Load shift of the intervertebral disc after a vertebroplasty: a finite-element study
- 839 Downloads
Infiltrating osteoporotic cancellous bone with bone cement (vertebroplasty) is a novel surgical procedure to stabilize and prevent osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Short-term clinical and biomechanical results are encouraging; however, so far no reports on long-term results have been published. Our clinical observations suggest that vertebroplasty may induce subsequent fractures in the vertebrae adjacent to the ones augmented. At this point, there is only a limited understanding of what causes these fractures. We have previously hypothesized that adjacent fractures may result from a shift in stiffness and load following rigid augmentation. The purpose of this study is to determine the load shift in a lumbar motion segment following vertebroplasty. A finite-element (FE) model of a lumbar motion segment (L4-L5) was used to quantify and compare the pre- and post-augmentation stiffness and loading (load shift) of the intervertebral (IV) disc adjacent to the augmented vertebra in response to quasi-static compression. The results showed that the rigid cement augmentation underneath the endplates acted as an upright pillar that severely reduced the inward bulge of the endplates of the augmented vertebra. The bulge of the augmented endplate was reduced to 7% of its value before the augmentation, resulting in a stiffening of the IV joint by approximately 17%, and of the whole motion segment by approximately 11%. The IV pressure accordingly increased by approximately 19%, and the inward bulge of the endplate adjacent to the one augmented (L4 inferior) increased considerably, by approximately 17%. This increase of up to 17% in the inward bulge of the endplate adjacent to the one augmented may be the cause of the adjacent fractures.
KeywordsCement augmentation Vertebroplasty Complications Adjacent fractures Load shift Finite-element modeling
This work was supported by the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) grant no. MOP 57835.
- 2.Baroud G, Willmann G, Kreissig R (1997) The effect of the stem coating of the postoperative stress state of the femur. Biomed Tech 43:25–28Google Scholar
- 3.Baroud G, Görke U, Beckman L, Steffen T (2001) Physical changes of the vertebral tissue treated with vertebroplasty. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics (ISB), p. 728, 8–13 July, ZürichGoogle Scholar
- 4.Baroud G, Nemes J, Ferguson SJ, Steffen T (2003) Material changes in osteoporotic human cancellous bone following infiltration with acrylic bone cement for a vertebral cement augmentation. Comp Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 6:133-139Google Scholar
- 9.Eberlein R, Holzapfel GA, Suhulze-Bauer CAJ (1998) An anisotropic constitutive model for the annulus tissue and enhanced finite element analysis of intact lumbar disc bodies. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 4:209–230Google Scholar
- 10.Ferguson S, Berlemann U, Heini PF, Nolte LP (2001) Evaluation of adjacent segment failure following vertebroplasty. Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting, of the Orthopaedic Research Society (ORS), p. 280, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- 14.Jensen ME, Evans AJ, Mathis JM, et al (1997) Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects. AJNR 18:1897–1904Google Scholar
- 15.Nachemson AL (1963) The influence of spinal movement on the lumbar intradiscal pressure and on tensile stresses in annulus fibrosus. Acta Orthop Scand 33:183–207Google Scholar
- 16.Riggs BL, Melton LJ (1995) The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone 17[5 Suppl]: 505–511Google Scholar