European Spine Journal

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 22–31 | Cite as

A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results

  • J. F. Zucherman
  • K. Y. Hsu
  • C. A. Hartjen
  • T. F. Mehalic
  • D. A. Implicito
  • M. J. Martin
  • D. R. JohnsonII
  • G. A. Skidmore
  • P. P. Vessa
  • J. W. Dwyer
  • S. Puccio
  • J. C. Cauthen
  • R. M. Ozuna
Original Article

Abstract

Patients suffering from neurogenic intermittent claudication secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis have historically been limited to a choice between a decompressive laminectomy with or without fusion or a regimen of non-operative therapies. The X STOP Interspinous Process Distraction System (St. Francis Medical Technologies, Concord, Calif.), a new interspinous implant for patients whose symptoms are exacerbated in extension and relieved in flexion, has been available in Europe since June 2002. This study reports the results from a prospective, randomized trial of the X STOP conducted at nine centers in the U.S. Two hundred patients were enrolled in the study and 191 were treated; 100 received the X STOP and 91 received non-operative therapy (NON OP) as a control. The Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) was the primary outcomes measurement. Validated for lumbar spinal stenosis patients, the ZCQ measures physical function, symptom severity, and patient satisfaction. Patients completed the ZCQ upon enrollment and at follow-up periods of 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. Using the ZCQ criteria, at 6 weeks the success rate was 52% for X STOP patients and 10% for NON OP patients. At 6 months, the success rates were 52 and 9%, respectively, and at 1 year, 59 and 12%. The results of this prospective study indicate that the X STOP offers a significant improvement over non-operative therapies at 1 year with a success rate comparable to published reports for decompressive laminectomy, but with considerably lower morbidity.

Keywords

Lumbar spinal stenosis Surgical treatment Conservative treatment Randomized study Prospective study 

References

  1. 1.
    Amundsen TH, Weber F (1995) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiologic features. Spine 20:1178–1186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amundsen TH, Weber HJ et al. (2000) Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine 25:1424–1436PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arbit E, Pannullo S (2001) Lumbar stenosis: a clinical review. Clin Orthop 384:137–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benz RJ, Ibrahim ZG, Afshar P et al. (2001) Predicting complications in elderly patients undergoing lumbar decompression. Clin Orthop 384:116–121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blau JN, Logue V (1978) The natural history of intermittent claudication of the cauda equina. A long term follow-up study. Brain 101:211–222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caserta S, La Maida GA, Misaggi B et al. (2002) Elastic stabilization alone or combined with rigid fusion in spinal surgery: a biomechanical study and clinical experience based on 82 cases. Eur Spine J 11 (Suppl 2):S192–S197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chung SS, Lee CS, Kim SH et al. (2000) Effect of low back posture on the morphology of the spinal canal. Skeletal Radiol 29:217–223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ciric I, Mikhael MA, Tarkington JA et al. (1980) The lateral recess syndrome. A variant of spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg 53:433–443PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deo S, Wanders L, Makan P et al. (1998) Outcome measures for neurogenic claudication. North American Spine Society, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dong G, Porter RW (1989) Walking and cycling tests in neurogenic and intermittent claudication. Spine 14:965–969PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dyck P (1979) The stoop-test in lumbar entrapment radiculopathy. Spine 4:89–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dyck P, Doyle JB Jr (1977) “Bicycle test” of van Gelderen in diagnosis of intermittent cauda equina compression syndrome. Case report. J Neurosurg 46:667–670PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fritz JM, Delitto A, Welch WC et al. (1998) Lumbar spinal stenosis: a review of current concepts in evaluation, management, and outcome measurements. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79:700–708PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fujiwara A, An HS, Lim TH et al. (2001) Morphologic changes in the lumbar intervertebral foramen due to flexion–extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation an in vitro anatomic and biomechanical study. Spine 26:876–882CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gunzburg R, Szpalski M (2000) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 414Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hansraj KK, Cammisa FP Jr, O’Leary PF et al. (2001) Decompressive surgery for typical lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop 384:10–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hasegawa T, An HS, Haughton VM et al. (1995) Lumbar foraminal stenosis: critical heights of the intervertebral discs and foramina. A cryomicrotome study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:32–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Herno A, Airaksinen O, Saari T et al. (1996) Lumbar spinal stenosis: a matched-pair study of operated and non-operated patients. Br J Neurosurg 10:461–465CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Albert TJ et al. (1997) Relationship of total hip arthroplasty outcomes to other orthopaedic procedures. Clin Orthop 344:88–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hu RW, Jaglal S, Axcell T et al. (1997) A population-based study of reoperations after back surgery. Spine 22:2265–2271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hurri H, Slatis P, Soini J et al. (1998) Lumbar spinal stenosis: assessment of long-term outcome 12 years after operative and conservative treatment. J Spinal Disord 11:110–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Iguchi T, Kurihara A, Nakayama J et al. (2000) Minimum 10-year outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 25:1754–1759CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Inufusa A, An HS, Lim TH et al. (1996) Anatomic changes of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen associated with flexion–extension movement. Spine 21:2412–2420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jenis LG, An HS (2000) Spine update. Lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine 25:389–394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Johnsson KE, Rosen I, Uden A (1992) The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop 279:82–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jonsson B, Annertz M, Sjoberg C et al. (1997) A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: Clinical features related to radiographic findings. Spine 22:2932–2937CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jonsson B, Annertz M, Sjoberg C et al. (1997) A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Five-year follow-up by an independent observer. Spine 22:2938–2944CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Larson MG et al. (1991) The outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:809–816PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Katz JN, Dalgas M, Stucki G et al. (1995) Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Diagnostic value of the history and physical examination. Arthritis Rheum 38:1236–1241PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Chang LC et al. (1996) Seven- to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 21:92–98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Katz JN, Stucki G, Lipson SJ et al. (1999) Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 24:2229–2233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Wedge JH, Yong-Hing K et al. (1978) Pathology and pathogenesis of lumbar spondylosis and stenosis. Spine:319–328Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lindsey DP, Swanson KE, Fuchs P et a. (2003) The effects of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine. Spine:2192–2197Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Magnaes B (1982) Clinical recording of pressure on the spinal cord and cauda equina. Part 2: Position changes in pressure on the cauda equina in central lumbar spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg 57:57–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mulholland RC, Sengupta DK (2002) Rationale, principles and experimental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilization. Eur Spine J 11 (Suppl 2):S198–S205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Onel D, Sari H, Donmez C (1993) Lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical/radiologic therapeutic evaluation in 145 patients. Conservative treatment or surgical intervention? Spine 18:291–298PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Penning L, Wilmink JT (1987) Posture-dependent bilateral compression of L4 or L5 nerve roots in facet hypertrophy. A dynamic CT-myelographic study. Spine 12:488–500PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Porter RW (1996) Spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication. Spine 21:2046–2052CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Postacchini F, Cinotti G, Perugia D et al. (1993) The surgical treatment of central lumbar stenosis. Multiple laminotomy compared with total laminectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:386–392PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pratt RK, Fairbank JC, Virr A (2002) The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 27:84–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Richards J, Majumdar S, Lindsey D et al. (2002) Quantitative changes in the lumbar spinal canal with an interspinous implant. Trans Int Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques, MontreuxGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Saifuddin A (2000) The imaging of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Radiol 55:581–594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schonstrom N, Lindahl S, Willen J et al. (1989) Dynamic changes in the dimensions of the lumbar spinal canal: an experimental study in vitro. J Orthop Res 7:115–121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Schonstrom N, Willen J (2001) Imaging lumbar spinal stenosis. Radiol Clin North Am 39:31–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Senegas J (1990) La ligametoplastie intervertebrale, alternative a l’arthrodese dans le traitment des instabilities degeneratives. In: Simon L et al. (eds) La hernie discale lombaire. Masson, Paris, pp 308–315Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Senegas J (1991) Surgery of the intervertebral ligaments, alternative to arthrodesis in the treatment of degenerative instabilities. Acta Orthop Belg 57 (Suppl 1):221–226 [in French]PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Senegas J (2002) Mechanical supplementation by non-rigid fixation in degenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: the Wallis system. Eur Spine J 11 (Suppl 2):S164–S169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Simotas AC (2001) Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop 384:153–161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Simotas AC, Dorey FJ, Hansraj KK et al. (2000) Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and outcome results and a 3-year survivorship analysis. Spine 25:197–204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sortland O, Magnaes B, Hauge T (1977) Functional myelography with metrizamide in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Radiol Suppl 355:42–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O (2002) The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine J 11 (Suppl 2):S170–S178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Strömqvist B, Jonsson B, Fritzell P et al. (2001) The Swedish National Register for lumbar spine surgery: Swedish Society for Spinal Surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 72:99–106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossel AH et al. (1995) Relative responsiveness of condition-specific and generic health status measures in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Clin Epidemiol 48:1369–1378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Stucki G, Daltroy L, Liang MH et al. (1996) Measurement properties of a self-administered outcome measure in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 21:796–803CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Swanson K, Lindsey D, Hsu K et al. (2002) The effect of an interspinous spacer on the intradiscal stress of the adjacent and treated levels. In: Trans Int Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques, MontreuxGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Swanson KE, Lindsey DP, Hsu KY et al. (2003) The effects of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures. Spine 28:26–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Takahashi K, Hirasawa K, Unayama K (1999) Effects of walking posture, velocity and stride on neurogenic claudication: analysis with epidural pressure. In: Int Soc for the Study of the Lumabr Spine, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L et al. (1992) Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine 17:1–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Verbiest H (1954) A radicular syndrome from developmental narrowing of the lumbae vertebral canal. J Bone Joint Surg 36B:230–237Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Verbiest H (1973) Neurogenic intermittent claudication in cases with absolute and relative stenosis of the lumbar vertebral canal (ASLC and RSLC), in cases with narrow lumbar intervertebral foramina, and in cases with both entities. Clin Neurosurg 20:204–214PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Verbiest H (1976) Fallacies of the present definition, nomenclature, and classification of the stenoses of the lumbar vertebral canal. Spine 1:217–225Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Willen J, Danielson B, Gaulitz A et al. (1997) Dynamic effects on the lumbar spinal canal: axially loaded CT-myelography and MRI in patients with sciatica and/or neurogenic claudication. Spine 22:2968–2976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Yerby S, Lindsey D, Swanson K et al. (2002) Influence of an interspinous spacer on the kinematics of the lumbar spine. In: Trans Eurospine. Nantes, FranceGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Yerby S, Lindsey D, Swanson K et al. (2002) Influence of an interspinous spacer on the kinematics of the lumbar spine. In Trans Int Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques, MontreuxGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Yoshida M, Shima K, Taniguchi Y et al. (1992) Hypertrophied ligamentum flavum in lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Pathogenesis and morphologic and immunohistochemical observation. Spine 17:1353–1360PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Zucherman J, Hsu K, Hartjen C et al. (2002) Multicenter randomized prospective trial for treatment of lumbar neurogenic claudication with an interspinous device: 1-year results. In: Trans Int Soc for the Study of the Lumbar Spine, Cleveland, OhioGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Zucherman J, Hsu K, Hartjen C et al. (2002) Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with an interspinous spacer. In: Trans Int Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques, MontreuxGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Zucherman J, Hsu K, Hartjen C et al. (2002) Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with an interspinous spacer. In: Trans North American Spine Society, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Zucherman J, Hsu K, Hartjen C et al. (2002) Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with an interspinous spacer. In: Trans Eurospine. Nantes, FranceGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. F. Zucherman
    • 1
  • K. Y. Hsu
    • 1
  • C. A. Hartjen
    • 2
  • T. F. Mehalic
    • 3
  • D. A. Implicito
    • 4
  • M. J. Martin
    • 5
  • D. R. JohnsonII
    • 6
  • G. A. Skidmore
    • 7
  • P. P. Vessa
    • 4
  • J. W. Dwyer
    • 4
  • S. Puccio
    • 8
  • J. C. Cauthen
    • 9
  • R. M. Ozuna
    • 8
  1. 1.St. Mary’s Spine CenterSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Greater Baltimore Medical CenterBaltimore
  3. 3.Maine Medical CenterPortland
  4. 4.Somerset Medical CenterSomerset
  5. 5.Tacoma General HospitalTacoma
  6. 6.East Cooper Medical CenterMount Pleasant
  7. 7.East Virginia Medical SchoolNorfolk
  8. 8.Brigham and Women’s HospitalBoston
  9. 9.North Florida Regional Medical CenterGainesville

Personalised recommendations