Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 13, Issue 6, pp 516–523 | Cite as

Clinical evidence for cervical myelopathy due to Chiari malformation and spinal stenosis in a non-randomized group of patients with the diagnosis of fibromyalgia

  • Dan S. Heffez
  • Ruth E. Ross
  • Yvonne Shade-Zeldow
  • Konstantinos Kostas
  • Sagar Shah
  • Robert Gottschalk
  • Dean A. Elias
  • Alan Shepard
  • Sue E. Leurgans
  • Charity G. Moore
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

While patients with fibromyalgia report symptoms consistent with cervical myelopathy, a detailed neurological evaluation is not routine. We sought to determine if patients with fibromyalgia manifest objective neurological signs of cervical myelopathy.

Methods

Two hundred and seventy patients, 18 years and older, who carried the diagnosis of fibromyalgia but who had no previously recognized neurological disease underwent detailed clinical neurological and neuroradiological evaluation for the prevalence of objective evidence of cervical myelopathy and radiological evidence of cerebellar tonsillar herniation (Chiari 1 malformation) or cervical spinal canal stenosis.

Results

Patients were primarily women (87%), of mean age 44 years, who had been symptomatic for 8 years (standard deviation, 6.3 years). The predominant complaints were neck/back pain (95%), fatigue (95%), exertional fatigue (96%), cognitive impairment (92%), instability of gait (85%), grip weakness (83%), paresthesiae (80%), dizziness (71%) and numbness (69%). Eighty-eight percent of patients reported worsening symptoms with neck extension. The neurological examination was consistent with cervical myelopathy: upper thoracic spinothalamic sensory level (83%), hyperreflexia (64%), inversion of the radial periosteal reflex (57%), positive Romberg sign (28%), ankle clonus (25%), positive Hoffman sign (26%), impaired tandem walk (23%), dysmetria (15%) and dysdiadochokinesia (13%). MRI and contrast-enhanced CT imaging of the cervical spine revealed stenosis. The mean antero-posterior (AP) spinal canal diameter at C2/3, C3/4, C4/5, C5/6, C6/7 and C7/T1 was 13.5 mm, 11.8 mm, 11.5 mm, 10.4 mm, 11.3 mm and 14.5 mm respectively, (CT images). In 46% of patients, the AP spinal diameter at C5/6 measured 10 mm, or less, with the neck positioned in mild extension, i.e., clinically significant spinal canal stenosis. MRI of the brain revealed tonsillar ectopia >5 mm in 20% of patients (mean=7.1±1.8 mm), i.e., Chiari 1 malformation.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that some patients who carry the diagnosis of fibromyalgia have both signs and symptoms consistent with cervical myelopathy, most likely resulting from spinal cord compression. We recommend detailed neurological evaluation of patients with fibromyalgia in order to exclude cervical myelopathy, a potentially treatable condition.

Keywords

Fibromyalgia Cervical myelopathy Spinal stenosis Chiari 1 malformation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Supported in part by a grant from the National Fibromyalgia Research Association, which played no role in the design or execution of this work. We would like to thank Drs. Daniel Malone, Scott Kale, Robert Bennett, Peter Rowe and Norman Kohn for their extensive review and very constructive criticism of the manuscript and Dr. Michael Huckman for review of issues relating to radiological imaging. We would like to thank Dr. Kareem Foloshade and Ms. Melissa Martinez for meticulous data entry.

References

  1. 1.
    An HS (1998) Clinical presentation of discogenic neck pain, radiculopthy and myelopathy. In: The Cervical Spine Research Society (editorial committee) The cervical spine, 3rd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 755–764Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arroyo JF, Cohen ML (1993) Abnormal response to electrocutaneous stimulation in fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 20:1925–1931PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barkovich AJ, Wippold FJ, Sherman JL et al (1986) Significance of cerebellar tonsillar position on MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 7:795–799PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barnes MP, Saunders M (1984) The effect of cervical mobility on the natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 47:17–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barsky AJ, Borus JF (1999) Functional somatic syndromes. Ann Intern Med 130:910–921PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bendtsen L, Norregaard J, Jensen R et al (1997) Evidence of qualitatively altered nociception in patients with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 40:98–102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Benner BG (1998) Etiology and pathogenesis of discogenic neck pain. In: The Cervical Spine Research Society (editorial committee) The cervical spine, 3rd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 735–740Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bennett RM (1995) Fibromyalgia: the commonest cause of widespread pain. Compr Ther 21:269–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bennett RM (1999) Fibromyalgia. In: Wall PD, Melzack R (eds) Textbook of pain, 4th edn. Churchill Livingstone, London pp 579–599Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blumberg KD, Simeone FA (1992) Indications for surgery in cervical myelopathy: anterior versus posterior approach. In: Rothman RH, Simeone FA (eds) The spine, 3rd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 613–625Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bohlman HH, Emery SE (1988) The pathophysiology of cervical spondylosis and myelopathy. Spine 13:843–846PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brain RW, Northfield D, Wilkinson M (1952) The neurological manifestations of cervical spondylosis. Brain 75:187–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Buchwald D (1996) Fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome: similarities and differences. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 22:219–243Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buskila D, Neumann L, Vaisberg G et al (1997) Increased rates of fibromyalgia following cervical spine injury. A controlled study of 161 cases of traumatic injury. Arthritis Rheum 40:446–452PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clarke E, Robinson PK (1956) Cervical myelopathy: a complication of cervical spondylosis. Brain 79:483–510PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Crandall PH, Batzdorf U (1966) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg 25:57–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dejong RN (1979) The muscle stretch reflexes. In: Dejong RN, Magee KR (eds) The neurological examination. Harper and Row, Hagerstown, MD, pp 431–445Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dillin WH, Watkins RG (1992) Clinical syndromes of cervical myelopathy. In: Rothman RH, Simeone FA (eds) The Spine, 3rd edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 560–570Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dyste GN, Menezes AH, VanGilder JC (1989) Symptomatic Chiari malformations, an analysis of presentation, management and long-term outcome. J Neurosurg 71:159–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Edwards WC, LaRocca SH (1985) The developmental segmental sagittal diameter in combined cervical and lumbar stenosis. Spine 10:42–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Elster AD, Chen MYM (1992) Chiari 1 malformations: clinical and radiologic reappraisal. Radiology 183:347–353PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Forseth KO, Forre O, Gran JT (1999) A 5.5 year prospective study of self-reported musculoskeletal pain and of fibromyalgia in a female population: significance and natural history. Clin Rheumatol 18:114–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Giovengo SL, Russell IJ, Larson AA (1999) Increased concentrations of nerve growth factor in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 26:1564–1569PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goldenberg DL (1987) Fibromyalgia syndrome, an emerging but controversial condition. JAMA 257:2782–2787CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goldenberg DL (1996) What is the future of fibromyalgia? Rheum Dis Clin North Am 22:393–406PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Graham CB, Wippold FJ, Bae KT et al (2001) Comparison of CT myelography performed in the prone and supine positions in the detection of cervical spinal stenosis. Clin Radiol 56:35–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Heller JG, Pedlow FX (1998) Anatomy of the cervical spine. In: The Cervical Spine Research Society (editorial committee) The cervical spine, 3rd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 3–35Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Herzog RJ, Wiens JJ, Dillingham MF et al (1991) Normal cervical spine morphometry and cervical spinal stenosis in asymptomatic professional football players. Plain film radiography, multiplanar computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 16:S178–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jahnke RW, Hart BL (1991) Cervical stenosis, spondylosis and herniated disc disease. Radiol Clin North Am 29:777–791PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kaiser JA, Holland BA (1998) Imaging of the cervical spine. Spine 23:2701–2712CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kosek E, Ekholm J, Hansson P (1996) Sensory dysfunction in fibromyalgia patients with implications for pathogenic mechanisms. Pain 68:375–383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kwiatek R, Barnden L, Tedman R et al (2000) Regional cerebral blood flow in fibromyalgia: single photon-emission computed tomography evidence of reduction in the pontine tegmentum and thalami. Arthritis Rheum 43:2823–2833CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lautenbacher S, Rollman GB (1997) Possible deficiencies of pain modulation in fibromyalgia. Clin J Pain 13:189–196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lees F, Turner JWA (1963) Natural history and prognosis of cervical spondylosis. Br Med J 2:1607–1610Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Matsuura P, Waters RL, Adkins RH et al (1989) Comparison of computerized tomography parameters of the cervical spine in normal control subjects and spinal cord injured patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:183–188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Meadows J, Kraut M, Guarnieri M et al (2000) Asymptomatic Chiari type 1 malformation identified on magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 92:920–926PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mense S (2000) Neurobiological concepts of fibromyalgia—the possible role of descending spinal tracts. Scand J Rheumatol [Suppl] 113:24–29Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Milhorat TH, Chou MW, Trinidad EM et al (1999) Chiari 1 malformation redefined: clinical and radiological findings in 364 symptomatic patients. Neurosurgery 44:1005–1017PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mountz JM, Bradley LA, Modell JG et al (1995) Fibromyalgia in women. Abnormalities of regional cerebral blood flow in the thalamus and caudate nucleus are associated with low pain threshold levels. Arthritis Rheum 38:926–938PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Muhle C, Wiskirchen J, Weinert D et al (1998) Biomechanical aspects of the subarachnoid space and cervical cord in healthy individuals examined with kinematic magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 23:556–567CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Muhle C, Metzner J, Weinert D et al (1999) Kinematic MR imaging in surgical management of cervical disc disease, spondylosis and spondylotic myelopathy. Acta Radiol 40:146–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Parke WW (1988) Correlative anatomy of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 13:831–837PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Reul J, Gievers B, Weis J et al (1995) Assessment of the narrow cervical spinal canal: a prospective comparison of MRI, myelography and CT-myelography. Neuroradiology 37:187–191PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Russel EJ (1995) Computed tomography and myelography in the evaluation of cervical degenerative disease. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 5:329–348PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Russell IJ, Orr MD, Littman B et al (1994) Elevated cerebrospinal fluid levels of substance P in patients with the fibromyalgia syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 37:1593–1601PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sampath P, Bendebba M, Davis JD et al (2000) Outcome of patients treated for cervical myelopathy. Spine 25:670–676CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Simmons Z, Biller J, Beck DW et al (1986) Painless compressive cervical myelopathy and false localizing sensory findings. Spine 11:869–872PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Stanley JH, Schabel SI, Frey GD et al (1986) Quantitative analysis of the cervical spinal canal by computed tomography. Neuroradiology 28:139–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Thimineur M, Kitaj M, Kravitz E et al (2002) Functional abnormalities of the cervical cord and lower medulla and their effect on pain: observations in chronic pain patients with incidental mild Chiari 1 malformation and moderate to severe cervical cord compression. Clin J Pain 18:171–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Torg JS, Pavlov H, Genuario SE et al (1986) Neurapraxia of the spinal cord with transient quadriplegia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68(9):1354–1370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ulrich CG (1998) Computed tomography and myelography of the cervical spine. In: The Cervical Spine Research Society (editorial committee) The cervical spine, 3rd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 253–270Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Vaeroy H, Helle R, Forre O et al (1988) Elevated CSF levels of substance P and high incidence of Raynaud phenomenon in patients with fibromyalgia: new features for diagnosis. Pain 32:21–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wallace DJ (1997) The fibromyalgia syndrome. Ann Med 29:9–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wolfe F (1986) The clinical syndrome of fibrositis. Am J Med [Suppl 3A] 81:7–14Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB et al (1990) The American College of Rheumatology, 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia: report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 33:160–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wolfe F, Ross K, Anderson J (1995) The prevalence and characteristics of fibromyalgia in the general population. Arthritis Rheum 38:19–28PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan S. Heffez
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ruth E. Ross
    • 2
  • Yvonne Shade-Zeldow
    • 2
  • Konstantinos Kostas
    • 2
  • Sagar Shah
    • 2
  • Robert Gottschalk
    • 2
  • Dean A. Elias
    • 3
  • Alan Shepard
    • 2
  • Sue E. Leurgans
    • 3
  • Charity G. Moore
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Heffez Neurosurgical Associates SCChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Chicago Institute of Neurosurgery and NeuroresearchChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Rush Presbyterian St. Luke’s Medical CenterChicagoUSA
  4. 4.The University of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations