Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 449–456 | Cite as

Gait analysis in patients with idiopathic scoliosis

  • Inès A. Kramers-de Quervain
  • Roland Müller
  • A. Stacoff
  • Dieter Grob
  • Edgar Stüssi
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

The goal of this study was to observe scoliotic subjects during level walking to identify asymmetries—which may be related to a neurological dysfunction or the spinal deformity itself—and to correlate these to the severity of the scoliotic curve.

Methods

We assessed the gait pattern of ten females (median age 14.4) with idiopathic scoliosis characterised by a left-lumbar and a right-thoracic curve component. Gait analysis consisted of 3D kinematic (VICON) and kinetic (Kistler force plates) measurements. The 3D-segment positions of the head, trunk and pelvis, as well as the individual joint angles of the upper and lower extremities, were computed during walking and static standing. Calculation of pertinent kinetic and kinematic parameters allowed statistical comparison.

Results

All subjects walked at a normal velocity (median: 1.22 m/s; range:1.08–1.30 m/s; height-adjusted velocity: 0.75 m/s; range: 0.62–0.88 m/s). The timing of the individual gait phases was normal and symmetrical for the whole group. Sagittal plane hip, knee and ankle motion followed a physiological pattern. Significant asymmetry was observed in the trunk’s rotational behaviour in the transverse plane. During gait, the pelvis and the head rotated symmetrically to the line of progression, whereas trunk rotation was asymmetric, with increased relative forward rotation of the right upper body in relation to the pelvis. This produced a torsional offset to the line of progression. Minimal torsion (at right heel strike) measured: median 1.0° (range: 5.1°–8.3°), and maximal torsion (at left heel strike) measured 11.4° (range 6.9°–17.9°). The magnitude of the torsional offset during gait correlated to the severity of the thoracic deformity and to the standing posture, whereas the range of the rotational movement was not affected by the severity of the deformity. The ground reaction forces revealed a significant asymmetry of [Msz], the free rotational moment around the vertical axis going through the point of equivalent force application. On the right side, the initial endo-rotational moment was lower, followed by a higher exo-rotational moment than on the left. All the other force parameters (vertical, medio–lateral, anterior–posterior), did not show a significant side difference for the whole group. The use of a brace stiffened torsional motion. However the torsional offset and the asymmetry of the free rotational moment remained unchanged.

Conclusion

The most significant and marked asymmetry was seen in the transverse plane, denoted as a torsional offset of the upper trunk in relation to the symmetrically rotating pelvis. This motion pattern was reflected by a ground-reaction-force asymmetry of the free rotational moment. Further studies are needed to investigate whether this behaviour is solely an expression of the structural deformity or whether it could enhance the progression of the torsional deformity.

Keywords

Idiopathic scoliosis Gait analysis Biomechanics Asymmetry 

References

  1. 1.
    Burwell RG, Cole AA, Cook TA, Grivas TB, Kiel AW, Moulton A, Thirlwall AS, Upadhyay SS, Webb JK, Wemyss-Holden SA (1992) Pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. The Nottingham concept. Acta Orthop Belg [Suppl 1] 58:33–58Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen PQ, Wang JL, Tsuang YH, Liao TL, Huang PI, Hang YS (1998) The postural stability control and gait pattern of idiopathic scoliosis adolescents. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) [Suppl 1] 13:S52–58Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Engsberg JR, Bridwell KH, Reitenbach AK, Uhrich ML, Baldus C, Blanke K, Lenke LG (2001) Preoperative gait comparisons between adults undergoing long spinal deformity fusion surgery (thoracic to L4, L5, or sacrum) and controls. Spine 26(18):2020–2028CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Giakas G, Baltzopoulos V, Dangerfield PH, Dorgan JC, Dalmira S (1996) Comparison of gait patterns between healthy and scoliotic patients using time and frequency domain analysis of ground reaction forces. Spine 21(19):2235–2242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldberg CJ, Dowling FE, Fogarty EE, Moore DP (1995) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and cerebral asymmetry. An examination of a nonspinal perceptual system. Spine 20(15):1685–1691PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Herzog W, Nigg BM, Read LJ, Olsson E (1989) Asymmetries in ground reaction force patterns in normal human gait. Med Sci Sports Exerc 21(5):625–626PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lenke LG, Engsberg JR, Ross SA, Reitenbach A, Blanke K, Bridwell KH (2001) Prospective dynamic functional evaluation of gait and spinal balance following spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 26(14):E330–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meglan DA (1991) Enhanced analysis of human locomotion. Dissertation, Ohio State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Perry J (1992) Gait Analysis, Normal and Pathological function. Slack, Monterey, CAGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schizas CG, Kramers-de Quervain IA, Stussi E, Grob D (1998) Gait asymmetries in patients with idiopathic scoliosis using vertical forces measurement only. Eur Spine J 7(2):95–98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seichert N (1994) Die klinische Bedeutung des transversalen Drehmomentes bei der Ganganalyse mit Kraftmessplatten. SUVA Rehabilitationsklinik Bellikon. Rehabilitation 2350(7):45–59Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stüssi E; Debrunner HU (1980) Parameteranalyse des menschlichen Ganges. Biomed Tech 25:222–224Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sutherland DH, Olshen RA, Biden EN, Wyatt MP (1988) The Development of Mature Walking. Mac Keith Press, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inès A. Kramers-de Quervain
    • 1
    • 2
  • Roland Müller
    • 1
  • A. Stacoff
    • 1
  • Dieter Grob
    • 2
  • Edgar Stüssi
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for BiomechanicsETH ZürichSchlierenSwitzerland
  2. 2.Schulthess ClinicZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations