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Preventive MedicineHospital Universitario Dr. PesetValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations