European Spine Journal

, Volume 12, Issue 5, pp 535–541 | Cite as

Spinal stenosis surgery in Sweden 1987–1999

  • K-Å. Jansson
  • P. Blomqvist
  • F. Granath
  • G. Németh
Original Article


Despite being recognised for many years as a clinical diagnosis, no exact definition of spinal stenosis has yet been agreed, leading to difficulties in interpreting and comparing studies of the incidence, prevalence and treatment. This study presents the first analysis of national data to be reported. It is a retrospective population-based national register study, aimed at analyzing surgical interventions in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, patient characteristics, subsequent development, and case fatality rate, based on Swedish national data for 1987–1999. Complete follow-up data were obtained of incidence and type of spinal stenosis surgery, rate of multiple operations, mortality, underlying causes of death, length of hospital stay, and case fatality rate by linkage of the National Inpatient Register and Swedish Death Register. The study cohort consisted of 10,494 patients. Laminectomy was performed in 89%, and additional fusion in 11%. The mean annual rate of operations was 9.7 per 100,000 inhabitants, the annual number of operations performed increased from 4.7 to 13.2 per 100,000 inhabitants per year. The case fatality rate within 30 days after surgery was 3.5 per 1000 operations. Cardiovascular disease was the most common cause of death (46%). Relative risk of dying within 30 days of admission was doubled in men, and for fusion surgery, and increased four fold in patients older than 80 years. The relative risk of dying decreased during the study period. The results show that spinal stenosis surgery in Sweden has increased, and is associated with a low risk. Within an ageing group of patients, mortality has declined.


Spinal stenosis Population based Epidemiology Mortality 



We thank Anders Ekbom for inspiring discussions on the study design.


  1. 1.
    Amundsen T, Weber H, Lilleas F (1995) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiologic features. Spine 20:1178–1186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amundsen T, Weber H, Lilleas F, et al (2000) Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine 25:1424–1435PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atlas S, Deyo R, Keller R, et al (1996) The Maine Lumbar Spine Study. III. One-year outcomes of surgical and non-surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 21:1787–1794CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berney J (1994) Epidemiology of narrow spinal canal. Neurochirurgie 40:174–178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boden S (1996) The use of radiographic imaging studies in the evaluation of patients who have degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:114–124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bolender N, Schönström N, Spengler D (1985) Role of computed tomography and myelography in the diagnosis of central spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:240–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ciol M, Deyo R, Howell E, Kreif S (1996) An assesment of surgery for spinal stenosis: time trends, geographic variations, complications, and reoperations. J Am Geriatr Soc 44:285–290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deyo R, Cherkin D, Loeser J, Bigos S, Ciol M (1992) Morbidity and mortality in association with operations on the lumbar spine. The influence of age, diagnosis, and procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:536–543PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Herno A, Airaksinen O, Saari T (1993) Long-term results of surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 18:1471–1474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hopp E, Tsou P (1983) Postdecompression lumbar instability. Clin Orthop 179:86–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnsson K (1995) Lumbar spinal stenosis. A retrospective study of 163 cases in southern Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 66:403–405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnsson K, Uden A, Rosen I (1991) The effect of decompression on the natural course of spinal stenosis. A comparison of surgically treated and untreated patients. Spine 16:615–619PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Katz J, Lipson S, Larson M, McInnes J, Fossel A, Liang M (1991) The outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:809–816PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kent D, Haynor D, Larson E, et al (1992) Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis in adults. A meta analysis of the accuracy of CT, MR and myelography. Am J Roentgenol 158:1135–1144Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martinelli T, Wiesel S (1992) Epidemiology of spinal stenosis. Instr Course Lect 179–181Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nilasena D, Vaughn R, Mori M, Lyon J (1995) Surgical trends in the treatment of diseases of the lumbar spine in Utah's Medicare population, 1984 to 1990. Med Care 33:585–597PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oldridge N, Yuan Z, Stoll J, Rimm A (1994) Lumbar spine surgery and mortality among Medicare beneficiaries, 1986. Am J Public Health 84:1292–1298PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parvizi J, Johnson B, Rowland C, Ereth M, Lewallen D (2001) Thirty-day mortality after elective total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1524–1528Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rothman K (1998) Introduction to categorical statistics. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S (eds) Modern epidemiology, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    SAS Institute (1997) SAS/STAT (R) software: changes and enhancements through release 6.12. SAS Institute, Cary, pp 247–348Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schönström NS, Bolender NF, Spengler DM (1985) The pathomorphology of spinal stenosis as seen on CT scans of the lumbar spine. Spine 10:806–811PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Simotas A, Dorey F, Hansraj K, Cammisa Jr F, Katz J (2000) Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and outcome results and a 3-year survivorship analysis. Spine 25:197–203; - R29-10401Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Statistics (1998) Health, diseases, causes of death 1996. The National Board of Health and Welfare, Centre for Epidemiology, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Statistics Sweden (1997) Statistical yearbook of Sweden 1997. Statistics Sweden, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Statistics Sweden (2000) Statistical yearbook of Sweden 2000. Statistics Sweden, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Strömqvist B, Jönsson B, Fritzell P, Hägg O, Larsson B, Lind B (2001) The Swedish National Register for Lumbar Spine Surgery, Swedish Society for Spinal Surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 72:99–106PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • K-Å. Jansson
    • 1
  • P. Blomqvist
    • 2
  • F. Granath
    • 2
  • G. Németh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OrthopedicsKarolinska HospitalStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine at Karolinska HospitalKarolinska InstituteStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations