European Spine Journal

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 43–48 | Cite as

Functional results and the risk factors of reoperations after lumbar disc surgery

  • Bilge KaraEmail author
  • Zeliha Tulum
  • Ümit Acar
Original Article


Factors such as driving motor vehicles, sedentary occupations, vibration, smoking, previous full-term pregnancies, physical inactivity, increased body mass index (BMI), and a tall stature are associated with symptomatic disc herniations. Fitness and strength is postulated to protect an individual from disc rupture. The objective of our study was to determine the pain levels and differences of functional and economic situations of patients who had undergone one or more than one operation due to lumbar disc herniation and to put forward the effect of risk factors that may be potential, especially from the aspect of undergoing reoperation. Patients who had undergone one (n=46) or more than one operation (n=34) due to lumbar disc herniation were included in the study. It was a prospective study with evaluation on the day the patients were discharged and at second and sixth months after lumbar disc operation. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was used in determining the functional disability associated with back pain; the Prolo Functional Economic Rating Scale (Prolo scale) was used in determining the effect of back pain on functional and economic situations. In the ODI measurements made in the postoperative second and sixth months, significant differences appeared in favor of patients who had undergone one operation (p<0.05). According to the Prolo scale, it was found that the economic situation was better in the sixth month and the functional situation was better in the second and sixth months in patients having undergone one operation (p<0.05). The logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the lack of regular physical exercise was a significant predictor for reoperation (OR, 4.595; CI, 1.38–15.28), whereas gender, age, BMI, occupation, or smoking did not indicate so much significance as regular exercise.


Lumbar disc surgery Reoperations Risk factors Exercise 


  1. 1.
    Adams MA, Mannion AF, Dolan P (1999) Personal risk factors for first-time low back pain. Spine 24 (23):2497–2505CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barrios C, Ahmed M, Arrotegui JI, Bjornsson A (1990) Clinical factors predicting outcome after surgery for herniated lumbar disc: an epidemiological multivariate analysis. J Spinal Disord 3:205–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bruske-Hohlfeld I, Merritt JL, Onofrio BM, Stonnington HH, Offord KP, Bergstralh ES, Beard CM, Melton LJ 3rd, Kurland LT (1990) Incidence of lumbar disc surgery: A population-based study in Olmsted country, Minnesota, 1950–1979. Spine 15:31–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cassisi JE, Robinson ME, O’Conner P, MacMillan M (1993) Trunk strength and lumbar paraspinal muscle activity during isometric exercise in chronic low back pain. Spine 18:245–251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ciol MA, Deyo RA, Kreuter W, Bigos S (1994) Characteristics in medicare beneficiaries associated with reoperation after lumbar spine surgery. Spine 19:1329–1334PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Danielsen JM, Johnsen R, Kibsgaard SK, Hellevik E (2000) Early aggressive exercise for postoperative rehabilitation after discectomy. Spine 25(8):1015–1020CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dawson B, Trapp RG (2001) Basic and clinical bioistatistics. 3rd edn, Langemedical, Mc Graus-Hill Medical Publish Division, pp. 245–46,138–139Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dolan P, Greenfield K, Nelson RJ, Nelson IW (2000) Can exercise therapy improve the outcome of microdiscectomy? Spine 25(12):1523–1532CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elfering A, Semmer N, Birkhofer D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2002) Young investigator award 2001 winner: risk factors for lumbar disc degeneration. Spine 27(2):125–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fairbank JC, Abdu WA, Hanscom B, Winstein J N (2002) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ (2001) A comparison of a modified Oswestry low back pain disability scale. Physical Ther 81:776–788Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fritzell P, Hagg O,Wessberg PA (2001) 2001 Volvo award winner in clinical studies.Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 26, 2521–32, discussion 2532–2434Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gustavsen R (1985) Training therapy. Thieme, New York, p. 33Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hägg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A (2002) Characteristics of patients with chronic low back pain selected for surgery. A comparison with the general population. A report from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 27(11):1223–1231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    gg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A (2003) The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 12:12–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hagen KB,Tambs K,Bjerkedal T (2002) A prospective cohort study of risk factors for disability retirement because of back pain in the general working population. Spine 27(16):1790–1796CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Howe J, Frymoyer JW (1985) The effects of questionnaire design on the determination of end results in lumbar spinal surgery. Spine 10:804–805PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hurme M, Alaranta H (1987) Factors predicting the result of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 12:933–938PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Keskimaki I, Seitsalo S, Österman H, Rissanen P (2000) Reoperations after lumbar disc surgery. Spine 25(12):1500–1508CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kjellby-Wendt G, Styf J (1988) Early active training after lumbar discectomy: a prospective, randomized, and controlled study. Spine 23:2345–2351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Korres DS, Loupassis G, Stamos K (1992) Results of lumbar discectomy: a study using 15 different evaluation methods. Eur Spine J 1:20–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lefort SM, Hannah E (1994) Return to work following an aquafitness and muscle strenthening program for the low back injured. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lewis PS, Weir BK, Broad RW, Grace MG (1987) Long-term prospective study of lumbosacral discectomy. J Neurosurg 67:49–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Little DG, MacDonald D (1994) The use of the percentage change in Oswestry Disability Index Score as an outcome measure in lumbar spinal surgery. Spine 19:2139–2143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Luoma K, Riihimaki H, Luukkonen R, Raininko R, Juntura EV, Lamminen A (2000) Low back pain in relation to lumbar disc degeneration. Spine 25(4):487–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Manniche C, Skall HF, Braendhohlt L, Christensen BH, Christophersen L, Ellegard B, Ingerslev M, Jorgensen OE, Larsen E (1993) Clinical trial of postoperative dynamic back exercises after first lumbar discectomy. Spine 18(3):92–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Manniche C, Asmussen KH, Vinterberg H, Rose- Hansen EB, Kramhoft J, Jordan A (1994) Analysis of preoperative prognostic factors in first-time surgery for lumbar disc herniation, including Finneson’s and modified Spengler’s score systems. Dan Med Bull 41:110–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Manniche C, Asmussen KH, Vinterberg H, Rose-Hansen EB, Kramhoft J, Jordan A (1994) Back pain, sciatica and disability following first-time conventional haemilaminectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Use of “ low back pain rating scale” as a postal questionnaire. Dan Med Bull 41:103–106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pappas CTE, Harrigton T, Sonntag V (1992) Outcome analysis in 654 surgically treated lumbar disc herniations. Neurosurgery 30(6):862–865PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pransky G, Benjamin K, Hill-Fotouhi C, Fletcher KE, Himmelstein J, Katz JN (2002) Work-related outcomes in occupational low back pain. Spine 27(8):864–870CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Prolo DJ, Okulund SA, Butcher M (1986) Toward uniformity in evaluating results of lumbar spine operation. A paradigm applied to posterior lumbar inter body fusions. Spine 11:601–606PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Roland M, Fairbankt J (2000) The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine 25(24):3115–3124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Roy SH, CJ DL, Casavant DA (1989) Lumbar muscle fatigue and chronic lower back pain. Spine 14:992–1001PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Suk KS, Lee HM, Moon SH, Kim NH (2001) Recurrent lumbar disc herniation: results of operative management. Spine 26(6):672–676CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Taimela S, Diederich, Hubsch Marc, Heinricy M (2000) The role of physical exercise and ınactivity in pain recurrence and absenteeism from work after active outpatient rehabilitation for recurrent or chronic low back pain. Spine: 25(14) 1809–1816Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Thorvaldsen P, Sorensen EB (1989) Short-term outcome in lumbar spine surgery. Acta Neurochir 101:121–125Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Weber H (1994) The natural history of disc herniation and the influence of intervention. Spine 19(19):2234–2238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Videman T, Battiie M (1999) The influence of occupation on lumbar degeneration. Spine 241164–1168Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dokuz Eylül University School of Physical TherapyIzmirTurkey
  2. 2.Dokuz Eylül University Medicine Faculty Neurosurgical DepartmentIzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations